A Terroristic Divorce

( PDF )

1. After service of the EMERGENCY PRAECIPE file with this Court on October 15, 2013, Plaintiff’s 80-year old mother was contacted by telephone multiple times by the Montgomery Township Police Department.

2. Montgomery Township Police Office Ruchkin has threatened the plaintiff with arrest if he approached his own property at 110 Banbury Avenue North Wales, PA 19454.

3. Plaintiff has taken no aggressive or violent action against the Defendants and as such, the threats to his freedom from Montgomery Township are unwarranted, unnecessary and unlawful.

4. Defendants have misrepresented ownership to Montgomery Township Police and have manipulated them into actions which are clearly an abuse of power under color of law.

5. As the Plaintiff is unaware of any allegation of criminal charges, the Montgomery Townnship Police have no jurisdiction in this civil matter.

6. THREATS TO THE SAFETY AND LIBERTY OF THE PLAINTIFF WARRANT THI COURTS IMMEDIATE ATTENTION.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff respectfully requests this honorable Court issue an EX PARTE ORDER FOR POSSESSION authorizing the Sheriff’s Department to take immediate action to remove, eject and prevent the Defendants from occupying the property and residence.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy

Emergency Praecipe for Immediate Eviction / Order of Possession( PDF )

Emergency Praecipe for Immediate Eviction/Order of Possession (Addendum)( PDF )

Defendant’s Preliminary Objections and Defendant’s Memorandum of Law ( PDF )

Plaintiff Responds to Defendant’s Preliminary Objections and Defendant’s Memorandum of Law
( PDF )

18 Pa.C.S. § 507: Use of force for the protection of property

(a) Use of force justifiable for protection of property.–The use of force upon or toward the person of another is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is immediately necessary:
(1) to prevent or terminate an unlawful entry or other trespass upon land or a trespass against or the unlawful carrying away of tangible movable property, if such land or movable property is, or is believed by the actor to be, in his possession or in the possession of another person for whose protection he acts; or
(2) to effect an entry or reentry upon land or to retake tangible movable property, if:
(i) the actor believes that he or the person by whose authority he acts or a person from whom he or such other person derives title was unlawfully dispossessed of such land or movable property and is entitled to possession; and
(ii) (A) the force is used immediately or on fresh pursuit after such dispossession; or
(B) the actor believes that the person against whom he uses force has no claim of right to the possession of the property and, in the case of land, the circumstances, as the actor believes them to be, are of such urgency that it would be an exceptional hardship to postpone the entry or reentry until a court order is obtained.

(b) Meaning of possession.–For the purpose of subsection (a) of this section:
(1) A person who has parted with the custody of property to another who refuses to restore it to him is no longer in possession, unless the property is movable and was and still is located on land in his possession.
(2) A person who has been dispossessed of land does not regain possession thereof merely by setting foot thereon.
(3) A person who has a license to use or occupy real property is deemed to be in possession thereof except against the licensor acting under claim of right.

(c) Limitations on justifiable use of force.–
(1) The use of force is justifiable under this section only if the actor first requests the person against whom such force is used to desist from his interference with the property, unless the actor believes that:
(i) such request would be useless;
(ii) it would be dangerous to himself or another person to make the request; or
(iii) substantial harm will be done to the physical condition of the property which is sought to be protected before the request can effectively be made.
(2) The use of force to prevent or terminate a trespass is not justifiable under this section if the actor knows that the exclusion of the trespasser will expose him to substantial danger of serious bodily injury.
(3) The use of force to prevent an entry or reentry upon land or the recaption of movable property is not justifiable under this section, although the actor believes that such reentry or caption is unlawful, if:
(i) the reentry or recaption is made by or on behalf of a person who was actually dispossessed of the property; and
(ii) it is otherwise justifiable under subsection (a)(2).
(4) (i) The use of deadly force is justifiable under this section if:
(A) there has been an entry into the actor’s dwelling;
(B) the actor neither believes nor has reason to believe that the entry is lawful; and
(C) the actor neither believes nor has reason to believe that force less than deadly force would be adequate to terminate the entry.
(ii) If the conditions of justification provided in subparagraph (i) have not been met, the use of deadly force is not justifiable under this section unless the actor believes that:
(A) the person against whom the force is used is attempting to dispossess him of his dwelling otherwise than under a claim of right to its possession; or
(B) such force is necessary to prevent the commission of a felony in the dwelling.

(d) Use of confinement as protective force.–The justification afforded by this section extends to the use of confinement as protective force only if the actor takes all reasonable measures to terminate the confinement as soon as he knows that he can do so with safety to the property, unless the person confined has been arrested on a charge of crime.

(e) Use of device to protect property.–The justification afforded by this section extends to the use of a device for the purpose of protecting property only if:
(1) the device is not designed to cause or known to create a substantial risk of causing death or serious bodily injury;
(2) the use of the particular device to protect the property from entry or trespass is reasonable under the circumstances, as the actor believes them to be; and
(3) the device is one customarily used for such a purpose or reasonable care is taken to make known to probable intruders the fact that it is used.

(f) Use of force to pass wrongful obstructor.–The use of force to pass a person whom the actor believes to be intentionally or knowingly and unjustifiably obstructing the actor from going to a place to which he may lawfully go is justifiable, if:
(1) the actor believes that the person against whom he uses force has no claim of right to obstruct the actor;
(2) the actor is not being obstructed from entry or movement on land which he knows to be in the possession or custody of the person obstructing him, or in the possession or custody of another person by whose authority the obstructor acts, unless the circumstances, as the actor believes them to be, are of such urgency that it would not be reasonable to postpone the entry or movement on such land until a court order is obtained; and
(3) the force used is not greater than it would be justifiable if the person obstructing the actor were using force against him to prevent his passage.

( PDF )

1. Plaintiff respectfully requests the immediate action of this court to remove the defendant’s from his home and property and restore possession to the rightful, proper and legal owner of the home.

2. The evidence of fraud and deception in every document and activity relating to the conveyance of the property warrants immediate action.

3. There is reason to believe that the property and residence will be irreparably damaged or destroyed as: the fraudulent conveyance of the title is evident and the defendants cannot demonstrate or present any valid or correct title or deed or right to possession of the property and residence.

4. Defendants have been served with NOTICE, and the property posted, regarding trespassing on July 26, 2013.

5. Defendants have been served the Civil Complaint filed in this matter on October 3, 2013. This is confirmed by signed certified receipt from the US Post Office on October 4, 2013.

6. plaintiff has presented in the Civil Complaint the documents which demonstrate his rightful, lawful ownership of the property and residence.

WHEREAS, plaintiff respectfully requests this honorable Court issue an Ex Parte Order for Possession authorizing the Sheriff’s Department to take immediate action to remove, eject and prevent the Defendants from occupying the property and residence.

Respectfully

Terance Healy

Emergency Praecipe for Immediate Eviction / Order of Possession( PDF )

Emergency Praecipe for Immediate Eviction/Order of Possession (Addendum)( PDF )

Defendant’s Preliminary Objections and Defendant’s Memorandum of Law ( PDF )

Plaintiff Responds to Defendant’s Preliminary Objections and Defendant’s Memorandum of Law
( PDF )

… a multifaceted approach. Sign the petition to restore judicial integrity and the rights of the People.

The Petition can have no legal effect, BUT it will inform our government that we are aware of what happened and demand their full cooperation and support.

And if they are lawyers… choosing to stand in our way is repugnant to OUR CONSTITUTION… they best get out of the way! JUSTICE IS COMING.

The victims experienced the loss of the Constitution first. But no one would listen. Everyone who hears the wide spread stories of the death of the Constitution know the feeling, but are unsure of how it could have happened.

How can so many people ignore the loss of constitutionally protected rights and liberties. How can the government lawfully fail to investigate. How does this deliberate and intentional neglect to recognize the loss of rights HAPPEN IN AMERICA?

It was necessary to find the answer, the cause, the reason. Everyone felt their neglectful actions were lawful. There was that, and ONE OTHE THING which they ALL had in common.

RULE 1.6. Caused it… and kept it secret. MANDATED THE SECRECY. PREVENTING ANY RESOLUTION.

RULE 1.6 Confidentiality of Information punished any who dared make any attempt to expose the sedition caused by this law. This law illegally enacted by the judiciary which prevented prosecution of judicial misconduct – judicial crime – judicial retaliation.

The author of the RULE, the American Bar Association, became the largest and most corrupt racketeering organization in the history of the United States. And their lawyers are preventing the media from carrying this story.

They took our homes. They took our children. They took our families. They took our friends. They took our liberty.

… with Liberty and Justice for all. JUSTICE IS COMING!

Notify your representatives, your senators, your governor, your federal officials… tell them about the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules Of Professional Conduct. (YES, THE SAME EXACT NAME IN EVERY STATE. REALLY.) Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional, destructive, and unjust. Americans demand the restoration of your civil rights and liberties!

JUSTICE IS COMING! PROCLAIM LIBERTY AND JUSTICE THROUGHOUT THE LAND! JUSTICE IS COMING!

The victims experienced the loss of the Constitution first. But no one would listen. Everyone who hears the wide spread stories of the death of the Constitution know the feeling, but are unsure of how it could have happened.

How can so many people ignore the loss of constitutionally protected rights and liberties. How can the government lawfully fail to investigate. How does this deliberate and intentional neglect to recognize the loss of rights HAPPEN IN AMERICA?

It was necessary to find the answer, the cause, the reason. Everyone felt their neglectful actions were lawful. There was that, and ONE OTHE THING which they ALL had in common.

RULE 1.6. Caused it… and kept it secret. MANDATED THE SECRECY. PREVENTING ANY RESOLUTION.

RULE 1.6 Confidentiality of Information punished any who dared make any attempt to expose the sedition caused by this law. This law illegally enacted by the judiciary which prevented prosecution of judicial misconduct – judicial crime – judicial retaliation.

The author of the RULE, the American Bar Association, became the largest and most corrupt racketeering organization in the history of the United States. And their lawyers are preventing the media from carrying this story.

They took our homes. They took our children. They took our families. They took our friends. They took our liberty.

… with Liberty and Justice for all. JUSTICE IS COMING!

Notify your representatives, your senators, your governor, your federal officials… tell them about the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules Of Professional Conduct. (YES, THE SAME EXACT NAME IN EVERY STATE. REALLY.) Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional, destructive, and unjust. Americans demand the restoration of your civil rights and liberties!

JUSTICE IS COMING! PROCLAIM LIBERTY AND JUSTICE THROUGHOUT THE LAND! JUSTICE IS COMING!

For reading, posting or reposting.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. With a cause for relief and standing to address the issue, filed and served every state – lawfully acting to expose a law which obstructed justice and mandated corruption leaving Americans without basic rights and liberties. https://www.facebook.com/groups/ChallengeRule1.6/

RULE 1.6. No Governor. No Legislature. NO KIDDING. No Law. Enacted in EVERY US STATE. Causing the denial of Constitutional rights and liberties. http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/CCF08082013_0000.pdf

They’ve got men everywhere waiting to put me down. I know how this usually plays out. I’m not like the other guys. It matters who I am. Inside. I am a good person. If I am strong. They took my life, my job, my house, my children, my family. They think this is killing me. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 www.facebook.com/groups/ChallengeRule1.6/

“The longer you deprive people of something — certainly a constitutional right — the more anxious they’re going to be to exercise that right,” JB Van Hollen said.

In 1987 the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania enacted a law which denied people of their constitutionally protected rights and liberties… caused extreme injustice and prevented any measure to address judicial corruption, malice and retaliation… NO ONE QUESTIONED IT. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was filed on August 8, 2013

The needle in the legal haystack. The SOLUTION has been found to restore the Constitution, judicial integrity and restore civil rights. Lawfully – but denied any media attention. Filed 8-8-2013 in Philadelphia. http://work2bdone.com/live/2013/10/the-constitutional-challenge-of-rule-1-6-status-update/

“The longer you deprive people of something — certainly a constitutional right — the more anxious they’re going to be to exercise that right,” JB Van Hollen said. http://ChallengeRule16.blogspot.com

“The longer you deprive people of something — certainly a constitutional right — the more anxious they’re going to be to exercise that right,” JB Van Hollen said. http://work2bdone.com/live/2013/10/the-constitutional-challenge-of-rule-1-6-status-update/

I discovered the hacks to my computer. AGAIN. I’ve resigned to the fact that the best I can accomplish alone is to maintain some functionality with the knowledge that the capabilities which can be used to prevent the story being presented by the media, or to other victims , is much stronger and better staffed than one man in the burbs of Philadelphia.

The fake phone calls and messages from people pretending to need help. They always reveal themselves. I try to give them the benefit of the doubt, but they always reveal themselves.

The auto-attendant fake phone calls… which steal your time. Force you to use their automatic system and waste your time pressing buttons only to never get thru. And an hour later they call again. Time wasted. CONSTANTLY.

The fake bill collectors when I have no bills. WHY CALL EVERY HOUR? Because it interrupts. It interrupts constantly.

The hosting company cron job which runs without reason, or explanation. THEY REFUSE TO OFFER ANY INFORMATION ABOUT IT. OF TO INVESTIGATE. And their repreated interest in opening a specific pdf file. Is someone at Host Gator getting married in Montgomery County PA? And using my site to obtain that info instead of going to the Montgomery County web site? Strange behavior… unless you know that code could be hidden in the file and executed remotely via a cron, or to set up the next cron. Could that be what is blocking this site from so many people?

If I was not on the right path, they wouldn’t persist in their tactics and their attacks. It has been a productive week… major developments, and more in the pipeline. The retaliatory actions always increase at these times. Recall, I have been at this since 2007… the patterns are clear.

If I was not destined for success they would put this story on the news. Instead some girl who loses her wedding ring gets 24 hour coverage for 3 days. Seriously.

When the Governor, the Attorney General, and the Legislature is made of of members who are BOUND TO UPHOLD THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION… it is clear who the largest racketeering organization in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is… and evidently the entire country.

Perhaps it is time for me to escalate and ask why the FBI has not investigated the ABA’s sedition and overthrow of every stste government?

The situation they created could only lawfully be addressed by someone who was not a lawyer finding the needle in the haystack after enduring enough terror to expose their terroristic actions, and to have survived their terror. And having to bring the terror to them each time begging for relief… only to receive further injustice.

FBI… How many Americans will die from this domestic form of judicial and litigious terror.

“The longer you deprive people of something — certainly a constitutional right — the more anxious they’re going to be to exercise that right,” Van Hollen said.

Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/jb-van-hollen-wont-seek-third-term-as-attorney-general-b99114726z1-226746901.html#ixzz2h4YjJdUF

https://www.facebook.com/groups/ChallengeRule1.6/

Alternate Web: http://challengerule16.blogspot.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ChallengeRule1.6/

The secret is out. An organization which stayed in the shadows… hiding the TRUTH. Now, we know.