A Terroristic Divorce

Ultrasonic noise since returning home the other day from court. There is no surviving the continued terror and harassment of Angst & Angst and their associates. Does anyone want to see a 4 foot fluorescent tube light up without use of electricity or wires… Stop by. It’ll light up like a light saber.

The invoice submitted to the court by Angst & Angst includes a reference to the date they decided to proceed forward… it coincides with the date I moved to Paris last year. Problem is, I didn’t move to Paris anywhere but on Facebook. Dumbasses! No wonder they were so shocked when I appeared in court. AND had filed a response. AND had served a response and counterpetition.

THEY HAD NOT FILED THE PAPERWORK PROPERLY, NOR had they served it, NOR had they filed the Certificate of Service.

Small wonder that Valerie Angst walked right into the courtroom thinking I was not going to appear… passed me in the hallway without so much as a glance… No reason to look for me there… The dumbass thought I was in Paris… because Facebook said so?

Add to that they tried to get Judge Carolyn Carluccio back on the case to railroad me right back into a 4th Order without Jurisdiction. Of course she would do that if I wasn’t in the country to expose her abuse of power under color of law. Carolyn Carluccio would gladly deny due process and procedure and urinate on civil rights. That’s not her concern.

Incompetence concealed by fraud.

Valerie Rosenbluth Angst, Esquire and Robert Angst, Esquire, of Angst & Angst in Harleysville, PA and Angst & Angst in Doylestown, PA wield their incompetence as a sword. They use their disgrace and shame as a shield against law, ethics, procedure and civil rights.

At the sake of honor and integrity, they are excused and even rewarded not for their ability but for absolute failure in a profession which requires the appearance of propriety.

After 7 years of perversion of justice, the court has witnessed the demonstration of the level of injustice which can be the result of giving false credence to a title.

Their only defense when their failures are clearly presented in a courtroom designed to protect them from aspersion is to accuse their victim of not being a lawyer.

7 years, 15 judges.

A Terroristic Divorce.

The Order of September 23, 2011

A voidable order is an order that must be declared void by a judge to be void; a void order is an order issued without jurisdiction by a judge and is void ab initio and does not have to be declared void by a judge to be void.

Only an inspection of the record of the case showing that the judge was without jurisdiction or violated a person’s due process rights, or where fraud was involved in the attempted procurement of jurisdiction, is sufficient for an order to be void. Potenz Corp. v. Petrozzini, 170 Ill. App. 3d 617, 525 N.E. 2d 173, 175 (1988).

In instances herein, the law has stated that the orders are void ab initio and not voidable because they are already void.

---

An Inspection of the Record – there is no way to understand the complete and absolute VOID-ness of the Order issued on September 23, 2011 without having the following breakdown. Without it, the intentional tactical failures becomes so chaotic that it begs to be ignored. With it, the proof that on the record of the case the judge lacked jurisdiction, violated the defendant’s due process rights and committed fraud is more than sufficient for the order to be VOID AB INITIO.

Three Main issues for review/inspection of the court record

1.) Last minute filing submitted, ordered, and withdrawn

2.) Sanctions Ordered against the Defendant

3.) Failure to conduct hearings/permit testimony

---

The Order of September 23, 2011

1.) Last minute filing submitted, ordered, and withdrawn

Plaintiff’s Petition titled:
PLAINTIFF SONYA HEALY’S RESPONSE TO PETITION REQUESTING DOCUMENTS AND INJUNCTION BLOCKING SALE OF HOME UNTIL APPEAL BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA HAS BEEN DECIDED
And;
COUNTERPETITION FOR JUDGE TO ORDER DISBURSEMENT OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE SALE OF THE MARITAL RESIDENCE AS WELL AS SANCTIONS FOR DEFENDANT’S FRIVOLOUS FILINGS, AND DECLARATORY ORDER PROHIBITING ANY FURTHER FILINGS UNDER THIS DIVORCE DOCKET

– was transmitted electronically to the Prothonotary on September 22, 2011 at 10:29 PM

– was accepted/docketed by the Prothonotary on September 23, 2011 at 9:17 AM

The Docket demonstrates the failure of the Plaintiff to serve the Defendant and file the related Certificate of Service.

The Order of September 23, 2011 does not reference the Plaintiff’s Petition yet grants the relief requested.

On September 28, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Plaintiff electronically filed PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW requesting the withdrawal of the “PENDING” Counterpetition.

Plaintiff did not serve the Counterpetition upon the Defendant prior to the hearing and failed to file a Certificate of Service indicating compliance with due process and procedure. Due Process and Procedure requires a petition to be properly filed and served upon a party prior to the hearing. The Court did not permit the Defendant any opportunity to prepare/present a response to the Counterpetition. When this failure of due process was pointed out by Defendant during the proceeding on September 23, 2011, the Defendant was ignored. The Court Order of September 23, 2011 granted requested relief relating to the Counterpetition. The Court was without jurisdiction and Denial of the Defendant’s due process rights is sufficient for an order to be void.

---

The Order of September 23, 2011

2.) Sanctions Ordered against the Defendant

Plaintiff’s Petition titled:
PLAINTIFF SONYA HEALY’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT TERANCE HEALY’S “EMERGENCY PETITION FOR INJUNCTION TO STAY/VACATE THE ORDER OF MAY 9, 2011 FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION’ AND COUNTER PETITION FOR SANCTIONS

– was transmitted electronically to the Prothonotary on July 14, 2011 at 8:55 AM

– seeking “Plaintiff to be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,000 for Defendant’s vexatious conduct.”

The Order of July 18, 2011 states:
A Protracted Hearing on Plaintiff’s counter Petition for Sanctions filed July 14, 2011 is scheduled for Friday September 23, 2011 from 10:30 a.m until noon.

The Docket demonstrates the failure of the Plaintiff to serve the Defendant and file the related Certificate of Service.

During the proceeding on September 23, 2011, there was an ex parte exchange of a document between Judge Carluccio and Valerie Angst. This ex parte exchange was called to the attention of the Court by the Defendant. The Defendant was ignored. The document was not provided to the Defendant.

The Order of September 23, 2011 states:
Plaintiff’s Counter Petition for Sanctions filed 7/14/11 is GRANTED. Defendant is ordered to pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees in the amount of $13,750 which shall be deducted from the Defendant’s share of the proceeds of the sale of the marital home.

The Court offered no explanation regarding the additional $10,750 that was added to the amount of the sanction.

Plaintiff did not serve the Counterpetition upon the Defendant prior to the hearing and failed to file a Certificate of Service indicating compliance with due process and procedure. Plaintiff failed to demonstrate any vexatious behavior by the Defendant or indicate which petitions were filed unnecessarily. The defendants only recourse to enforce Plaintiff to comply with court orders was to petition the court for enforcement. The Court was without jurisdiction and Denial of the Defendant’s due process rights is sufficient for an order to be void. The Courts participation and failure to correct the ex parte communication creates the appearance of impropriety sufficient for an order to be void The Order of September 23, 2011

---

The Order of September 23, 2011

3.) Failure to conduct hearings/permit testimony

The Protracted hearing on September 23, 2011 was ordered on July 18, 2011
“A Protracted Hearing on Plaintiff’s counter Petition for Sanctions filed July 14, 2011 is scheduled for Friday September 23, 2011 from 10:30 a.m until noon.”

1.5 Hours were scheduled for the hearing.

The docket shows that there was no Certificate of Service for the Plaintiff’s Counter Petition for Sanctions filed 7/14/11.

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

On July 21, 2011 Defendant filed:
PETITION REQUESTING AN IMMEDIATE STAY/RESCHEDULING REGARDING THE ORDER OF JULY 18, 2011 AS THE INCOMPLETE WRITTEN ORDER PLACES THE DEFENDANT IN JEOPARDY

The Court had issued a verbal order into the record. The transcript would not be available for weeks.
The Defendant believed be would be subjected to arrest for following the verbal order as the available printed documents indicated he must vacate the property.

Police called when Defendant was photographing the Plaintiff’s dissipation of assets in August 2011 and September 2011

On August 17, 2011, the Short List was scheduled for September 20, 2011. *

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

On August 15, 2011 Defendant filed (concurrent with the filing of an Appeal):
Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

On August 15, 2011, Defendant filed an Appeal of the defective Order of May 9, 2011 (Divorce Decree & Equitable Distribution)

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

On August 19, 2011 Defendant filed:
Petition Requesting the Scheduling of Outstanding Petitions

This Petition recapped the number of petitions which remained unheard by the court.

Since the August 12, 2010 discovery of a Secret, Ex Parte, Undocketed and Undistributed Order issued by Judge Rhonda Daniele, Petitions submitted by the Defendant were no longer heard.
On August 30, 2011 Defendant filed:
Petition Requesting Distribution/Docketing of Ex Parte Court Order

While seeking Police intervention of the Plaintiff’s dissipation of Assets (which was denied), Defendant learned that Montgomery Township Police were requested by the Montgomery County Deputies to assist in ensuring that the Defendant had vacated the Property on June 9, 2011.

Montgomery County Sheriff Eileen Behr has refused to provide any information.

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

On August 31, 2011 Defendant filed:
Petition Requesting Documents and Injunction Blocking Sale of the Home Until Appeal by The Superior Court of Pennsylvania Has Been Decided

Plaintiff was failing to provide any information regarding the Sale of the Home – a violation of Power Of Attorney. The Real estate Agent would not Provide any information. The verbal order of July 18, 2011 had ordered removal of the Defendant’s property by the closing date of the home. Defendant was not disclosing that date. The Appeal had been filed and no action had been taken with regard to supersedeas or stays while the appeal is pending.

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

On September 1, 2011 Defendant filed: (AS EMERGENCY)
Petition Requesting Documents and Injunction Blocking Sale of the Home Until Appeal by The Superior Court of Pennsylvania Has Been Decided

On September 1, 2011 Defendant filed:
Petition Regarding the Scheduling of Outstanding Petitions

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

On September 2, 2011 Defendant filed:
Petition for the Recusal of Judge Carolyn Carluccio

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

On September 6, 2011, on the faxed Request of the Plaintiff, Judge Carluccio IMMEDIATELY continued the hearing scheduled for September 20, 2011 to September 23, 2011 to accommodate the Plaintiff’s inability to appear.

On August 17, 2011 The DEFENDANT PETITION REQUESTING AN IMMEDIATE STAY had been scheduled for September 20, 2011.

Closing Date for the house had been set on July 24, 2011 and signed/accepted by Plaintiff on July 27, 2011.

The Closing date was scheduled for September 20, 2011.

Plaintiff intentionally prevented the Defendant from knowing the closing date. A violation of Power of Attorney law.

Keller Williams Real Estate Agent, Chris Grucella had deliberately and intentionally prevented the Defendant from knowing the closing date.

Keller Williams Real Estate has deliberately and intentionally prevented the Defendant from knowing the closing date.

It is not unreasonable to suggest that Plaintiff had informed Angst & Angst of her reason for being “unable to attend” on September 20, 2011.

Angst & Angst were deliberately and intentionally creating an appearance of impropriety for Judge Carluccio.

Judge Carluccio did endorse and encourage the an appearance of impropriety by her immediate response to the faxed continuance request without any opportunity for the Defendant to object.

On September 23, 2011, while reviewing the above information, when the appearance of impropriety became undeniable and evident, Judge Carluccio interrupted the Defendant’s review of information denying any wrongdoing prior to the issue of impropriety even being raised.

As part of the continuance Order, the following petitions were additionally scheduled for September 23, 2011:

PETITION REQUESTING AN IMMEDIATE STAY/RESCHEDULING REGARDING THE ORDER OF JULY 18, 2011 AS THE INCOMPLETE WRITTEN ORDER PLACES THE DEFENDANT IN JEOPARDY (filed July 21, 2011)

PETITION REGARDING THE SCHEDULING OF OUTSTANDING PETITIONS
(filed September 1, 2011)

PETITION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE CAROLYN CARLUCCIO
(filed September 2, 2011)

Even though the three additional petitions were added for the date, no additional time was provided on the court schedule.

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

On September 12, 2011, the following petitions were additionally scheduled for September 23, 2011:

PETITION REQUESTING DISTRIBUTION/DOCKETING OF EX PARTE COURT ORDER (filed August 30, 2011)

PETITION REQUESTING DOCUMENTS AND INJUNCTION BLOCKING SALE OF THE HOME UNTIL APPEAL BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA HAS BEEN DECIDED (filed August 31, 2011)

Even though the two additional petitions were added for the date, no additional time was provided on the court schedule.

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

On September 23, 2011, the following items were to set to be heard within a 90 minute Protracted Hearing:

PLAINTIFF’S COUNTER PETITION FOR SANCTIONS (filed July 14, 2011)

PETITION REQUESTING AN IMMEDIATE STAY/RESCHEDULING REGARDING THE ORDER OF JULY 18, 2011 AS THE INCOMPLETE WRITTEN ORDER PLACES THE DEFENDANT IN JEOPARDY (filed July 21, 2011)

PETITION REGARDING THE SCHEDULING OF OUTSTANDING PETITIONS (filed September 1, 2011)

PETITION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE CAROLYN CARLUCCIO (filed September 2, 2011)

PETITION REQUESTING DISTRIBUTION/DOCKETING OF EX PARTE COURT ORDER (filed August 30, 2011)

PETITION REQUESTING DOCUMENTS AND INJUNCTION BLOCKING SALE OF THE HOME UNTIL APPEAL BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA HAS BEEN DECIDED (filed August 31, 2011)

The following had not yet been scheduled:
Defendant’s PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (filed August 15, 2011 concurrent with APPEAL)

Defendant’s RESUBMISSION: PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (filed September 19, 2011)

The Appeal was in process and Judge Carluccio had acknowledged that in an Order for a Concise statement.

BUT INSTEAD…

The Judge heard testimony ONLY on the petition filed immediately before the hearing, given to the Defendant AT the hearing, and never properly served,
AND withdrawn immediately after the proceeding titled:

PLAINTIFF SONYA HEALY’S RESPONSE TO PETITION REQUESTING DOCUMENTS AND INJUNCTION BLOCKING SALE OF HOME UNTIL APPEAL BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA HAS BEEN DECIDED
And;
COUNTERPETITION FOR JUDGE TO ORDER DISBURSEMENT OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE SALE OF THE MARITAL RESIDENCE AS WELL AS SANCTIONS FOR DEFENDANT’S FRIVOLOUS FILINGS, AND DECLARATORY ORDER PROHIBITING ANY FURTHER FILINGS UNDER THIS DIVORCE DOCKET

And the Judge issued her Order granting all of the releif requested in THAT documented and denied and dismissed all of the petitions properly filed, served and prepared.

– –  –   –    –     –      –       –        –       –      –     –    –   –  –

IT WAS CLEAR THAT FURTHER INJUSTICE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE THEIR GOAL OF THE DEFENDANT’S SUICIDE. The Defendant was surrounded by 7 deputies during the September 23, 2011 proceeding. They were going to intimidate him to the point of emotional breakdown. I stood strong as I endured their corruption, injustice, lawlessness and intimidation.

The ultimate problem… I am not capable of suicide. And, I am a survivor.

Judge Carolyn Carluccio would never hold the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis which would then permit the Appeal to move forward. How could she entertain that hearing? Wouldn’t the Court be embarrassed after having caused one party to be destitute, and homeless, to issue an order admitting it?

You cannot appeal what you do not know exists. When they keep an order a secret. You cannot appeal it.

When THAT Secret Order undermines the judiciary while custody proceedings are going on… you have no way of appealing the orders. UNTIL you find the secret order. Then, they ramp up the terror and injustice by denying all hearings outright.

The Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit is becoming clearer and clearer.

Not only have they denied my rights to a hearing, BUT they have denied my rights to appeal to a higher court… And that is just on the Secret Order of Judge Rhonda Daniele. Because of the initial prevention of my rights in August 2007, it became necessary to ensure that my rights to an appeal of any order were prevented in 2011. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE COURT HAS DONE.. and is doing in 2013.

The crimes of the Montgomery County Court: their deliberate and intentional denial of my civil rights, their abuse of power under color of law, and their intentional and malicious prevention of an Appeal to a higher court, while using their power and influence to manipulate other county offices to inaction and harassment. Montgomery County is becoming more and more exposed. Their malicious intent is becoming more and more clear.

The Federal law suit is writing itself… and when we include all of the County Departments used to annihilate my life… the damages will grow… and grow.

The Secret Order of Judge Rhonda Daniele has undermined justice in this case from the beginning… and once discovered it undermined my civil rights entirely. But they wanted my suicide at the hopelessness of escaping their terror.

And I am not capable of suicide. I was forced to live each day to face further terror and hopelessness at the corrupt hands of the Montgomery County Courts and Departments. The Terrorists in Montgomery County are exposed… all that remains is the filing of the paperwork in Federal Court.

And somewhere along the way law enforcement will prosecute the corrupt judges and lawyers who were not acting as judges when they did their malce. The law protects judges and grants them immunity, BUT only when they act as judges. When they fail to do so, they lose their immunity. They are personally responsible for their civil rights crimes… and the terror they inflicted on the litigant before them… and the list of litigants terrorized by Montgomery County will likely grow once my story makes the local news.

On February 11, 2013, Judge Garrett Page, after 3 hours of ridiculously tedious testimony by the Plaintiff exposing her absolute failure to follow any court orders AND exposing the complete denial of due process of the Defendant (me),…

The judge admonished Valerie Angst indicating she should have informed the court that the hearings had not taken place and that more time would be required for the hearing.

[I had not even begun to present my case AND MY case had been made by the plaintiff and her boasting about how she did what she wanted without any regard for court orders, or the law. My case would prove beyond any doubt the contempt for the court, and her contempt for the law… and her corruption of the judiciary to obtain favorable rulings.]

Valerie responded (by shouting) indicating the judge “did not follow the plan. did not stick to the petition. did not follow the order.”

DID NOT FOLLOW THE PLAN???? WOW, them’s fighting words and that is exactly how they came out. Valerie was exposing Judge Garrett Page in his own courtroom and OUTLOUD – FULL VOLUME DISRESPECTFULLY SHOUTING.
– With Judge Carluccio, she was more subtle sticking to violating procedures and ex parte communications and extortion. She handed her a document indicating that if she wasn’t awarded an extra 10,000 dollars, then the Defendant would get the invoice listing all of the ex parte contact with the judge. Either Judge Carluccio ignored, endorsed and participated in Ex Parte Communication in her own court and on the record, or she was exposed for her prior ex parte contact and the related conspiracy with the prior judges. Judge Carluccio increased the amount ordered by $10,000 from the amount requested $3,000.
– Same as she did with Judge Bertin, but she had revealed that invoice ‘accidentally’ during equitable distribution.
– With Judge DelRicci they simply presented the secret order issued by Judge Daniele which was not provided to the defendant (me).
– This was also done with Judge Tilson when they gave him a completely different document than they filed… sneaking in their secret order – TRUMPED!
– All of these things would be included in my presentation…. with full documentation straight from the court records.

Judge Page then ended the hearing. He’d been exposed.

EXPOSED… well that is how Valerie makes every judge do her bidding. They will do it or she will expose their corruption.

How can you protect a judiciary with no integrity? You can’t.

How can you obtain a fair trial when the integrity of a dozen judges hangs in the balance? You cannot.

You get terrorized more and more as the pattern continues.

No one will stop the corrupt lawyer who can, will, and DOES expose the corrupt judge doing her bidding.

They (the judiciary and the Angsts) made the situation. They continue it. I get harassed and terrorized for surviving in their melee.

You cannot protect the integrity of the judiciary when they lack integrity… and they are conspiring with a sociopathic lawyer who will expose them at every turn. Survive at your own risk… BUT, they are determined to destroy you…

[It took only a few minutes until this document was being read from Norristown, PA.]

The laughable actions of Michael Kehs, Montgomery County Court Administrator to obstruct justice and deny due process become more and more evident in each action he takes.

You have played this game too many times already… AND FAILED. Do you think I will be so stupid to fall for the tactics just because you continue to try them?

You may order your staff to do what you like. They are prevented by the county’s unethical “Code of Ethical Conduct” from exposing your secrets. They may not report the crimes you are committing. The threat which keeps them employed and used as tools of the conspiracy.

How do you suppose this effort won’t backfire like the last? When the dishonorable and corrupt Judge Carolyn Carluccio ordered me to appear in her courtroom, and cancelled the appearance at 4:00 the afternoon before with no notice. THEN, She notified County Deputies that I had no purpose being in the Courthouse. And was supposedly threatening her. Ridiculous false allegations. (Who brings their 70+ year old mother with them to court to threaten anyone?) When I presented the Scheduling Order to the deputies they were confused because the judge had lied to them. The judge had set me up.

The judge had also secretly cancelled all of the hearings by email without notifying the parties… On paper she had only cancelled one of them. A silly paperwork error which would permit them to dismiss all petitions filed. SO that when I would not appear for the event, ALL of my petitions would be dismissed for non-appearance. It failed when I showed up prepared to present the case on the 10 or so outstanding petitions.

And Michael Kehs also ordered me to appear for hearings which the Angst’s and the Plaintiff failed to appear for. How did they know there was no real hearing scheduled? They blamed Admin. BUT, when Angsts’ then billed me for their fees and intentionally included the time they spent conspiring with the court in ex parte contact. Judge Bertin immediately recused without explanation when this was revealed in the hearing before the Master. When dealing with sociopaths you can expect them to turn on their own teammates. Angst & Angst have exposed everyone they have involved once they were no longer needed.

For the record, Angst & Angst have documented that they have no concept of the ethics involved in ex parte communications. They don’t know what it is, and apparently neither do the judges with whom they conspire.

Judge Carolyn Carluccio laughed and accused the Defendant of not understanding ex parte communication. She was wrong. Her lies and outright fraud are a part of the record. But she was determined not to recuse, no matter how many times I tried to protect her from herself. She was determined to destroy me. She failed at that too… and her evil nature was exposed.

Judge Carolyn Carluccio refused to hold the hearing where the Court was petitioned to provide the content of those meetings and conversations. Her secret emails submitted as precipe and never distributed to the parties have yet to be provided. She was caught on the record, in her own courtroom. Exposed. She then rescheduled the secretly cancelled hearings on the record in her court… only to cancel them again without notice. The county conspiracy and their tactics to prevent and obsrtuct justice, to deny due process, to commit crimes aand for the judiciary to become an intensely involved party in a divorce not only demonstrate bias. It exposes their deliberate and intentional abuse of power under color of law.

Last week the Philadelphia Traffic Court experienced the exposure of their criminal judiciary. This week, let’s hope it is time for Montgomery County to be exposed for the terroristic criminal organization that it has become. A corrupt judiciary. A criminally dismissive District Attorney who violates the law and her oath of office. A frightened sheriff who fears what the powerful people in her county would do to her if she acted in the proper context of her office as chief law enforcement officer in the county.

And the rubber stamping Court Administrator Michael Kehs, who hides behind his stamp pad and his court administration and his family court administration… who hasn’t figured out that people are not as stupid as the court thinks they are. And the Judge responsible for Court Admionistration who thinks he has no control over his schedule.

The tremendous disrespect for the litigants which come before Montgomery County Court and are subjected to fraud and bullying and mistatements by persons in authority. Problems is, just because they are in a position to abuse their power, their lies do not become TRUTH.

And the TRUTH is waiting it’s opportunity to be heard. And no matter how long that opportunity will be denied, the TRUTH WILL BE WAITING.

And the little game of making the schedule an issue, doesn’t completely distract from the lack of jurisdiction now, in September 2011, in July 2011, and in May 2011. A nested lack of jurisdiction will never provide for failure of the court to have jurisdiction, and the prevention of the Appeal filed timely and properly which has yet to be sent to the Superior Court. There can be no retroactive jurisdiction. And the continued terror to cover up the corruption of the court only involves more and more judges because the corruption is causing them to feed on each other.

Judge DelRicci could have resolved it, BUT he chose to act unethically, hide the proof, maintain the conspiracy and then recuse. He caused the further involvement of the next judge, who was additionally protecting him. And so on and so on…

The Judicial Conduct Board could have prevented this disgrace, BUT THEY CHOSE NOT TO ACT.

And Judge Rhonda Daniele, whom I have never met or seen, could have prevented this by not issuing multiple secret court orders. Her actions have caused the complete corruption of the judicary in her Family Court division… AND INSTEAD OF TAKING RESPONSIBILITY SHE CONTINUES THE CONSPIRACY AND TERROR. Judge Rhonda Daniele has undermined justice, coerced the abuse of power under color of law of the judicary in her division of the court… and remained hidden behind the robes of a disgraced judiciary.

I fear my murder, because they have not been able to attain my suicide. The TRUTH will not die with me thought it might be easy for them to disregard the truth as they have disregarded the law and their oath.

The Honorable Judge Garrett D. Page
Montgomery County Court House
2 East Airy Street
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311

Re: Healy v Healy
Docket# 2007-12477

January 16, 2013

Your Honor,

I apologize for the late timing of this letter. My brothers and sister and I have been called to travel to Florida as my father has been re-admitted to hospital on Tuesday and is dying.

I am respectfully requesting a continuance of the protracted hearing scheduled for January 17, 2013 so that I may travel as quickly as possible to be with my family.

As the matter before you is not ripe for resolution, has been pending since July 2012, and is attempting to enforce an order which is being appealed, my family and I would sincerely appreciate your rescheduling of the matter.

Additionally, I have filed an Appeal regarding your Order of January 3, 2013 as Court Administration has yet to schedule that matter on your calendar.

This matter has been ongoing since 2007. It should be noted that I have only asked for and been granted one continuance while my mother was undergoing emergency heart surgery. That continuance was opposed by Plaintiff’s counsel. Upon arrival in court, Judge DelRicci granted the continuance and ordered me to the hospital with my family where I belonged.

I await your approval on the continuance so that travel arrangements can be completed. I can be contacted at (215)343-1686.

Sincerely,

Terance Healy

Appeal PDF file with attachments.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Terance Healy :
(Appellant) :
:
v. : Docket Number 2007-12477

Sonya Healy
(Appellee)

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Terance Healy, Defendant, Appellant named above hereby appeals to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania from the order entered on this matter on the 3rd day of January, 2013.

ORDER

1. The Order of 3rd January, 2013 is a one page document indicating the Judge Page has deemed the petition is not an emergency, and Court Administration is directed to schedule this in due course.

PROCEDURE

2. As of January 16, 2013, the order has not been distributed to the Appellant.

3. As of January 16, 2013, Court Administration has not scheduled the matter as ordered.

4. There has been no proceeding on this matter.

ORDER OF EVENTS

5. The Petition titled EMERGENCY OBJECTION TO THE REASSIGNMENT OF THIS MATTER / PETITION TO ENFORCE THE SCHEDULING ORDER OF JULY 10, 2012
was filed timely, docketed by the Prothonotary, and properly served upon Appellee.

7. The Petition was filed in response to a Scheduling/Reassignment Order which was issued by Michael Kehs, Court Administrator on December 13, 2012.

8. The Scheduling Order assigned a hearing date of January 17, 2013, yet fails to include the Appellants Response and Counterpetition in the citation.

9. Court Administration has failed to schedule the matter to date.

HISTORY

10. The scheduled/reassigned proceeding relates to a petition filed by Appellee on May 18, 2012 and May 23, 2012 seeking enforcement of an Order.

11. At the July 10, 2012 proceeding before Judge Haaz, it was revealed that Angst & Angst had failed to properly serve and file the documents relating to the matter upon the Appellant, Terance Healy.

12. Service of the documents was performed during the proceeding and as such provided proper jurisdiction for the Court to conduct a hearing on the matter. An Order was issued for Court Administration to schedule a hearing.

12. Court Administration has failed to schedule the hearing as ordered by Judge Haaz on July 10, 2012.

PENDING APPEAL

13. An Appeal filed on August 15, 2011, docketed by the Prothonotary and served timely upon the parties and the judiciary is currently pending on the matter.

14. On August 22, 2011, the Court ordered a Concise Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal.

15. On September 15, 2011, a CONCISE STATEMENT OF ERRORS COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL was filed with the Court and served upon the judge and the parties.

16. The Prothonotary has failed to prepare and forward the documents relating to the Appeal to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania for consideration.

JURISDICTION

17. As the Appeal is pending, any petition for enforcement of the Order, and/or subsequent orders issued without proper jurisdiction, is not ripe for consideration by the Court.

As such, Terance Healy, Defendant, Appellant above named, hereby appeals to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

A copy of the docket is attached.

Terance Healy
Pro Se

c/o Joan Healy
871 Mustang Road
Warrington, PA 18976
215-343-1686

The easiest way to prevent litigation (or at least hinder timely submission of documents) is TO HACK INTO THE COMPUTER OF THE LITIGANTS. The lawyers know this already. My original lawyer knew it well. Sara Armstrong explained to me exactly how the WEBWATCHER software had been detected on her computer. BUT, A Pro Se litigant is left exposed and vulnerable.

And here is how it happens…. “Mont Co Style”

And when a litigant tries to access the Court Docket they MUST submit to the Court’s web site demand to install a certificate which undermines security measures and permits remote access to the entire computer.

Once access is gained, it’s no small problem to prevent necessary PDF files from being created, or filed, or adding routines to ‘reverse auto-correction” to misspell words… computers give up full remote control. Even for the placement of files which could be deemed incriminating, and unexplainable because you have no idea how they got there.

I’ve notified the Court of their Certificate problem for years. Since I noticed it. They have made no effort to fix it. The digital certificate expired in 2008. This is not an it just expired yesterday issue. It expired YEARS ago. IT HAS BEEN EXPIRED FOR YEARS. Even a random update would have corrected the issue. It must be ‘broken’ intentionally.

I’ve told them in email… and in person… to desk personnel and supervisors… and over the phone… BUT still no action taken.
August 19, 2011 Courthouse web site – Invalid Certificates
January 2, 2013 County Web Site Use Requires Security Hack

A few weeks ago, I had no alternative but to permit the certificate to be installed on my computer. I had to reformat/rebuild the computer the other night. It was unable to accomplish simple actions any longer. I had no choice, as I needed to file electronically. EMERGENCY OBJECTION TO THE REASSIGNMENT OF THIS MATTER / PETITION TO ENFORCE THE SCHEDULING ORDER OF JULY 10, 2012

The Court has utilized it’s insight.

I recall that Judge Del Ricci announced his SURPRISE recusal with the future effective date just as I was printing the 25 page petition requesting his recusal. I had been unable to print for a week without any reason. Then, the letter from Judge Del Ricci arrived announcing he would recuse in 2 weeks. More scheduling games, it had been months since he continued a hearing to a future (and never scheduled) date.

How did Judge DelRicci know I was about to ask for his recusal?
Did he also know that I had edited the document down from 125 pages to 25? It tooks weeks to write the document. Research. Law Citations. Ethics Citations. That level of detail of his injustice was never filed because it suddenly wasn’t necessary. His letter announcing his recusal prevented him from being embarassed and exposed for the injustice and abuse of power demonstrated in his courtroom. His letter prevented the judicary from being exposed to the scandal.

But S E R I O U S L Y, how did he know what was coming? Surveillance programs? Review his speech / testimony as he announced his recusal from the bench. He admits to many ethics violations, and threatens ME with a lawsuit for some document he never identified. Review the Annotated version.

Reading the annotated version NOW after finding the secret order of Judge Rhonda Daniele, the head of the Family Court division with whom Judge DelRicci consulted. The evidence that Judge DelRicci concealed Daniele’s Secret Order during a conference only makes the judges actions all the more evident and completely reprehensible. In his own words Judge DelRicci has admitted to a conspiracy with Judge Daniele. In other hearings – Judge DelRicci admitted to conspiracy with the Montgomery Township Poice Department to prevent prosecution for burglary.

It’s obvious that he knew MY Request for his Recusal was coming… his statement all but refers to it. BUT THAT DOCUMENT ONLY EXISTED ON MY COMPUTER, AND YET HE REFERS TO IT AS IF IT IS FILED AND PUBLIC.?

Knowing now what I did not know then… Judge DelRicci is the judge who oversees/oversaw court administration. if ever there was a judge who could control his own schedule it was Judge DelRicci.

---

Montgomery County’s Web Site requires a Security hack. WHY?

Why when it was brought to their attention did they do nothing?

Why when it was emailed did they do nothing?

Why has Mark Levy, the Prothonotary, and an elected official, done nothing? His was the office where the Secret order of Judge Rhonda Daniele was hidden and available only to the Judges and Masters. Until that one day in August 2010 when the file was accidentally given to me.

The Prothonotary also changed the rules when it was revealed that Judge Carolyn Carluccio LIED when she indicated she performed an extensive review of the case… Court Documents revealed she never had the file checked out during her review. When you look at JUST the Docketed Paperwork it fills 5 Binders? Once her lie was exposed, the sign-out sheet was no longer available to the public. See Docket # 2007-12477-303 The Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice has involved the Prothonotary all along.

Why is Installation of a Certificate which expired in 2008 STILL a required action to use the County Web Site? (As of January 2013, STILL REQUIRED)

---

Now, recall the early news reports from Lower Merion School District. When the school was caught using the remote cameras on students laptops and taking pictures of their very private lives… the District had been helped by the County in developing the ‘solution’. The only reason they got caught is because the ‘watcher’ had a fiduciary responsibility to report what was thought to be illegal drug use… Skittles? Even if it was illegal drug use, instead of candy, it demonstrated the Drug Task force had the capability to conduct stealth surveillance into the families and lives of children.

The tools were made available to township police under DEA programs and was explained in documents issued by The White House.
2003 COUNTERDRUG RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BLUEPRINT UPDATE
Technology Transfer Program READ THE LAST TWO PAGS AND COMPARE IT TO THIS SITE. I’ve documented the terror caused and methods of detection and survival by the devices listed.

Montgomery County is quite knowledgable when it comes to legal and illegal surveillance techniques… How many ex parte conversations, ex parte orders and search warrants were issued by the judges assigned to my case? Their intent to hinder and terrorize and entrap… and they weren’t able to set me up, so they decided to destroy. AND THEY ARE STILL TRYING.