A Terroristic Divorce

“It has become appallingly clear that our technology has surpassed our humanity.” – Albert Einstein

I might expand on this thought…. Society is sacrificing its humanity for technology.

When judges abandon and ignore the law to protect the technology, and conceal the misuse of technology, and conspire knowing the terror and harassment enabled by the technology, and are blackmailed to reward the criminals for misusing the technology and misusing the system… the technology has defeated humanity.

Is it the rise of the machines? When was judgement day? Hollywood would have had a hard time presenting programs which would destroy humanity so they represented the technology as an unstoppable “Terminator”.

“Listen, and understand. That terminator is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.”

Take “THE WAR OF THE ROSES”. Add “THE MATRIX”. As written by TOM CLANCY, STEPHEN KING and DAN BROWN.

Liberty Mutual usually contacts someone regarding a claim within 2 days. That did not happen.

Golden Eagle Corp was raised when an email was cc:d to a man named Mark. Initially the email was sent to a man by the same name at LibertyMutual.com.

It became more suspicious when his email on a cc: follow up was sent to him at GoldenEagleCorp.com.

I could find no domain for GoldenEagleCorp.com

I could not ping the domain.

I could find no one at Liberty Mutual who knew anything about a division or agency or market referred to as Golden Eagle.

I still have not heard from the fraud investigator since I asked him about Golden Eagle the other day.

Today, I find that some info is now available on GoldenEagleCorp.com

It is registered by a domain called MarkMonitor.com

That domain lists contacts at Liberty Mutual in Boston and Portsmouth, NH

It is easy to speculate about what MarkMonitor cvould be related to – espceially in light of the surveillance documented on this web site.

MarkMonitor handles brand protection. So if perhaps Liberty Mutual has become involved in something which it prefers not publicized with access and searches, a brand protection company might be able to provide those types of resources. So why would Liberty Mutual want that type of protection in my case?

It is long past time for people to stop the fraud, and the cover up , and the conspiracy, and the harassment and behave responsibly.

And if Liberty Mutual is not permitted to discuss claims or policies across state lines, then why doe sit seem the claims which were fraudulently submitted in my name over the summer were all handled through a company in Vermont?

The chaos never ends.

Would anyone care to explain what is going on here?
I’m not paranoid, I’m suspicious … and with reason.

Things to be thankful for…
After surviving 5 years of constant terror, harassment and litigation, the arrival of in your face corruption and fraud.

– dealing with the fraudulent conveyance of the deed to my house, the judge making certain I never see a penny from their secret sale, and the heartbreak of knowing they threw out my personal possessions while preventing me from ever retrieving anything,
– three fraudulent insurance claims made in my name,
– one insurance claim for all of my property which was thrown out,
– another claim regarding the loss of the use of the home,
– DOJ issues regarding illegal disclosure of surveillance product,
– FBI accusations that I was tapping their calls when THEY noticed I was being tapped,
– a newly elected sheriff who can’t explain her deputies actions at my home (or former home),
– a re-elected District Attorney who still refuses to investigate anything (perhaps because she is causing it),
– the corrupt judge preventing resolution of any matter by not permitting thew appeal to move forward.
– the same corrupt judge issuing opinions published only to herself (??) which are indicative of the extrinsic fraud which she has committed, and reaffirming the reason for the appeal,
– the liability of the actuality that their intentional fraudulent deed transfer results in my liability for the property,
– the necessity of filing a writ of mandamus with the Supreme Court of PA which will only serve to order the court to hold the hearings which they have intentionally failed to hold – WITH THE RIDICULOUS EXPECTATION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND JUSTICE TO FINALLY BE SERVED IN A COURTROOM,
– persevering and expecting justice when their intent and their necessity of denying any hearing so as to prevent the public testimony and evidence of the extreme volume of ex parte contact between EVERYONE EXCEPT ME and the judiciary in this matter,
– the inability to prevent the crimes and fraud from contining and being forced to suffer through further actions… just because they haven’t killed me – while I fear they will murder me.

In their course of the constant crime spree since 2007, it is just another crime for the district attorney to ignore.

No friends left.
Family unable to handle any more stress.
Isolation.
The holidays.
Homeless, unemployed and unable to eat many days because of the tooth pain.

Other than that, there’s so much to be thankful for… imagine the people who have nothing going on in their lives.

My prayer is for strength to endure. I persevere and hope for an end to this terroristic divorce.

If only they would prosecute the people responsible instead of enabling and encouraging their continued crimes against me.

I can’t stop them. I can’t make them obey the law.
I can only persevere and hope.
Happy Thanksgiving to All.

While I understand that this section of my Homeowners Insurance policy is intended for a fire or flood damaged home which becomes unliveable…

I have lost the use of my residence premises… because of the fraud committed by those acting to transfer the deed of my home, without my knowledge, without my permission, using a defective court order, which though procedurally defective and void clearly indicated that I was to be involved in any transfer of property.

The judge continues to delay any resolution on her defective order, and actively commits extrinsic fraud in attempts to deny my rights, and that can go another 4.5 years until the statute of limitations expires. This action and several other of the judge’s actions indicate her direct involvement in the commission of the fraud, and the intentional commission of the fraud, in violation of her own written orders.

The lawyer filed a document indicating that I was not to be told of the transfer of the deed, admitting to the intentional failure to follow the courts order, she was immediately rewarded with an extra $10,000 by the judge for doing so, and then withdrew the petition the following workday.

The fraud, and the intent to commit fraud is clear. I have lost the use of the residence premises. So I will file with Liberty Mutual once I get a clarification of what is, and is not, covered by this section of the policy.

Additionally, since the fraudulent conveyance of the deed is an act of fraud and ‘fraud voids’ is the de facto rule when it comes to fraud, I still require insurance for my property in case of injury or damage. Liberty Mutual is researching this instance.

Yea, the situation is crazy, and there is no resolution to any matter, I’ve been dealing with 5 years of these situations. They just don’t stop committing frauds and crimes, and the judges actively participate in the cover-up.

Follow up to my note earlier, if you were the person having trouble in February with a password reset, then you would be wise to secure the computer you are using as evidence in your case.

I assure you, they did not just target one computer in your home.

Hopefully, you have permission to continue our dialog. I have much more information to share.

I filed a claim with Liberty Mutual for the property loss.

I additionally suggested they investigate the fraudulent claims entered under my name throughout the last summer.

I asked for copies of those claims. When I received the copies, there were more questions.

In an email exchange I provided information in regard to the indications of fraud. In the replies I noticed an additioanl party had been included. And that persons email address changed from @LibertyMutual to @GoldenEagle.

Since I replied with the question regarding WHO IS GOLDEN EAGLE? I have heard nothing back. No one at Liberty Mutual seems to know of Golden Eagle Corp? I wonder if Golden Eagle is from St. Paul? or is a part of another insurance company? or organization?

The claims submitted under my name are false, the pictures are real, but do not represent damage at the house… unless it was caused after I left?

The damage locations are also key locations in the house where, upon hearing of insurance claims, I had expected the damage would occur in attempts to remove devices which had been placed in the house.

Sheriff Behr has REFUSED to respond to a request for why her deputies were dispatched to my home on June 9, 2011. Instead of sending the reports, she sent me an ethics complaint form and a letter indicating that was what I asked her for. Um. NO. I asked for the deputies reports and an investigation into the extreme corruption in the court. I even reminded you of it being your responsibility as chief law enforcement in the county.

Sheriff Behr also blocked me on Facebook. Odd, since it was my post there during her reelection campaign which suggested or prompted her to reply to my phone calls – albeit 3 weeks late. Why eliminate an effective means of communication, unless it involves you in a coverup. Then by all means, block me, but don’t block my mother, because then she/I can see how you only blocked me and deleted my posts from your wall.

In court, Sonya Healy testified that she did not request the deputies, and that her attorney had not requested the deputies, and Judge Carluccio denied a petition requesting the information regarding the deputies appearance at the house. Judge Carluccio also lied about holding a hearing on that matter, there was no hearing on that matter before Judge Carluccio again dismissed that petition and others.

The fraud grows.

My property loss claim is valid, because there is no proof that Sonya Healy was responsible fopr the entire loss, though she clearly enabled the loss, and police and Judge Carluccio encouraged the loss. The loss is real property. The fraudulent circumstances and malice and cruelty involved do not negate the loss. And the property which was lost was NOT shared property, as EVEN the defective divorce decree required MY PROPERTY to be given to me.

My insurance liability continues as they have fraudulently conveyed the deed to the house and that leaves liability with the prior owner. ME. Once again they commit fraud and leave me liable for the damage caused by their crime. The deed was not transferred. There was no power of attorney which permitted the deed to be transferred without my signature. The Order which they refer to as providing power of attorney expressly indicates the contrary. It orders me to sign the sale documents. BUT, since they kept the sale a secret, and have admitted that in the court documents, submitted and then withdrawn, they have acknowledged their intent to commit fraud.

The fraudulent conveyance of the deed is just another angle.

When everything they do is fraudulent or criminal, it forces everyone else to do all the clean up work… while they continue to defraud and harass and terrorize.

So who is Golden Eagle Corp? Do they do the clean up insurance work for out of control deceptions gone wrong?

Stop the fraud.

I again state that I have had no prior knowledge of the fraudulent insurance claims filed under my name by Sonya Healy, which resulted in checks being issued that I was forced to endorse under extreme duress and against my wishes by a corrupt judge in court on July 18, 2011 and September 23, 2011.

I am not a party to any of the fraudulent insurance claims of Sonya Healy, and any claims I make to the insurance company is with the full disclosure of what knowledge I have of her active participation in criminal acts, in violation of PA Law and direct court orders.

– Terance Healy

If anyone out there can contact Gabrielle Drexler or her attorney and put them in touch with me and my story, I think it will expose the extreme level of action that the District Attorney and her Drug Task Force will take to discredit a person.

http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news%2Fcrime&id=8437357&status=ok&status=ok

QUESTIONS?
WHY WOULD THIS GIRL GO TO ALL OF THIS TROUBLE?
WHY DOES IT SEEM THAT ALL OF THE EVIDENCE RELATING TO HER LACK OF CREDIBILITY IS DETERMINED BY COMPUTERS?
DID ANYONE TELL THE GRAND JURY OF THE CAPABILITIES OF THE COUNTY IN COMPUTER SURVEILLANCE AND EVIDENCE?

I did some looking around and noticed the officer in question was part of the K9 unit. Does the K9 unit handle drug investigations?

The charges that the girl is accused of all seem to be things which can be arranged through the use of this remote control / surveillance software.

She can’t have perjured herself if she believed it to be true.

If the evidence was tampered with who is to say she is the one who did it.

This girl is being harrased in an attempt to conceal the charge against the officers.

This is the same county who advised Lower Merion School District to spy on children using surveillance technology. They know how to use the software…

Did the Grand Jury discuss the use of the software to tamper with evidence, before they took her laptop? That would explain the duplicate sets of documents, and her not knowing where the items magically appeared from.

Advice to Garbielle’s lawyers, read up on Awareness Technologies and WebWatcher. And ask why Risa Ferman has not prosecuted or investigated a confirmed case of these programs being installed on my computers in 2007.

And it is worth keeping in mind, that the officer’s knowledge of these types of programs existing and their use (or misuse) by the drug task force would enable him to negotiate the County into discrediting the woman who stood up before Lower Merion and called him out, and then went further and filed a Federal suit on the matter, and then participated with a Grand Jury investigation.

I think a woman scorned would have stopped after the public announcement which alerted the officer’s wife and family. The truth would have gotten her the $100,000 she was after… I wonder what she will seek after being further victimized and villified.

The Brief from the DA’s office is as follows:
Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Vetri Ferman announces the arrest of Gabrielle Drexler of Lower Merion Township on charges of Perjury, Tampering with Evidence, False Reports to Law Enforcement Authorities and related offenses, which were committed during an inquiry conducted by the Montgomery County Investigating Grand Jury.

The Grand Jury investigation was launched shortly after Ms. Drexler appeared at a public meeting of the Lower Merion Township Commissioners on May 18, 2011, and accused officers of the Lower Merion Township Police Department of criminal wrongdoing. At that meeting, Ms. Drexler accused one officer of stalking and indecent assault and a second officer of illegal detention.

The Grand Jury carefully investigated these serious allegations. During the nearly six month investigation, the Grand Jury heard testimony from nine witnesses including Ms. Drexler. Grand Jurors reviewed hundreds of pages of documents including but not limited to police reports, witness statements and email communications.

The Grand Jury found that on May 20, 2011 members of the Montgomery County Detective Bureau contacted Ms. Drexler at her residence. Ms. Drexler claimed to the Detectives that she had proof of the officer’s guilt of stalking and indecent assault charges in the form of email communications that she received from the officer and retained. On that date she hand-delivered some of those printed emails to the Detectives. On May 23, 2011, Ms. Drexler forwarded additional emails to Detectives via her computer. The Detectives noticed that Ms. Drexler had provided them with a duplicate copy of an email that she had previously hand-delivered to them on May 20th captioned “you never reached 100 emails.”

A close inspection of the duplicative emails revealed that they were, in fact, different. The email Ms. Drexler sent to Detectives via her computer contained language that was not in the copy she hand-delivered to them. The additional language of the second copy of the email purportedly sent by the officer to Ms. Drexler contained information that, if believed, would have amounted to the officer’s confession to her accusations of indecent assault and stalking.

When Detectives asked Ms. Drexler if they could inspect her laptop computer, she refused to cooperate any further with the investigation. Consequently, Detectives obtained a search warrant and confiscated the laptop computer for a forensic investigation. Montgomery County Detectives subsequently conducted a forensic examination of Ms. Drexler’s laptop computer. The forensic examination revealed that the additional and incriminating language in the second email was put there by someone, who physically typed it on Ms. Drexler’s laptop keyboard. The examination revealed that the additional language could not have been made from any remote location. During the forensic examination of Ms. Drexler’s laptop, Detectives also found a second set of emails where additional and incriminating information was added, which if believed, would have incriminated the officer of a stalking charge.

During her testimony before the Grand Jury, Ms. Drexler authenticated the altered emails as being true copies of the emails sent her by the officer. She testified that her email account is password protected and that no one else has the password. She testified that no one else ever used her laptop except her. When questioned on the stand about the differences in the two sets of emails, Ms. Drexler stated the additional and incriminating language just “magically appeared”.

The Grand Jury also extensively investigated Ms. Drexler’s allegation of illegal detention against a second Lower Merion Township Police officer. On October 13, 2010, an officer on routine patrol observed a car pull behind a row of businesses on Lancaster Avenue at about 4 o’clock in the morning. About a minute later, the officer pulled behind the businesses and activated his overhead lights. This in turn activated an on-board video camera within the police car. The Grand Jury studied the video and heard from several witnesses concerning the October 13 stop. The entire incident lasted just over 8 minutes. The officer verified the identities of the occupants of the vehicle and then resumed his patrol. The Grand Jury found that the officer acted professionally and courteously and that no illegal detention had occurred.

The Grand Jury found no merit to any of Ms. Drexler’s criminal allegations and instead found that she was simply a woman scorned and sought retaliation against members of the police department. She did this by lying at a public meeting and then to a grand jury. The grand jury felt that this could not be tolerated and found probable cause that she had committed the crimes of perjury, false swearing, tampering with evidence and false reports.

The defendant was arraigned this morning by Magisterial District Judge Margaret Hunsicker. Bail was set at $50,000 unsecured.

The case will be prosecuted by the Captain of the Grand Jury and Public Corruption Unit, John Gradel.

Approved for release:

Risa Vetri Ferman

CRIMINAL CHARGES, AND ANY DISCUSSION THEREOF, ARE MERELY ALLEGATIONS AND ALL DEFENDANTS ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTIL AND UNLESS PROVEN GUILTY.

No one can obtain a fair trial in the court of Carolyn Carluccio.

In light of her actions and her clear intent to deny, prevent and obstruct any form of justice, Carolyn Carluccio has left herself open to further extortion by unscrupulous lawyers who know what she has done to me. Carolyn Carluccio is undeserving of the public trust.

I offer those persons similarly victimized in her courtroom the information necessary to attain her recusal by demonstrating her tactics. My permission is hereby granted to any party who has want to review the content of Docket #2007-12477 to review and copy and publish the content of the court docket.

Fraudulent manipulation of her schedule.

Intentionally issuing court orders which could not be followed.

Intentionally refusing to resolve issues in regard to her court orders.

Intentionally issuing defective court orders.

Intentionally acting to prevent escalation of legal matters to the Superior Court of PA.

Intentionally acting to aid in the commission of fraudulent conveyance of a title to property.

Intentionally acting to cause the destruction of property.

Intentionally acting to terrorize a party in response to extortion by an attorney.

Intentionally acting to conceal the corrupt, unethical and criminal actions of an attorney.

Intentionally acting to promote and encourage further acts of terror, violence and harassment against a party.

The list goes on and on… the evil she has promoted, concealed and conspired to encourage will hopefully be the actions which place her in a prison cell for at least as long as she has had me suffer. And if there is any justice in the world, everything she owns and loves should be removed from her while she watches alone and helplessly. For the injustice she has delivered upon her victims, she should be rewarded with justice and removed from the community which she has willfully and deliberately acted against.

I gladly provide the documentation necessary to any party who has need of escaping the evil which occurs in the corrupt courtroon of Carolyn Carluccio.

As I prepare the documents for the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, The Disciplinary Board, and the Judicial Conduct Board, I provide this service to the general public to avail themselves of the documents in the DOCKET section of this web site. Good Luck with your case.

I fear Carolyn Carluccio will use her resources, the county resources and anything available to her to cause my murder. I fear for my life, because she was unsuccessful in causing my suicide.

Carolyn Carluccio has no place on a bench in judgement of others.

Sonya Healy committed insurance fraud in filing claims with Liberty Mutual.

I have begun to review the documents she submitted and just from the pictures included with some of the claims, the fraud is evident.

Every action she has done in the last 5 years has been a fraud.

The actions of Judge Carluccio are indicative of her collaberation and active participation in the fraud.

The defective divorce decree is another fraud.

The actions of the judge to prevent any appeal is extrinsic fraud. Her actions further demonstrate her knowledge that an appeal would be granted. Otherwise why would she take such obvious actions to prevent the appeal. She is exposed. And as a result of Carolyn Carluccio’s exposure, the County is exposed. The judges, the detectives and the District Attorney. Their terroristic actions towards one man are clearly documented and exposed.

The actions of Valerie Angst , Sonya Healy and Carolyn Carluccio are fraudulent as they were intent on causing me harm, and causing damage to my property, and intent to cause fraudulent conveyance of my property. They have involved the resources of the County and those resources and personnel have participated by actively conspiring to conceal and cover up their crimes.

It is clear. They will not stop their fraud, their terror, their harassment.

It has gone on for 5 years, and no one will stop them. I fear they will kill me.

I have filed a claim for personal property loss with Liberty Mutual Insurance.

The following pictures document the dissipation and disposal of the assets by Sonya Healy and do not respresent the full extent of the property loss.

These pictures are from September 4, 2011:

These pictures are from August 28, 2011:

A Letter to Liberty Mutual explaining the circumstances:

My concerns lie primarily with the claims having been submitted in my name. The one document I have seen indicates incorrectly that I alone an the Insured, the Claimant and that Payment was made to me.

I had been ordered to endorse several checks from Liberty Mutual in court on July 18, 2011. I did this under duress and only when threatened with contempt and Ordered to endorse the checks by Judge Carolyn Carluccio. My request to obtain copies of the claims was ignored. I disavow any participation in any claim filed with Liberty Mutual. They were all filed by Sonya Healy without my knowledge or consent.

Sonya Healy obtained control of the house on June 9, 2011 through a court order. I had lived at the home alone since she abandoned the house in May 2007.

The Court Order is defective and an appeal had been filed. Judge Carolyn Carluccio continues to fail to take the appropriate action to permit the appeal to proceed to the Superior Court. As such, I will be filing with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to request that she be removed from the case and the appropriate hearings held to permit the appeal.

I assure you that I am not contacting you out of malice or anger towards my ex-wife. Every action by Sonya Healy and her attorneys since 2007 has involved misrepresentation and fraud.

In March 2008, I had filed a claim with Liberty Mutual for the damages when my wife, and a team of 20 people, using 12 suv’s and trucks, violated several court orders when they burglarized and vandalized the home and poisoned my dog. When police were called by neighbors, she presented a false court order written by her attorneys and the police permitted the robbery to continue. She was later found in contempt and orderd to return the items.

In September 2011, they neglected to inform the title company about the appeal. They were able to manipulate the fraudulent transfer of the deed to my house using a defective and expired power of attorney which was not properly executed or notarized.

I was prevented from obtaining any information about the entire sale process. The Real Estate agent, her manager and their attorney had been mislead into the belief that Court had ordered that I was not entitled to be included in any correspondence, or distribution of information regarding the sale of the home. I had written letters, emails, and went to the real estate office and was denied the information. This necessitated filing a petition with the court requesting they be ordered to provide the information.

Their misrepresentation of court ordered secrecy and confidentiality was admitted in a petition they filed on September 22, 2011 by my wife’s attorneys.

The hearing regarding my petition for the information was scheduled for September 20, 2011. At the ex parte request of my wife’s attorneys indicating the unavailability of my wife on that date, Judge Carolyn Carluccio immediately issued an order rescheduling the hearing for September 23, 2011.

At the September 23rd hearing, it was revealed that the continuance had been requested to allow her to attend the closing on the sale of the home. They had proceeded with the sale of the home with the full knowledge that they were operating under a defective order which was under appeal. I had informed the real estate agent and office of the appeal, and provided them copies of the paperwork, and had filed the letters sent to them with the court.

By law, a power of attorney requires the agent to inform the principal of any activity. It must be utilized and executed only in good faith with information shared with the principal. Their fraudulent misrepresentation of the power of attorney was enabled and endorsed by Judge Carolyn Carluccio with her participation in preventing any information regarding the closing date from being made available.

The following is why you are interested in the above information:

On July 18, 2011, Judge Carolyn Carluccio issued a verbal order which indicated that any of my possessions which were not removed by the closing date could be thrown in the trash. I was denied access to the property by the written order dated May 9, 2011. Four Sheriff’s deputies and four Montgomery Township police officers escorted Sonya to the home on June 9, 2011. I had been ordered to vacate the home by the May 9th order. I had done so. There has been no explanation of the purpose of the deputies and police. All parties deny requesting their involvement. The judge has refused to permit a hearing to determine what necessitated their presence. The County Sheriff has refused to provide any reports or orders which relate to their presence.

Due to the volume of false reports to police, I could not go to the house without a written order from the court for fear that police might be called as the only tangible court order indicated I had to vacate the property, I petitioned the court to provide a written court order which would allow me to retrieve my possessions. That petition was scheduled for September 23, 2011.

In late August, I discovered my possessions were being thrown in the trash. I reported it to police. They indicated they could not get involved and I should petiotion the court.

In early September, I drove by the house and there were teams of people taking truckloads of furniture from the house. When they realized it was me, they ran for the house and called police. I took a few pictures from the street and drove to McDonalds for breakfast. When I returned to further photograph the violation of the court order regarding assets, there were seven police cars in front of the house. They waved me down and dramatically ordered me to park. I explained that the activity going on violated the court orders and the police indicated they would not stop her. I also explained that I had no intention of arguing or debating, or even speaking with anyone involved. I was only going to take pictures to further document her actions in violation of court orders.

This action of my wife contacting police with another misrepresentation and false allegation was exactly the situation I had believed was intentionally being set in place with the judge and the lawyer actively participating to arrange it. Judge Carluccio issued a verbal court order which intentionally placed me at risk of a false report to police. When called to her attention on that day she refused to address the issue in her written order. I petitioned the court to address the issue and a hearing was scheduled for September 20, 2011, then continued to September 23, 2011. I further was required to pay for the transcript in order to obtain a tangible copy of the Court Order. It was available a few weeks later, however, by then even the verbal order was insuifficient to prevent an allegation and improper arrest.

On September 23, 2011, Valerie Angst placed Sonya Healy on the witness stand and had her proudly announce that she had sold my home. She followed that with indicating that she had thrown away all of my possessions, and furniture. They then proceeded to indicate that they did it in compliance with a court order which allowed the disposal of my possessions if not retrieved by the closing date on the home. The malicious intent of Judge Carluccio, Valerie Angst and Sonya Healy was clear.

Their actions were executed in bad faith, while an appeal was pending and intentionally being delayed by Judge Carluccio.

There is an additional series of letters initiated by Valerie Angst to prevent arbitration as had been ordered by the defective order. Valerie Angst indicated in her letter cancelling arbitration that the matter was scheduled to be heard on September 23, 2011, with the full knowledge of the closing on the home scheduled for September 20, 2011 had been set in late July when the Agreement of Sale was signed.

I would appreciate knowing if there is any allowance in the Homeowners policy which might permit me to file a claim for the loss of my furniture and all my other property.

For consideration:
Clearly Valerie Angst, Carolyn Carluccio and Sonya Healy have demonstrated undeniable malicious intent to enable, cause and/or perform the actions which resulted in the loss of my personal property. As in 2008, there were others participating in the illegal acts in violation of court orders occurring prior to the unknown deadline.

Does assumed participation of Sonya Healy in causing the loss, negate the my loss? Is this something to be documented?

Sonya Healy abandoned the home in May 2007 and has neglected to follow court orders requiring her to pay household expenses. She was not a resident at the house at any time since May 2007. There is a court order to that effect. The only reason her name remained on the policy was because her name was still on the mortgage. I paid the insurance bill, and had financial responsibility for the mortgagebill and the household expenses, even after ordered to vacate the home permit any consideration?

I would sincerely appreciate your consideration of those aspects. I would not seek to file a formal claim where there is no possibility of recompense for the loss. However, it may be necessary to go through with a formal claim as your independant investigation would provide a third party independant report indicating her responsibility in the loss, and additionally as the reason for the denial of the claim.

Your assistance is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Terance