A Terroristic Divorce

November 19, 2013

Gary Kline, Director
Domestic Relations Section
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311

Dear Mr. Kline,

In response to your letter of November 13, 2013, the Order of the Court to which you refer is a void order issued where the court lacked jurisdiction. The order is a nullity.

The evidence of the defect and lack of jurisdiction is on the court record and listed in the court docket for the matter. Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio lacked jurisdiction and authority to issue the Order of May 9, 2011.

Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, it’s judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no jurisdiction; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.”
[Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)]

The Domestic Relations Office by executing and continuing to execute a void order where informed that you are acting on a void order while refusing and denying the opportunity to address the defective order issued without jurisdiction is a violation of your responsibility, a violation of the law, and a violation of my rights.

Your reply also failed to address the behavior of your staff which demonstrates a complicity to deny justice and deliberately deny access and communication with the Domestic Relations Office. It was clearly not the first time a false allegation was used to remove a litigant from the office without recourse. I remind you I was attempting to simply deliver a letter to your office which your clerk refused.

Tampering with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here involves far more than an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up to protect and safeguard the public, institutions in which fraud cannot complacently be tolerated consistently with the good order of society.

The public welfare demands that the agencies of public justice not be so impotent that they must always be the mute and helpless victims of deception and fraud. Surely it cannot be that preservation of the integrity of the judicial process must always wait on the diligence of litigants and demand excessive perseverance.

Take immediate action to review my letter of November 7, 2013. Review the data presented, the court record and issue a decision, or arrange a conference where the information may be presented formally to your office to arrive at a decision.

Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. The corrupt actions have left me homeless and destitute since 2011. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Terance Healy
c/o 871 Mustang Road
Warrington, PA 18976

READ IT. The Gettysburg Address is only three paragraphs. It takes less than a few minutes to read. Give it a read.

---

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Abraham Lincoln
November 19, 1863

KIDS FOR CASH is a riveting look behind the notorious judicial scandal that rocked the nation. Beyond the millions paid and high stakes corruption, KIDS FOR CASH exposes a shocking American secret. In the wake of the shootings at Columbine, a small town celebrates a charismatic judge who is hell-bent on keeping kids in line… until one parent dares to question the motives behind his brand of justice.

---

Kids for cash scandal (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

Luzerne County Courthouse in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

The “kids for cash” scandal unfolded in 2008 over judicial kickbacks at the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. Two judges, President Judge Mark Ciavarella and Senior Judge Michael Conahan, were accused of accepting money from Robert Mericle, builder of two private, for-profit juvenile facilities, in return for contracting with the facilities and imposing harsh sentences on juveniles brought before their courts to increase the number of inmates in the detention centers.

For example, Ciavarella sentenced children to extended stays in juvenile detention for offenses as minimal as mocking a principal on Myspace, trespassing in a vacant building, and shoplifting DVDs from Wal-mart. Ciavarella and Conahan pled guilty on February 13, 2009, pursuant to a plea agreement, to federal charges of honest services fraud and conspiracy to defraud the United States (failing to report income to the Internal Revenue Service, known as tax evasion) in connection with receiving $2.6 million in payments from managers at PA Child Care in Pittston Township and its sister company Western PA Child Care in Butler County. The plea agreement was later voided by a federal judge, who was dissatisfied with the post-plea conduct of the defendants, and the two judges charged subsequently withdrew their guilty pleas, raising the possibility of a criminal trial.

A federal grand jury in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania returned a 48 count indictment against Ciavarella and Conahan including racketeering, fraud, money laundering, extortion, bribery and federal tax violations on September 9, 2009. Conahan entered a revised guilty plea to one count of racketeering conspiracy in July 2010. In a verdict reached at the conclusion of a jury trial, Ciavarella was convicted February 18, 2011 on 12 of the 39 counts he faced.

Following the original plea agreement, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered an investigation of the cases handled by the judges and following its outcome overturned several hundred convictions of youths in Luzerne County. The Juvenile Law Center filed a class action lawsuit against the judges and numerous other parties, and the state legislature created a commission to investigate the wide-ranging juvenile justice problems in the county.

---

So the question which is never asked is WHY DID IT TAKE SO LONG FOR SOMEONE TO REACT TO THE VOLUMINOUS REPORTS ABOUT THE CORRUPT JUDGES? The Judicial Conduct Board ignored EVERY complaint and usurped all responsibility to address the judicial crimes. THEY THEN DID NOTHING while the people were terrorized..

THE ANSWER: The law indicates it is not lawful to prosecute a corrupt judge. Not by a lawyer, prosecutor, district attorney or attorney general. Those who must follow Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

The same rule exists in every state. Same name. Same number. Same dead end for the victims of injustice.

---

DELIBERATE OBSTRUCTION OF REMEDIES FOR THE INJUSTICE

The bigger question is WHY DID THE SHERIFFs who are by constitution and law the Chief Law Enforcement Officers in each County lose their power? It seems that judges and lawyers somehow reduced the Sheriffs responsibilities to prisoner taxi service, foreclosure sales and protection of the judges. Protecting the corrupt as well as the lawful.

The County Sheriff is not required to follow the Rules of Professional Conduct. The Sheriffs could have acted. The Sheriffs could act. The Sheriffs have a responsibility to act. Yet, somehow the Sheriffs have been convinced by the County District Attorneys that the Sheriff has no power.

The Constitutional Challenge, and the sedition it exposed, demonstrates why all of the law enforcement power was not placed under the one branch of government.

In order for the American Bar Association to conceal their sedition of every state government, and their continued protection of corrupt and criminal judges, it was necessary to disenfranchise the Sheriffs from law enforcement. AND THEY DID.

---

This is not an issue of judicial immunity which can be viewed as occasionally unfair. The issue is deliberate unlawful actions by judges who refuse to address their errors, and the judges who are bound by law to ignore their corruption. Judges who must sacrifice their integrity to conceal the lack of integrity of the corrupt.

Judicial immunity protects judges from prosecution from unintentional errors in judgment. Immunity is a necessity for the courts to function. Judges are permitted to make bad decisions – as long as a judge follows the process and the law, the judge has jurisdiction to act.

When a judge fails to follow the process, the judge does not have jurisdiction to act as The Court. When a judge acts without jurisdiction, they are acting without the protection of judicial immunity. This is why they get multiple opportunities to fix their errors. Reconsideration, appeals, etc… Judge’s maintain their immunity even when they just don’t want to believe the testimony. So, if the judge doesn’t like you, YES THE JUDGE CAN RULE AGAINST YOU… as long as the proper process was followed for a hearing. A HUGE part of the job of being a judge is making certain that the judge has jurisdiction in the matter, otherwise the judge has no authority to order anyone to do anything.

When the court lacks jurisdiction… their actions, when documented and presented to the court, present the case for criminal prosecution against the judge. Any deliberate actions to destroy a litigant in the court subsequent to reports of judicial misconduct and crime are retaliatory and bring disgrace upon the entire judiciary. All the judge must do is follow the process, and then they have immunity for their malice.

For example:
1. When Judge Rhonda Daniele concealed her order in my family court matter for 3 years while it was used to leverage every proceeding against me.
No Hearing. No Jurisdiction. Not Valid.

2. When Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio issued a deliberately defective and void order as a divorce decree. When raised to her immediate attention that she lacked jurisdiction to issue the order, she ignored it and issued another order compounding the error. When presented to the court, she again ignored the defect. When appealed to the Superior Court, she acknowledged the Appeal ordering a list of the errors involved in her order. She then prevented the appeal from being transmitted to the Superior Court.
No process. No Jurisdiction. Not valid.

3. When Judge Richard Haas was asked to conduct a penalty for a contempt that did not occur, he was set up to not have jurisdiction in that, AS WELL AS the penalty being part of a void order based on a void order based on a void order based on a defective order. Judge Haas never scheduled the hearing.
The only way to save the judge’s integrity was to do nothing.

4. When Judge Garrett Page conducted that hearing with the knowledge that jurisdication for the matter was with the Superior Court which was awaiting the Appeal paperwork, Judge Page ignored the pending Appeal. Judge Page ignored the nested void orders. Judge Page ignored the defective orders and the evidence on the court record and documented in testimony in his courtroom. Judge Page issued a contempt penalty without a finding of contempt. That penalty was over $300,000.00. This was done with deliberate intent. When a person fails to pay a contempt fine, they can be incarcerated until the amount is satisfied. Contempt penalties are unlike other monetary judgements.
No law. No process. No Jurisdication. Not valid.

5. When the Superior Court of Pennsylvania went to hear the appeal on Judge Page’s absurd order, Montgomery County did not send the exhibits or the documents for the matter.
No law. No process. No power to compel the Lower Court. Not valid.

6. Judge Garrett Page contacts Court Reporters to prevent transcripts from being produced and delivered. Judge Page cancelled the permission granted to proceed In FORMA PAUPERIS. All done without hearings, without explanations, without any regard for justice. All done to conceal the criminal actions of the 17 judges before him on the matter.. as the clear criminal actions by Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio effectively voided all judicial immunity.
No Law. No process. Not valid.

7. When Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio sent the sheriff to execute her void and defective order, the judge was expanding the liability for her criminal action to include the Sheriff’s department.
Actions by other parties based on void orders are subject to prosecution.

Those following a judge’s orders are responsible for making certain the orders are proper. THAT SIMPLY DOESN’T HAPPEN. No on ever confirms the jurisdiction or authority of a judge. Even when presented with the errors and defects, they ignore and act. It’s not a courtesy to ignore a judge’s corruption. It’s becomes a conspiracy.

There is a considerable amount of intimidation involved when it comes to concealing judicial corruption. Even the Montgomery County Employee Ethics rules immorally and unethically require silence. It is unlawful to be a whistleblower in Montgomery County.

For these reasons many counties have begun electing and appointing lawyers to the row officer and county management positions. Clerk of Courts, Controller, Coroner, District Attorney, Jury Commissioners, Prothonotary, Recorder of Deeds, Register of Wills, Sheriff, Treasurer, Court Administration, Domestic Relations. Where a Row officer is a lawyer, they must follow Rule 1.6 and must take no action to expose the corruption and crimes of the court.

---

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct demonstrate the loss of civil rights and liberties. That was the primary issue. It was the information from Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane which exposed the law improperly enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Their own act of judicial misconduct was immediately impossible to lawfully address – as they would expose their misconduct if they took action.

The conspiracy involved to get away with denying peoples rights has been very elaborate. Right in front of a distracted American Public, the American Bar Association – the lawyers and the judges – executed a plan which resulted in the loss of rights for American Citizens. They wrote themselves into a corner they could not lawfully escape.

1. Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional.

2. A Sheriff is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the County, NOT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY. The reason for that is very clear. The reason everyone was convinced otherwise shows the extent of the conspiracy to avoid prosecution.

After Operation Graylord, the best way to protect the judiciary from losing their integrity was to have a judiciary with integrity… NOT to make it impossible to prosecute the corrupt judges. That is plain stupid and wrong on every level.

When you remove Rule 1.6 all of the other laws and aspects of immunities work. It’s how the system was designed.

Judges who commit crimes by not following due process, court procedures and the Law, are deliberately acting without jurisdiction and MUST be prosecuted.

The American Bar Association is the biggest and most corrupt racketeering organization ever to exist in the US. Their sedition and treason must be addressed. They deliberately destroyed the integrity of the judiciary nationwide. There is no excusing their crime.

The law is for the protection of the people…

When a corrupt judge issues a corrupt and defective order (AND DOES SO WITH DELIBERATE INTENT TO ISSUE A VOID ORDER), it causes lawlessness and terror which cannot be addressed. NO ONE WILL ADDRESS THE CORRUPT JUDGE’s CRIME AND INJUSTICE. Your life becomes daily terror, additional injustice and constant frustration – 24 HOURS A DAY.

Any and all lies and fraud are ignored, because if you attempt to assert your rights or the truth, the corrupt judge will be exposed. It doesn’t matter how many people become involved in the crimes against you. You have little recourse but to suffer continuing criminal acts against you.

All anyone has to do is connect the void and defective order of the corrupt judge to their actions and you get hurt. There is no escape until they kill you.

Healy v Miller is a case where I am attempting to recover my home and property. By law, the home and property is mine. By deed, the home and property is mine. Miller invalidly asserts 3 words on one page of a defective order against the facts. For the last 2 years, Law enforcement will not prosecute the theft of my home, or the theft of the Miller’s money.

Until I succeed, I remain homeless and destitute. That was the intent of the 18 judges involved in my divorce. I received my injustice (and death sentence) when Judge Rhonda Daniele issued a secret order in my divorce. The order was hidden for 3 years and destroyed my life, my relationships with everyone, my reputation, caused problems with law enforcement and denied me my children. No hearing. I’ve never seen Judge Rhonda Daniele. Judge Rhonda Daniele was never assigned to my case, yet her corrupt order was the impetus to injustice and denial of civil human and parental rights since 2007. Through 17 other judges who sacrificed their integrity to conceal her crime – terrorizing my life in the process.

When the secret order was found and presented in court, the retaliation from the court became worse. The corruption and and retaliation escalated taking everything from me. It has been two years since that defective and void order was issued. It was issued defective and void intentionally so that no one would ever address the evil that Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio was executing. They return to attack constantly. I cannot get hearings, but everyone else does. The hearing then delivers another injustice. In March 2013, Judge Garrett page ordered me to pay over $300,000 for a penalty of contempt BUT without a finding of contempt. A contempt order will put a person in jail until it is satisfied. Their goal was Jail. It lead to the proof necessary to demonstrate complete loss of rights when the matter made it to the superior Court. It lead to the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6. It proved the corruption was based on the Rule. And the Rule proved to be so much more evil by design and intent.

I present the facts in court and when the judge realizes the corruption of the court, the judge perpetrates further terror. Eighteen judges have terrorized me since 2007.

CASE DOCUMENTS
Civil Complaint – Action in Ejectment ( PDF )

Emergency Praecipe for Immediate Eviction / Order of Possession( PDF )

Emergency Praecipe for Immediate Eviction/Order of Possession (Addendum)( PDF )

Defendant’s Preliminary Objections and Defendant’s Memorandum of Law ( PDF )

Plaintiff Responds to Defendant’s Preliminary Objections and Defendant’s Memorandum of Law
( PDF )

Dear Mr Healy:

I received your packet of information and letter dated November 7th, 2013. The most recent Order of Court we have is the order dated May 9th, 2011 entered by the Honorable Carolyn Carluccio. APL terminates when the Divorce is Ordered. There are no additional Orders with regard to support that would permit reinstatement at this time.

Sincerely,
Gary Kline

A typical non-responsive letter to the questions asked, while entirely indicative of the reason for their harassment.

So the apparent answer to everything that is wrong is Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio. A defective and void order by a corrupt judge causes the denial of EVERYTHING. And for some reason is the answer to everything. And the reason for no hearings meeting or correspondence. It prevents a letter from being delivered and filed.

The defective and void order which was designed to destroy every ASPECT OF MY LIFE. because without that destructive order, the prior judges corruption would be exposed and prosecuted. Carolyn Carluccio’s corrupt actions would void judicial immunity. The deliberate actions of a judge to destroy a person.

THE DEFECTIVE AND VOID ORDER YOU REFER TO HAS BEEN UNDER APPEAL SINCE 2011. BOTH PARTIES HAVE SWORN TO IT BEING INVALID. STOP ENABLING THE TERROR OF CAROLYN CARLUCCIO.

Operation Greylord was an investigation conducted jointly by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the IRS Criminal Investigation Division, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the Chicago Police Internal Affairs Division and the Illinois State Police into corruption in the judiciary of Cook County, Illinois (the Chicago jurisdiction).

A total of 92 people were indicted, including 17 judges, 48 lawyers, ten deputy sheriffs, eight policemen, eight court officials, and a state legislator.

Operation Greylord lead to many other similar investigations targeting corruption in Cook County including Operation Silver Shovel, Incubator, Lantern, Operation Gambat, and Safebet.

The key undercover FBI agents and lawyers were David Grossman, David Reis and Terrence Hake. Hake was a Cook County prosecutor, who complained about the bribery and corruption in the Murder and Sexual Assault preliminary hearing courtroom in Chicago.

The Bar Association and the Judiciary were determined that something like this would never happen again. It was then that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information became LAW in each state preventing injustice and judicial corruption from being reported to authorities by attorneys and judges.

Preventing District Attorneys from prosecuting corruption and other crimes which would expose the corruption.

Preventing Attorneys General from prosecuting corruption and other crimes which would expose the corruption.

Each judge forced to sacrifice their integrity to conceal the lack of integrity of other members of the judiciary.

The moment the Supreme Court in each state illegally enacted the LAW, it became ILLEGAL for them to remove it. It would expose their violation – the Supreme Court does not enact law. The legislature and the Governor enact law. BUT, The Supreme Court of the State would be violating the law if they exposed it as unconstitutional, unlawful, or improperly enacted.

Rule 1.6 has destroyed too many people, and families.

Rule 1.6 has no purpose or reason other than to conceal injustice, prevent truth and permit corruption.

Rule 1.6 is a nullity. Not a Law, as it is unconstitutional. For that reason every judge and attorney who has heard of the Constitutional Challenge has an obligation to stand up and defend the US Constitution and restore the rights of the People of the United States.

Read the FBI report on Operation Greylord…. The roundup of prosecuted corrupt court and law enforcement personnel in Greylord is considerably smaller than those who participated in the Terroristic Divorce.

There is ONLY one person who is an attorney who is permitted to address Rule 1.6 and expose it. The US Attorney General Eric Holder. Federal law dictates that NO LAW may be written which prevents the US Attorney General from action.

Other lawyers could lawfully address it, BUT they would be taking the risk that the disciplinary actions would occur before they were able to present the unconstitutionality, the criminality and the mandatory corruption enabled by Rule 1.6.

Resurrect Justice.

( PDF )

IN THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA

Terance Healy	:
	: #2013-29976
v.	:
	:
David R. Miller	:
Jennifer K. Miller	:

PLAINTIFF RESPONDS TO DEFENDANTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
And
DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OF LAW

1. Defendants, David R. Miller and Jennifer K. Miller, represented by Philip A. Magen and Scott E. Goldstein, have failed to produce a valid deed or title demonstrating to this Honorable Court a valid claim to the property and residence.

2. Defendants allege the existence of a power of attorney, but have failed to produce a valid power of attorney instrument.

3. Defendants have introduced, as Exhibit 2, a defective and void divorce decree suggesting the Court ignore where (1) the Court lacked jurisdiction to issue any such order; (2) ignore the defectiveness of the order; (3) ignore the lack of the order being a power of attorney in any legal form; (4) ignore the law which makes any power of attorney a nullity within a divorce decree; (5) ignore that every agent acting in the transaction was aware of the inadequacy of the document as authorization.

NO POWER OF ATTORNEY

4. Terance Healy has never granted a Power of Attorney at any person at any time.

5. There is no record of any such Power of Attorney relating to Terance Healy being recorded with the Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds.

6. There is no record of any such Power of Attorney relating to Terance Healy being recorded in the Montgomery County Court Docket.

7. There is no record of any such Power of Attorney being produced or provided to the parties involved in the fraudulent conveyance.

8. On August 8, 2011, Jodi Marlow of Genuine Title indicated to Christina Grucella, Keller Williams Real Estate; Patricia Tagliolini, Coldwell Banker Real Estate; and Alex Mikhelson of Genuine Title that the contract “is not signed properly by the sellers”, and that “we need Mr Healy to sign the sales contract or we need a copy of the Power of Attorney.” [ Exhibit A ]

9. On August 9, 2011, Jodi Marlow of Genuine Title has attempted “to explain to the realtor that even though it states the wife can be a POA to sell the property that we will still need an original POA signed by the husband and notarized.” [ Exhibit B ]

10. On August 9, 2011, BJ Bratzel, an underwriter at Fidelity National Agency Solutions writes “if the husband will cooperate, getting a POA out of him would certainly make it cleaner and easier.” [ Exhibit B ] Terance Healy was not aware of the activity, nor was he a party to the fraudulent conveyance of his home.

11. BJ Bratzel indicates the necessity to ‘Record a certified copy of it’. There is no recorded copy of any additional document with the deed. [ Exhibit B ]

12. In an email on September 7, 2011, Cheryl Hertsch of Genuine Title indicates to Ann Markley of SOS that she has ‘the original document that is to be recorded appointing her [Sonya Healy] to sign on behalf of Terance’. [ Exhibit C ] There is no such document recorded.

13. There is no Power of Attorney instrument filed as a part of any documents with the Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

14. Pennsylvania Law Chapter 56 Sections 5601 through 5611 inclusive govern all powers of attorney.

15. The defective and void divorce order does not follow the General Provisions 56012 with regard to execution, notice and acknowledgement.

16. The defective and void divorce order does not follow the Form of power of attorney 5602 with regard to specification of powers, appointment and filing of the instrument.

17. The defective and void divorce order was not properly implemented with regard to 5603 Implementation of power of attorney.

18. The defective and void divorce order was not handled in accordance with 5604 Durable powers of attorney as it was improperly misrepresented and used to deny Plaintiff from any and all information regarding the property conveyance transaction.

19. The defective and void divorce order could not have been used as a power of attorney as 5605(c) indicates power of attorney is revoked after either principal files an action in divorce.

20. As such, pursuant to Pennsylvania Law the defective and void divorce order presented by Defendants in support of their claim could not be a valid power of attorney instrument.

DEFECTIVE AND VOID DIVORCE DECREE

21. A defective and void defective Divorce Decree was entered in the divorce matter on May 11, 2011. It is a nullity.

22. An Order for Equitable Distribution may only be entered with a valid Divorce Decree, as such the Order of May 9, 2011 is void in its entirety. It is a nullity.

PENDING APPEAL

23. A Notice of Appeal was filed timely on August 15, 2011 and acknowledged by Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio in her Order of August 22, 2013. [ Exhibit D ]

24. A Concise Statement of Errors Complained of On Appeal was filed on September 15, 2011.

EFFORTS TO AVOID THE FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE

25. All information regarding the sale and fraudulent conveyance of the home was prevented from the Plaintiff.

26. The filing of the Notice of Appeal in the matter lawfully served as a superceadas to the execution of any actions by either party.

27. A Title Search Document from TitlePrep (Global Data Source) Title Processing Services on July 25, 2011 accurately indicates NO FINAL DECREE ENTERED AS OF THIS COVER DATE. [ Exhibit E ]

28. Multiple phone calls to Christine Grucella and the Keller Williams office were not returned. I was forwarded by their receptionist to their attorney who inexplicably refused to provide information.

29. Plaintiff met with Christine Grucella in person at the residence where she indicated she had no information regarding the sale of the home. Christine Grucella lives a few doors away from the property.

30. Letters to Christine Grucella and the management at Keller Williams on August 29, 2011 informed them of the Appeal in process and the acknowledgement of the Appeal by the Court. [ Exhibit F ]

31. A Petition requesting the documents executed by Sonya Healy relating to the Sale was filed with the Court on September 1, 2011.

32. On September 1, 2011, an Injunction Blocking the Sale of the Home was filed with the Court.

33. On September 6, 2011, upon request by Valerie Angst of Angst & Angst, all hearings previously scheduled for Septemeber 20, 2011 were immediately continued to Friday September 23, 2011 by Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio.

34. The fraudulent conveyance of the property took place on September 20, 2011.

35. On September 23, 2011, in Court at the commencement of the proceeding Plaintiff Terance Healy was informed of the fraudulent conveyance of his home and property on September 20, 2011.

36. On September 23, 2011, Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio threatened Terance Healy with contempt and jail if he did not immediately endorse over to Sonya Healy all of the checks from the closing.

37. Pursuant to a verbal Order by Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio all of the Plaintiffs personal possessions – everything of his that was in his house – were disposed of on the closing date which the he had been prevented from learning.
– Prevented by Sonya Healy
– Prevented by Valerie Angst of Angst & Angst
– Prevented by Robert Angst of Angst & Angst
– Prevented by Christine Grucella of Keller Williams
– Prevented by Jason Drissel at Keller Williams
– Prevented by Bruce Neumann, attorney for Keller Williams
– Prevented by Court Administration
– Prevented by Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio

OBSTRUCTION

38. After receiving the Concise Statement of Issue Complained of on Appeal, the Appeal filed on August 15, 2011 was obstructed and prevented from being transmitted to the Superior Court by the Montgomery County Prothonotary at the direction of Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio.

DENIAL OF RIGHTS

It has been the Plaintiff’s divorce experience which has caused him to find himself in the unique position to act lawfully with proper standing while having a valid cause for relief in the proper forum to Challenge the Constitutionality of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on August 8, 2013 – Civil Action 13-4614.

Filed by the Plaintiff on behalf of the entire country to address the loss of constitutionally protected civil rights and liberties; restore the integrity of the judiciary and the legal profession; and deliver to the legislature the ability to perform the duties of their office.

In the response to the challenge, Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane indicated that the Law being challenged was improperly enacted, not written by the legislature, nor signed by a Governor. The same law has been unlawfully enacted in every State.

The author of the Law is the American Bar Association.

During 2011, Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio was the President of the Montgomery County Bar Association.

FAILURE TO DEMONSTRATE OWNERSHIP

39. The deed mentioned in the Defendants objections is incomplete and improperly filed with the Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds.

40. The suggested Decree and Order dated May 9, 2011 is defective, void and a nullity.

41. The suggested Decree and Order dated May 9, 2011 is not a Power of Attorney instrument.

42. The suggested Decree and Order dated May 9, 2011 cannot grant power of attorney to a divorcing spouse. A divorce decree invalidates a power of attorney one spouse may have for the other.

FRAUD AND FORGERY

43. The closing documents demonstrate the fraud alleged in the Plaintiff’s complaint.

44. Sonya Healy misrepresented several pages of a defective and void divorce decree and equitable distribution order as or some sort of power of attorney.

BAD POWER OF ATTORNEY

45. Sonya Healy did not have any authorization, power of attorney or valid court order to sign any documents for the Plaintiff.

MISREPRESENTATION OF MARITAL STATUS

46. Sonya Healy signed a Continuous Marriage Affidavit document at the closing indicating that she was legally married. [ Exhibit G ]

47. Sonya Healy used a defective and void divorce order to misrepresent her having a power of attorney.

48. Sonya Healy is correct that she is legally married. In swearing to that statement she acknowledges the defective and void divorce decree. Further evidence that she did NOT AT ANY TIME have a power of attorney or authorization which would have allowed her to sign for the Plaintiff.

49. The Court may excuse a party for actions tasken unknowingly when a divorce decree is questioned as long as their actions indicate a consistent belief of either being divorced or married.

50. Sonya Healy swears she is married during the transaction where she purports to have a power of attorney based on a dicvoce decree. Her actioons are inexcusable and deliberate and made with the intent to commit fraud.

SUBPEONAS FOR INFORMATION

51. Plaintiff has served participants in the fraudulent conveyance with subpoenas for documents. Those documents will be organized, prepared and filed with this court.

52. Documents received from Genuine Title indicate “speak to our corp counsel” and “don;t give any info unless supeana”. [ Exhibit H ]

53. Jay Zuckerberg, President of Genuine Title responded to requests for information by emailing “Sir, you will need to go through the courts as we went off the courts instructions as well.” There were NO COURT INSTRUICTIONS in thwe documents provided after Genuine Title was served with a subpeona.

MEMORANDUM FORMAT.

54. Where the represented parties in this case have submitted identical documents to this Honorable Court, one numbered and titled as “Preliminary Objections” and the other unnumbered and titled as a “Memorandum of Law”, the pro se Plaintiff respectfully begs the Courts direction if this is an expectation or a necessary requirement to duplicate pleadings before this Court.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable Court restore the Plaintiff’s property to the true and rightful owner by issuing an Order for Ejectment to the Defendants to immediately vacate the property and residence.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy

---

CASE DOCUMENTS
Civil Complaint – Action in Ejectment ( PDF )

Emergency Praecipe for Immediate Eviction / Order of Possession( PDF )

Emergency Praecipe for Immediate Eviction/Order of Possession (Addendum)( PDF )

Defendant’s Preliminary Objections and Defendant’s Memorandum of Law ( PDF )

Plaintiff Responds to Defendant’s Preliminary Objections and Defendant’s Memorandum of Law
( PDF )

Sheriff Eileen Behr
Montgomery County
Norristown, PA 19404

Sheriff Behr,

Please accept and review the attached letter to Gary Kline about an experience at the Domestic Relations Office on November 7, 2013. County Deputies continue to act on false information from Court personnel.

This issue in the DRO was addressed with Corporal Kohl yesterday. This circumstance was pointed out to he and Corporal Haas years ago. your deputies have recognized that it is the County Personnel who are acting to deny access to the court, to harass, deter and prevent information from being available. The County Personnel are misinforming and using your staff to hinder, undermine and threaten my efforts and my freedom.

I take my freedom and my liberty seriously. The survival of my experience since 2007 in the Courthouse has documented and exposed the criminal sedition of the Pennsylvania Government by judges and lawyers who are unable to address or correct their damage. I have raised the matter in the Federal Courts for myself and on behalf of those who have not survived, baited into jail, forced into homelessness, drugs, isolation and suicide.

The criminal fraudulent conveyance of my home has been documented and proven, yet there has been no action. i remain homeless. Denied access to the District Court by Court Administration. prevented from hearings by Court Administration. Why am I still homeless while the crime is ignored and my home is occupied by people without a valid title to the property. if someone stole a car or a wallet, THAT would have been returned and the crime addressed.

The criminal fraud provided to domestic Relations Office is being ignored. In the past they have denied my rights falsely indicating paperwork was not properly provided to them and served. Their own records demonstrate the files have been deleted. My file is marked CONFIDENTIAL and not available for review.

I remain homeless and destitute and continue to be terrorized and threatened by the harassment and intrusions into my life. I again request your intervention and support. Thank you as always for the professionalism of your deputies.

Sincerely

Terance Healy

Joseph P. Walsh
Jeffrey W. McDonnell
Robert J. Birch
Candyce Fleuhr Chimera
Michael J. Fox

My home at 110 Banbury Avenue was fraudulently conveyed on September 20, 2013. Usingf an invalid, defective and void court order, along with misinformation and false testimony the transaction took place without my being informed.

Police have refused to take a complaint ion the matter.

Judge Andrea Duffy was prevented from hearing the complaint by her court administrator.

Judge Patricia Coonahan has the matter in her court, however court administration has failed to schedule any hearing.

The fraudulent conveyance is clear. Based on fraud, forgery, bad power of attorney, misrepresentation of marital status, undue influence, mistakes in recording legal documents, falsified title records, and representations on legal documenta which are invalid or incorrect.

The fraud has been confirmed by Nancy Becker, Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds.

The fraud has been reported to Montgomery Township Police.

The fraud has been reported to Montgomery County Sheriff Eileen Behr.

I have been homeless since these malicious actions regarding my home commenced in June 2011.

Montgomery township police have threatened ME with arrest based on a false report after current occupants were served with the Civil Action in Ejectment. This is inexplicable. If someone stole a car it would be returned to the owner. This is my home which has been stolen.

What I have discovered is that I lost my civil rights when an act of judicial misconduct occurred in 2007. There is no lawful way to address the judicial misconduct, as any lawyer, district attorney or attorney general must follow Rule 1.6 of the rules of Professional Conduct which prohibit lawyers from taking actions which might implicate a member of the judiciary in a crime.

This is why Cash for Kids in Luzerne County went on for years. As over 5000 children and families were affected by the criminal corruption of a judge. No one copuld stop him. No one could explain their inaction to the requests of the victims.

This is why the foreclosure crisis has resulted in millions of people being removed from their homes because a fraudulent deed presented in court was the misconduct necessary to effectively result in the loss of civil rights and liberties – as the misconduct could not be addressed in court or publicly.

I have filed in the Federal Court to address the denial of my rights and liberties protected by the United States Constitution and restope the rights not only for myself but for all Americans. A copy of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of information of the Rules of Professional Conduct is attached for your review.

Rule 1.6 was not written by the legislature, nor signed by a Governor. it immediately became impossible to address as it was enacted by an act of judicial misconduct. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court illegally and unlawfully enacted the law on October 16, 1987, effective April 1, 1988. Injustice became impossible to address within the state of Pennsylvania.

The same law, same number, same name has been enacted in EVERY state. This is no coincidence. The author of the law is the same in every state.

I would appreciate your help and support regarding the restoration of the constitutional rights of the people of Montgomery Township.

I would appreciate your help and support in the efforts to obtain my home, and to restore the rights of the people in the township, the state and nationwide.

Sincerely,

Terance Healy

John Malcolm
Heritage Foundation
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Ave, NE
Washington, DC 20002

Dear Mr Malcolm,

You were contacted my Michael Labate and after an introductory discussion it was suggested that we forward the following documents to you for review.

We have discovered that Rule1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct can result in the denial of constitutionally protected rights and liberties. Once this occurs there is no assistance or escape.

I lost my civil rights when an act of judicial misconduct occurred in 2007. It was kept secret for 3 years while undermining court hearings. Once discovered in 2010, the injustice grew. There was no lawful way to address the judicial misconduct, as any lawyer, district attorney or attorney general must follow Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct which prohibits lawyers from taking any action which might implicate a member of the judiciary in a crime.

The Cash for Kids scandal in Luzerne County PA went on for almost a decade until Federal agents intervened. Over 5000 children and families were affected by the criminal corruption of a judge. Putting children in jail for his own gain. No one could stop him. No one could explain their inaction. No one coudl respond to the requests of the victims for help.

This is also why the foreclosure crisis has resulted in millions of people being removed from their homes. A fraudulent deed presented in court was the misconduct necessary to effectively result in the loss of civivl rights and liberties – the misconduct could not be addressed in the court or publicly.

Rule 1.6 was not written by the legislature, nor signed by the Governor. It immediately became impossible to address as it was enacted by an act of judicial miscondduct. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court illegaly and unl;awfully enacted the law on October 16, 1987, efffective April 1, 1988. Injustice became impossible to address within the state of Pennsylvania.

The same law, same number, same name has been encacted in EVERY state. This is no coincidence. The author of the law is the same in every state.

We have filed in Federal Court. Civil Action 13-4614. The matter is currently proceeding for reconsideration by the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and a concurrent Appeal to the Third Circuit is being prepared.

Any support of assistance that you can provide would be appreciated.

Thank You

Terance Healy
Todd Krautheim