It’s their game…

I have an unsigned undocketed forged order issued without jurisdiction.

To appeal you must provide a copy of the docket.  CAN’T.

To appeal you must provide a copy of the order.  CAN’T.

For an Appeal to be accepted, the court must have jurisdiction to hear the appeal.  CAN’T.
(So lawyers in appellate court intercept, Intervene, obstruct and forge. Concealed by Rule 1.6)

To decide, the appellate court must have jurisdiction.  CAN’T.
(So lawyers intercept, Intervene, obstruct and forge.  Concealed by Rule 1.6)

The ABA has affiliated bar associations in every major state and federal jurisdiction.  It’s what they do to conceal their overthrow of the Judicial system in every state and FEDERALLY.

They refer to these ‘orders’ as unappealable.  I call it void and defective fraud upon the court which violates the public trust.  Tomato – potato.

Unable to file a regular NOTICE OF APPEAL, I reported my NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania via Twitter. 
CAN’T?   DID!

Served the Report of the NOTICE OF APPEAL upon the Montgomery County District Attorney via Twitter.
CAN’T?   DID!

In order to indicate that I have incorrectly filed my appeal, they must first indicate that the invalid document is valid.  CAN’T.

They will then be forced to expose that they knowingly and deliberately sent a fraudulent defective and void forged court order by mail with intent to deceive and mislead. WON’T. THIS WILL BE IGNORED because it cannot be resolved when it cannot be addressed without exposing the corruption.

The deliberate fraudulent actions of the DA and COURT ADMINISTRATION which cannot be prosecuted pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality, are clearly criminal lawless and denying my Constitutional rights and DONE IN A MANNER DESIGNED TO PREVENT ANY LAWFUL RESOLUTION.  This can only be described as TERRORISM.

[ Played this one out several times in the last 9 years.  It was a secret order in Aug 07 which started my nightmare.  It was a defective and void divorce decree lacking subject matter jurisdiction which exposes the corruption of 20 judges over 5 years and HUNDREDS OF PETITIONS.  It is that same defective and void ‘divorce decree’ which caused the fraudulent conveyance of my home.  And the inability to address their deliberate corruption which has lead to my letter to the Governor and Legislature which they call a “terroristic threat”.]

I spoke with Robert Graci of the Judicial Conduct Board yesterday.

I had wanted to speak with him for years about how Rule 1.6 Confidentiality rendered the JCB moot when judges commit and conceal acts of injustice.

My last report to JCB was hand delivered on August 1, 2013.  The dismissal of that report arrived on September 4, 2015.  OVER TWO YEARS LATER.

Mr. Graci took my call.  He attempted to suggest that the JCB was busy and he cited the volume of complaints he receives.  Horseshit.

I explained that in the 2 years they were ‘conducting the necessary review’ and ‘careful consideration’, there was no contact for further information, clarification or explanation.

I did not call to argue.  I did explain to him that I understood that the actions of the JCB were lawful.  Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevented the JCB from addressing the injustice of a judge… even where that injustice was the culmination of the injustice by 19 other judges, with one acting to retaliate for their wrongdoing.
I mentioned to him that the same form letter had been used for ALL of the reports I made to JCB.

I explained to him how Rule 1.6 undermined his job, and the courts themselves.

I explained to him that unconstitutional Rule 1.6 caused me to have no protection of the law and causes all Constitutional rights to be ignored.

I mentioned that I had wanted to have a dialog with him about it for the last two years.

I went thru my discovery process, and then cited examples of Rule 1.6 Injustice within Pennsylvania and nationwide.  He disagreed with my findings about Rule 1.6, but was also not interested in learning more.  He also could not provide an explanation for the excuses provided by lawyers to conceal RULE 1.6 injustice.

He listened attentively to explanations and while disagreeing, he also suggested examples which might prove my findings incorrect.  Those examples were promptly addressed and explained.

I explained that I understood he could not be ‘converted’ in the phone call.  The Rules don’t permit that. It was not the point.

The 30+ minute phone call during which he attempted to poke holes in the Rule 1.6 Challenge. 

The only thing he had left was to say was he didn’t agree with me and it was not his responsibility.  He was wrong on that also. 

It is the responsibility of every lawyer to work to the betterment of JUSTICE.  That too is part of the Rules of Professional Conduct.  I explained that Rule 1.6 undermines Constitution, Law, rights, and even all the other Rules of Professional Conduct… and it does it confidentially.

There was the usual citing of Article V.  I asked him if there was a reason that the entire sentence or paragraph was never included in the citation.  The part which is left out is the part about the judiciary only having authority where the substantive rights of litigants are not affected.

He kept trying to suggest the conversation adversarial… suggesting I was trying to set him up.  I told him that was not the case at all.  I then mentioned that there were 20 judges involved in Healy v Healy which was indicative of problems.  It was necessary to review the jurisdiction of the courts, and how the courts only have jurisdiction where they follow the law.  Where a judge issued defective and void orders which are improperly enforced, Rule 1.6 conceals the lawlessness and lack of jurisdiction.  Rule 1.6 even conceals the efforts which undermine the related appeals.

We disagreed on subject matter jurisdiction, however when we talked it through the difference was the perspective on hearing a matter, and issuing a defective and void decree order without any basis in law resulting in a lapse of subject matter jurisdiction.

I told him I had waited years to have the conversation with him.  I mentioned I only filed one report per judge and that I wasn’t interested in wasting anyone’s time. 

I asked his support now that he was aware of the Constitutional issue involved.

I advised him that I would keep him in the loop on my efforts and documents which are being prepared currently.

He said he did not want that.  I told him I would include him anyway.  It would help him to perform his job responsibilities.  It wasn’t my intent to suggest that Rule 1.6 undermined the JCB completely, but clearly the JCB didn’t believe there was any responsibility for the proliferation of injustice and constitutional denials by judges.

We covered just about every aspect of Rule 1.6.

The strange thing is that the judges should have been reporting the affect as well.  THE LAWYERS SHOULD HAVE BEEN REPORTING THE AFFECT AS WELL.

Of course, if they had been reporting it…. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN CONFIDENTIALLY AND HE WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO DISCUSS IT. 

PERHAPS, I WILL GIVE MR. GRACI THE BENEFIT OF THAT DOUBT.  He did seem to comprehend and grasp the information and examples immediately.  He engaged with examples which were immediately addressed into my findings.

My hope for him is that he begins to seek to improve justice … and stop  concealing and ignoring injustice.

The victim has no other recourse but to persevere.

Multiple articles out this week present an illogical scenario seeking the suspension of Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane’s Law License.

WTAE – Ethics Watchdog Says Kane Harms Law Enforcement

Reading Eagle – Pennsylvania Agency Wants Kathleen Kane’s License Suspended

Illogical because the story neglects to explain the ‘secret’ which lawyers and courts cannot discuss.

The Secret:  The Pennsylvania Supreme Court improperly enacted an unconstitutional law which they are unable to suspend and remove because THAT improperly enacted and unconstitutional law requires nondisclosure and confidentiality.

The law was improperly enacted as it affects the substantive rights of litigants and results in the loss of any protection under the Law, and permits the INGORING of a litigants Constitutional rights with no opportunity for recovery or escape from future injustice.

It’s been called ‘the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania’… because the entire government knows the problem, but only one person can start the fix.  Non-lawyer, Governor Tom Wolf.  However, his lawyers in the Office of General Counsel prevent him from becoming fully informed.

The Attorney General has been ordered to be silent to cover up the problem.  That’s not working out so well as far as the cover-up goes.  But, the ABA and lawyers are playing the Confidentiality rules fast and loose to try to bring down one of the most effective Attorney Generals in Pennsylvania history.

THERE IS A BIGGER SECRET: This happened nationally… In every state gradually rolled out from 1984 New Jersey to 2009 Maine. The confidentiality extends to conceal the Denial of the Rule of Law and ignoring Constitutional rights.

Every. Person. Matters.
Except when the lawyers are required to conceal American Injustice. When District Attorneys and Attorneys General are prevented from prosecuting Constitutional infractions because it turns out they have an attorney-client relationship with the offender.

The administration of justice has been undermined. The judiciary have lost their independence – a necessary element for valid jurisdiction.

When Kane recognized the unconstitutionality of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality, she found herself personally ordered to neglect the responsibilities of the 
Office of Attorney General to which she had been elected. Those secret orders from unidentified courts prevent the Attorney General from effective law enforcement and protecting and defending the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Constitution of the United States.

Where Rule 1.6 had been demonstrated as unconstitutional, it was recaste to continue the injustice and unconstitutional actions which are concealed by nondisclosure and confidentiality. The OAG was prevented from any effort to restore the Rule of Law and the US Constitution in several matters before the PA courts.

All lawyers are prevented by the unconstitutional confidentiality law from addressing the improperly enacted law promulgated by the PA Supreme Court. The Supreme Court itself is prevented from any Constitutional review or suspension of it’s own unconstitutional law. The leadership of the Legislature prevents discussion and exposure of the issue in the Senate or Assembly. The lawyers in the Office of General Counsel prevent any meetings with the Governor- who does by law have the authority to call the Legislature to address and suspend the unconstitutional law.

The dance around the unconstitutional confidentiality rules is demonstrated in Cash for Kids, the improper handling of the Sandusky case, the foreclosure crisis nationwide, and the cases where Attorney General Kathleen Kane is being attacked by former employees of the OAG with whom she has an obligation to conceal the wrongdoing of those with whom she has an attorney-client privilege. ACP is one small aspect of the broader unconstitutional Rule 1.6 which is responsible for concealing American Injustice in every state and jurisdiction.

Unconstitutional American Injustice Ignored
#EveryPersonMatters

@RisaFerman @MontcopaDA
Risa Vetri Ferman, Montgomery County District Attorney aggressively conceals it.

@PaAttorneyGen
Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane is obligated to expose it.

@GovernorTomWolf
Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf can act to expose it.

@PaLegislature
The Pennsylvania Legislature leadership prevents efforts to expose it.

@SupremeCtofPA
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania had improperly enacted it.

@PACourts
The Pennsylvania courts are held hostage by it.

@FBI
The Federal Bureau of Investigation pursuant to McDade-Murtha Amendment can’t touch it.

@SCOTUS
The Supreme Court of the United States is shamed by it. Judicial independence is affected by the violation of The Public Trust.

@POTUS
President Barack Obama is powerless to address it.

@ABAesq
The American Bar Association caused it … in EVERY STATE and NATIONALLY. Their Model Rules of Professional Conduct are unethical, immoral, unlawful, unconstitutional, unconscionable, …

@ABAesq
The membership of the ABA profit from it. While affiliated organizations in EVERY major state and federal jurisdiction intercept, interfere and prevent the administration of justice and access to the courts.

American Injustice Ignored by Unconstitutional Corruption pursuant to
Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION

In America…

The denial of constitutional protected rights and the Rule of law cannot be prosecuted where the Attorney General and the District Attorney must maintain Confidentiality for THEIR CLIENTS.

The staff of govt offices and agencies are protected by unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Confidentiality which includes attorney-client privilege.

Federal Law Enforcement and prosecution is similarly prevented because the McDade-Murtha Amendment requires all federal investigators and lawyers to adhere to the Rules of Professional Conduct in the jurisdiction where they are working.

Unconstitutional Rule 1.6 requires Confidentiality and Non-disclosure of the collateral affect of the law which was improperly enacted in EVERY state from1984 to 2009.

ABC Breaking News

Rule 1.6 has been improperly enacted in every state as the mandate of nondisclosure results in law enforcement ignoring the denial of constitutional rights and the Rule of law… With no opportunity to recover… EVER.

REMEMBER WHEN THE SHERIFF WAS THE CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IN EACH COUNTY??? As a non-lawyer, the Sheriff could enforce the Law and The Constitution.

BUT, the lawyers and judges have convinced the Sheriff of a diminished capacity which basically makes the Sheriff Department into UBER FOR PRISONERS… and protectors of a judiciary without independence… held hostage.

The general apathy about PORNgate emails fails to recall recent Pennsylvania History… and another witch hunt which annihilated the reputation of Penn State’s Joe Paterno.

Paterno could never have done anything about Sandusky. His career, reputation and legacy were sacrificed for the sake of public appearance.

The PORNgate emails released last week were part of a collection by those SAME investigators who were S-L-O-W to prosecute Jerry Sandusky. Pervs of a feather?

The Attorney General has an attorney-client relationship with the personnel in the Office of the Attorney General. As such, Kathleen Kane could not reveal the misdeeds, negligence and sabotage of the people in her office… BUT she can fire them. SO SHE DID.

Consider the following…

Who Is The Client of the government attorney? The general consensus is that there are five possible answers to the question:
– Public
– Government as a whole
– Branch of government in which employed
– Particular agency or department
– Responsible officers who make decisions with an agency or department
MORE INFO: WHO IS YOUR CLIENT? ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS

---

Remember when the anticipated Sandusky Report FAILED TO EXPOSE ANY WRONGDOING previous of
– Attorney General Tom Corbett, who became Governor Tom Corbett,
– a series of interim Attorneys General and
– the staff in the Office of the Attorney General.

The Attorney General has an obligation of non-disclosure for the misdeeds, negligence and sabotage of HER CLIENTS. The DISCLAIMER for the report could not indicate or explain that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality REQUIRED the Attorney General to conceal the misdeeds, negligence and sabotage of her CLIENTS.
MORE INFO: ABOUT THAT SANDUSKY REPORT: THE UNPUBLISHED DISCLAIMER

---

Not so long ago… There was a scandal in the Luzerne County Courthouse where Judges were incarcerating children and receiving kickbacks. Thousands of children were affected. Denied the Rule of Law. Denied their Constitutional Rights. For low grade ‘offenses’ children were jailed for months and years.

The silence of Luzerne County Law Enforcement.
The silence of the Luzerne County Judiciary.
The silence of the Luzerne County Lawyers.
The silence of The Wilkes-Barre Law and Library Association. (The official name of the Luzerne County Bar Association.)
The failure of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to intervene.
The failure of the Judicial Conduct Board to act.
The failure of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to act.
The deliberate misrepresentation, neglect and cover-up of WHAT CONCEALED THE CORRUPTION by the InterBranch Commission on Juvenile Justice.

THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL TERROR OF THE FAMILIES IN LUZERNE COUNTY… BY LAWYERS… with a mandate of Confidentiality.

When Judge Ann Lokuta exposed the scandal and corruption to federal authorities, she was disciplined for breaking the silence and removed from the bench.

Federal Authorities were prevented from prosecuting the KIDS FOR CASH judges for their actual constitutional violations. They were prosecuted on failure to pay taxes on their ill-gotten gains.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevented the federal lawyers from prosecuting the full crimes of the judiciary. Judicial immunity was ‘suggested’ but can not afford immunity for denial of rights protected by the Constitution of the United States.

The McDade-Murtha Amendment was passed in the US Congress which requires ALL FEDERAL INVESTIGATORS AND LAWYERS to follow the Rules of Professional Conduct within the jurisdiction where they are working. Pennsylvania’s Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevented, silenced and undermined the entire Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and all other federal agencies.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information was enacted by EVERY STATE SUPREME COURT gradually from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine). Improperly and Unconstitutionally. The American Bar Association was the author, and lobbied every state supreme court to enact their Rules of Professional Conduct (including Rule 1.6) into law.

The American Bar Association deliberately removed ‘the fraud provisions’ from Rule 1.6 when they were drafting their Model Rules of Professional Conduct. This was done against the very strong and very vocal warnings of the head of the commission drafting the Model Rules. When Robert Kutek died suddenly in January 1983, the membership removed the fraud provisions from Rule 1.6. This deletion made the Model Rules unethical, unlawful, unconstitutional, immoral and ABSOLUTELY CONFIDENTIAL. It is unclear whether it was irony or spite where the commission was then named THE KUTEK COMMISSION after the man who challenged the lawyers on their deliberate failure to consider the ramifications of deleted ‘fraud provisions’ from their Model Rules.

It has been suggested that the National Security Agency (NSA) was created to maintain surveillance on Americans and to take preventative efforts and actions which would continue to conceal that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality had undermined the judiciary in every state.

JUSTICE is an essential part of American Government. It is the FIRST order of business in the preamble of the US Constitution.

“Establish Justice”

Ignoring the denial of constitutional rights has become OBVIOUS nationwide. Edward Snowden was able to expose what was happening at the NSA but was prevented from any explanation of WHY. The explanations offered by the NSA were seen as misinformed and divisive distractions.

---

The efforts of lawyers in state and federal government and the news media to conceal actions surrounding improperly enacted and unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information are prevented from disclosure by Rule 1.6 itself.

Those efforts by lawyers can include a further denial of access to the courts and interference with the administration of justice. AND THOSE EFFORTS which can include fraud in the furtherance and fraud to prevent rectificaton are held confidential and concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

The unconstitutional, lawless, fraudulent and corrupt efforts by lawyers in the court clerks offices are organized by the affiliated bar associations which exist in every major state and federal jurisdiction.

Rule 1.6 mandates nondisclosure which prevents lawyers from exposing the cause of the Constitutional Crisis. Most lawyers have accepted the injustice and been improperly convinced that Rule 1.6 is Attorney Client Privilege. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality has considerably broader application than ACP.

ALL CONFIDENTIALITY FOR THE ENTIRE STATE AND FEDERAL JUDICIARY, EVERY COURT and THE LEGAL PROFESSION NATIONWIDE is addressed within identical or basically similar versions of Rule 1.6 in every state in the US.

ONE UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULE HAS CAUSED THE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IN THE UNITED STATES.

---

AMERICAN INJUSTICE IGNORED

The Foreclosure Crisis in the US was driven by fraudulent, forged and robo-signed deeds filed in foreclosure actions involving over 45 million Americans. Those affected discovered that LAWS did not apply while their constitutional rights were ignored and denied without explanation. The American public questioned why no one was prosecuted for the crimes, the fraud, the forgeries. Rule 1.6 non-disclosure prevented lawyers and law enforcement from revealing OR EVEN ADDRESSING the fraud of their clients (or themselves).

Too many times we have seen District Attorneys stand before the American Public to address police officers who have killed people. The District Attorney, a lawyer, fails to indicate that the police officer is their client. As such, attorney-client privilege prevents disclosure of information which would adversely affect their client.

The apparent Injustice has resulted in demonstrations, violence and riots across the United States. The efforts which misinform and attempt to assign blame based on sex, race, creed, sexuality, nationality, country of origin, etc… only serve to divide the American people who desperately want to believe there is an explanation for what is occurring.

THE EXPLANATION EXISTS.

However, the explanation is prevented by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

The Problem within Rule 1.6 Confidentiality is it’s own mandate of nondisclosure which prevents lawyers from addressing the problem and actively conceals their actions to prevent the constitutional issue from being addressed.

The explanation is that an unconstitutional CONFIDENTIALITY law has been improperly enacted by EVERY state judiciary and the same law prevents the judiciary from disclosing that they have been undone.

Permit me to explain. I AM NOT A LAWYER.

I am not bound by Lawyer Confidentiality which undermines the Rule of Law, the Constitution of the United States and the independence of the Judicial branch of state and federal government.

I am the victim who has survived, documented and persevered through the extreme terror of unconstitutional injustice ignored by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality

I HAVE BEEN DENIED PROTECTION OF THE LAW.

I HAVE BEEN DENIED RIGHTS SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED ACTIONS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT WHICH NEGLECTED THE RULE OF LAW AND ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED TWO (2) DISTRICT ATTORNEYS IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA WHO HAVE NEGLECTED THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE LAW AND THE CONSTITUTION

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ENDURING 20 JUDGES CONDUCTING PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT LAWFUL JURISDICTION AND DUE PROCESS ISSUING ORDERS WHICH ARE NOT SUBSTANTIATED BY LAW OR SUPPORTED BY FACTS.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED DEFECTIVE AND VOID COURT ORDERS WHICH LACK SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION WHICH ARE ENFORCED WITH AGGRESSION AND MALICE WHILE FAILING TO ADDRESS THE DEFECTIVE ORDERS

I HAVE BEEN INCARCERATED FOR CONTEMPT REGARDING THE ENFORCEMENT OF A NON-EXISTENT CHILD SUPPORT ORDER. TACKLED, SHACKLED AND FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM THE COURTROOM AND HELD HOSTAGE FOR $5000 BAIL.

I HAVE BEEN DENIED ENFORCEMENT OF VALID SIGNED SUPPORT ORDERS BY THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS UNIT.

I HAVE BEEN DENIED ACCESS TO A FILE ABOUT ME IN THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS UNIT.

THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS UNIT HAS DELETED FROM THEIR SYSTEM DOCUMENTS PROPERLY FILED BY AN ATTORNEY AND SERVED UPON THE PARTIES AND THE COURT.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED JUDICIAL RETALIATION WITH EXTREME MALICE FOR PETITIONING THE COURT TO ADDRESS THE LACK OF JURISDICTION IN A DEFECTIVE AND VOID DIVORCE DECREE.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE FRAUD, LIES, MISREPRESENTATION AND DISRESPECT OF EVERY OFFICE IN THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTHOUSE. WITHIN FAMILY COURT ADMINISTRATION THEIR PARTICIPATION IN WAS COERCED UNDER EXTREME DURESS AT THE INSTRUCTION OF JUDGES..

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WHERE COURT STAFF INTERCEPTED, INTERFERED AND FORGED DOCUMENTS WITH REGARD TO APPEALS FROM THE LOWER COURTS.

I HAVE BEEN DENIED AND PREVENTED FILED DOCUMENTS AND ORDERS DIRECTLY RELATING TO THE APPEALS IN THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FROM PHILADELPHIA AND BUCKS COUNTIES AND THEIR FAILURE TO ADDRESS THE VIOLATIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS BY THE SUPERIOR COURT STAFF.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE US ATTORNEY AND HIS FAILURE TO ADDRESS THE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS AND FEDERAL CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST ME.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE NON-RESPONSE OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTORS TO THE REPORTED USE OF THE MAIL TO COMMIT FRAUD BY THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT STAFF.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SILENCE FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL REGARDING RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO ADDRESS CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE COMPLETE FAILURE OF THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD TO ADDRESS THE CORRUPTION WITHIN GHT EMONTGOMERY COUNTY JUDICIARY.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL NEGLECT OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WITH REGARD TO VIOLATIONS OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT BY LAWYERS WITHIN COURT ADMINISTRATION, LAWYERS IN THE CLERKS OFFICES OF COUNTY STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS AND LAWYERS EMPLOYED BY LITIGANTS.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE FAILURE AT ALL LEVELS OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TO TAKE ANY ACTION REGARDING CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST ME. Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA), Secret Service, Federal Marshall Service, Pennsylvania State Police, Montgomery County Detectives, Montgomery County Sheriff Department, Montgomery Township Police, Warrington Township Police, Upper Gwynedd Township Police,

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WHERE COURT STAFF INTERCEPTED AND PREVENTED ACCESS TO THE JUDICIARY.

I HAVE WITNESSED THE SHOCK ON THE FACE OF PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR TOM CORBETT WHEN I INTRODUCED MYSELF AND HAND DELIVERED A DOCUMENT ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE MISINFORMATION, DELIBERATE NEGLECT AND FRAUD OF GOVERNOR TOM CORBETT’S OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL.

I HAVE FILED A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND SERVED IT UPON FIFTY SIX (56) ATTORNEYS GENERAL TO ADDRESS THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF RULE 1.6 IN EVERY STATE.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE DELIBERATE FAILURE BY THE CLERKS IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TO FOLLOW THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SUCCESS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 WHERE FIFTY-SIX ATTORNEYS GENERAL DELIBERATELY DEFAULTED IN THE MATTER BEFORE THE FEDERAL COURT.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THAT SUCCESS UNDONE BY FRAUDULENT ACTIONS NEGLECTING FEDERAL LAWS AND RULES OF PROCEDURE AND WHERE FORGED DOCUMENTS WERE UNSUBSTANTIATED … THE LAWYERS/CLERKS IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INTERCEPTED AND PREVENTED ACCESS TO THE JUDICIARY.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED THE DELIBERATE FAILURE BY THE CLERKS IN THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS TO FOLLOW THE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE WHERE THEIR ACTIONS INTERCEPTED AND PREVENTED ACCESS TO THE JUDICIARY.

I HAVE BEEN DENIED PUBLIC ASSISTANCE, HEALTH CARE and SUPPORT.

---

In February 2015 I sought the assistance of the Governor of Pennsylvania Tom Wolf, the Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, and EVERY MEMBER of the state Legislature to regain the lawful possession of my home.

The corrupted and Rule 1.6 tainted Montgomery County judiciary had improperly indicated a lack of jurisdiction with prejudice – intended to prevent me from further effort to regain my home.

The Appeal to the Superior Court intercepted by the lawyers in the clerks office indicated that the lower court decision was affirmed in a forged unsigned ORDER mailed from the court.

The Court had improperly indicated a lack of jurisdiction. I contacted the Legislature to address the ‘gap’ in the jurisdiction of the court.

I contacted the Governor and Attorney General as the Executive branch is responsible for enforcement of the law.

The Courts had improperly removed themselves from any further involvement regarding possession of the home. Rule 1.6 prevents the courts from exposing the corruption of the Montgomery County judiciary.

A defective and void order at the center of the matter had been unlawfully issued by Carolyn Torneta Carluccio.

Judge Carluccio proceeded to prevent the Appeal of her defective order from the Superior Court.

Judge Carluccio aggressively and maliciously retaliated at her defective and void order being documented with the court for correction and exposed. The defective and void order remains unaddressed.

Judge Carlucio was the 16th judge in the matter of Healy v Healy.

Where the defective and void ORDER lacked SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE ONLY SITUATION WHICH NEGATES JUDICIAL IMMUNITY APPLIED to ALL judges in the matter.

JUDGE CARLUCCIO’S HUSBAND WAS THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IN THE ALLEGED LEAK CASE AGAINST KATHLEEN KANE.

Recall, Kathleen Kane had been PERSONALLY ordered by secret orders from unidentified courts to neglect the responsibilities of her office.

When the Attorney General attempted to investigate the unconstitutional issues related to the Appeal in the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 521 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Discovery that parts of the court record in the case which were not forwarded to the Superior Court, as required, had been sealed through the improper actions and manipulations of an investigative Grand Jury.

The Montgomery County machine had demonstrated a terroristic level of corruption. Their effort to conceal the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality is boundless and will strike at anyone.

SO THEY DID.

I was arrested on March 13, 2015 for a purported terroristic threat in my letter to the Governor.

The ‘threatened’ proceeded to document a delusional and incoherent five page document which planned, provisioned and trained for my execution. This document is undoubtedly a TERRORISTIC THREAT… by the people who stole my home… who had used the court documents indicating their fraudulent conveyance to claim a $400,000 settlement from the title insurance.

Within a month, a document indicating the satisfaction of their $400,000 mortgage was filed with the Recorder of Deeds.

Exposing the ruthless and terroristic tactics used by the Montgomery County District Attorney’s Office to ignore and conceal their negligence and constitutional denials further raised the issue of the volume of murder suicides ending cases within the Court of Common Pleas which were all concealed pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of information.

Exposing an egregious system of unconstitutional injustice which has existed and been concealed in Pennsylvania since 1987 threatened to expose a MASSIVE VIOLATION OF THE PUBLIC TRUST orchestrated by the American Bar Association and its affiliate organizations in every state.

WHEN YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS AND NO PROTECTION OF THE LAW… YOU HAVE NO ESCAPE.

I had no other choice but to discover the source of unconstitutional injustice ignored and to persevere.
I had not anticipated that the ABA members who profited by taking advantage of Americans attempting to survive or escape silent injustice, had initiated a program whjich undermined the judicial branch in every state and federally.

AN UNIMAGINABLE VIOLATION OF THE PUBLIC TRUST – a trust which was accorded to the Judiciary as a necessity.

---

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality is a law which mandates non-disclosure by lawyers within Pennsylvania. WHERE IT AFFECTS THE SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS OF LITIGANTS, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania was without the proper authority to enact the law, an unconstitutional nullity which would be enforced until declared unconstitutional.

AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS LAW UNTIL IT IS DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Then, it never was a law. An unconstitutional nullity which can provide NO DEFENSE to person accused of violating the rights which are secured and protected by the Constitution of the United States.

---

Governor Tom Wolf, alone, has the only lawful constitutional authority to begin resolution of this national crisis.

As a non-lawyer, the Governor may take action to remove this improperly enacted and unconstitutional law. Lawyers on the governors staff have been persistent in efforts which intercept interfere and prevent a meeting to address this serious issue with the Governor. (Staff lawyers actions are concealed pursuant to unconstitutional Rule 1.6.)

Pursuant to the Pennsylvania Constitution, the Governor can call the Legislature to assemble to address the issue.

Pursuant to the Pennsylvania Constitution, ONLY the Legislature has authority to suspend a law.
The leadership in the Legislature have prevented the issue from being presented, addressed and resolved. (Legislative Leadership are lawyers whose actions are concealed pursuant to unconstitutional Rule 1.6.)

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court was without proper constitutional authority when enacting a law which affects substantive rights of litigants. Rule 1.6 prevents lawful action by the Judiciary to address their own undoing. Rule 1.6 prevents the Pennsylvania Supreme Court from addressing the constitutionality of their own unconstitutional law whether by petition or sua sponte.

---

IN THE INTEREST OF RESTORING…
THE RIGHTS SECURED AND PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND
THE RULE OF LAW ENACTED BY THE PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATURE,

I respectfully request that the Honorable Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ORDER the Governor’s Office of General Counsel to cease and desist in their efforts to prevent my meeting with Governor Tom Wolf.

And Where lawful, OGC encouragement and efforts to accomplish the scheduling of that meeting quickly would be beneficial to all Pennsylvanians, and ALL AMERICANS.

Where the Montgomery County District Attorney has undermined and neglected to provide the Court of Common Pleas with proper jurisdiction by failing to adhere to the Rule of Law, and by having neglected the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure and having failed to address the their denial of rights which are secured and protected by the Constitution of the United States…

Where those lawless, unconstitutional and corrupt actions have previously been permitted to be ignored and concealed pursuant to unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Confidentiality…

I respectfully request that this Honorable Supreme Court, as a court of first jurisdiction in any matter in the Commonwealth, immediately ORDER that all criminal charges against DEFENDANT, Terance Healy, be DISMISSED with prejudice.

I respectfully request that ALL THOSE INVOLVED in the false allegations and corrupt efforts (abuse of power under color of law, official oppression, prosecutorial misconduct, constitutional violations etc…) which intimidate and threaten the life and liberty of DEFENDANT, Terance Healy, be immediately arrested for their crime(s) and taken into custody to be prosecuted without any option for BAIL (as those involved have conspired to document, train and conceal the a clear threat to murder the Defendant.

I am one man who has survived the terror of having no protection of the law and the complete denial of constitutional rights.
I am under constant threat of further abuse and oppression. It is ALOT for one man to bear. I beg your help… SAFELY TO ARRIVE AT MY HOME.

I persevere,

Terance Healy

Why would the Montgomery County District Attorney …
…who has never permitted an investigation into crimes against me.
…who has never responded to any criminal complaint since 2008
(Neither did her predecessor Bruce Castor in 2007)
…who has concealed evidence of the provison, plan and training for my murder
…who has ignored every law
…who had denied every constitutionally protected right
…who has ignored every constitutionally protected right
…who has has her office lie over the phone
…who has never returned any phone message
…who has never responded to voicemail
…who has never responded to letters
…who has never responded to tweets
…who has blatantly ignored her oath of office
…who has blatantly ignored ethics
…who has blatantly ignored morality
…who has concealed the botched investigations of her staff
…who has introduced over 80+ drug addicted and HIV infected prostitutes into my life as Confidential Informants (in attempts to set me up) EPIC FAILURE!

Block me from her Twitter feed?
Block me from the Pennsylvania DAs Twitter feed?

Yet, Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Vetri Ferman dares to challenge my competence in an attempt to undermine the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

They must be teaching all kinds of twisted games at her DA Institute.

(To Various in State Government and Media)

I would appreciate an meeting with the Governor to discuss an improperly enacted and unconstitutional law which is being abused to undermine the judiciary and the government.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Considerable volumes of Information are available at www.www.work2bdone.com/live

This matter is Important to every Pennsylvanian and every American.
Every Person Matters.

…..

The Montgomery County DA has filed with the court seeking to require an Attorney represent me in a Competency Hearing.

By forcing a Rule 1.6 impeded lawyer upon me against my will, my rights can continue to be ignored completely. Forever.

…..

The Attorney Client Privilege portion of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information prevents a District Attorney from exposing and or prosecuting a member of their staff for deliberate and intentional Incompetence.

The Attorney for the Commonwealth can continue harassment without rapproach.  To do so would expose a major failure in the Judicial system.

This is NOT to be confused with an occasional lapse, prosecutorial misconduct. 

This is the deliberate and intentional denial of the Rule of Law.

This is the deliberate and intentional denial of rights secured and protected by the Constitution of the United States.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevents this egregious tactic from being addressed by any Attorney or by any court.

It is preposterous and malicious for the DA to challenge my competence.

My competence is being challenged because I have been successfully addressing the Incompetence abuse of power under color of law and the official oppression of the District Attorneys office.

The actions of the District Attorney are corrupt and unsupported in the Rules of Criminal Procedure with no basis in Law or case law.

In the matter attempted to be brought before the Court:

The Court is without jurisdiction which is required by Law.

The DA has failed to demonstrate any element of jurisdiction for the court.

The DA has failed to follow any law or Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The DA has ignored my rights under the PA Constitution.

The DA has ignored my rights under the Constitution of the US.

The DA has participated in concealing the provisioning of weapons for the single purpose of killing me.

The DA has concealed and participated in the efforts towards  the planning and training for my murder.

The DA has failed to investigate EVERY crime committed against me.

Their deliberate Incompetence is the tactical.

The DA has neglected an Arraignment coercing under extreme duress and threat of arrest a signature on a Waiver of Arraignment. The charges listed as ‘see transcript’.  A transcript was not available or provided.

The  Complainants identified in the current filing are prevented by law from filing a complaint to retaliate against a civil matter which the courts refused to accept jurisdiction to resolve.  Improperly.  Rule 1.6 permits concealing the deliberate interception and intference by lawyers in the clerks staff.

The deliberate failures within the Montgomery County District t Attorneys office have caused a  complete and abso!ute denial of the Rule of law and all rights.

The Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane has been personally ordered to neglect t the responsibilities of her office. Likely the botched investigations and abuse from Montgomery County Law Enforcement has caused a BOTCHED effort  in the Office of the Attorney General which has prevented the Attorney General from addressing the lawlessness.

This is caused pursuant to improperly enacted and unconstitutional Rule 1.6.

Any attempt to bring the matter before a federal court would find that the improperly enacted and unconstitutional Pennsylvania Rule 1.6 applies to lawyers in the federal courts and the Court of Appeals by way of local rules.

There is no escaping the deliberate concealed manipulation, interference and interception of the lawyers at every level of the court pursuant to Rule 1.6.

I would appreciate the immediate effort be made for me to meet with Governor Tom Wolf.

He alone can take action to remove this improperly enacted and unconstitutional law.

The Governor can call the Legislature to assemble to address the issue.

Only the Legislature has authority to suspend a law.

The leadership in the Legislature have prevented the issue from being presented, addressed and resolved.

The Supreme Court who was without proper authority to enact a law which affects substantive rights has caused it to be illegal for the Court to address the unconstitutional law either by petition or sua sponte.
Their own Confidentiality law requires the nondisclosure of their unconstitutional action.  Rule 1.6.

The volume of paperwork and torment being caused by Montgomery County is criminal, corrupt,unconstitutional, egregious, malicious, and unconscionable.

I appreciate any effort to secure a meeting with the Governor to explain the issues involved.

I am one man who survived the terror of having no protection of the law and then complete denial of constitutional rights.  I am competent.  I am under constant threat of abuse and oppression.  It is ALOT for one man to bear.  I beg your help.

I persevere,

Terance Healy

Click to access CCF07292015_00000.pdf

Please acknowledge the ATTACHED LETTER which was provided in the incomplete INFORMATION from District Attorney Risa Ferman.  Ferman’s signature was forged on the INFORMATION document.  (Apparently, forgery is big in law enforcement to sabotage cases)

The document was written the day after my arrest.
The document Is written by the woman who is living in my home.  I have never met her.
The document is all events which occurred without my knowledge or involvement.
She is deluded, paranoid and apparently seeing my ghost.  I have not been near the house.  I have no need to scare or threaten them.  I was continuing to seek the enforcement of the law by contacting proper government officials.

When the judiciary removed themselves improperly, I wrote to the Governor, Legislature and AG for help.  I used the word “PERIL” ONCE in my letter.
For that I was charged with terroristic threats, stalking and more and arrested.

All laws have been ignored.
All procedures have been ignored.
All rights have been denied and ignored.

The letter attached is a threat which was concealed by the DA.  It shows the provisioning for weapons, planning and training, and their target is me.  My murder this is a threat.  Written by someone whose deluded ideations center on me while I am unaware of any of it.

Induced by police.  Concealed by Police.

Encouraged and concealed by the DA while they prosecute me for the crime that is being committed against me.  Terrorizing my life.

I have asked to file a complaint… No response from any law enforcement agency.

The people living in my home used the information I had filed in the obstructed case to file for the title insurance and have paid their $400,000 mortgage off based on the FRAUD I REPORTED.  The fraudulent conveyance of my home.  They have profited from their crime of fraud.  They still have illegal possession of my home.  They have no valid deed.  They have never attempted to produce any valid documents ts which demonstrate lawful ownership.  Their documents, though repeatedly filed with the Recorder of Deeds, represent fraud.

Since 2007, Every crime against me is ignored and endorsed by the DA.  Every crime I report is ignored.

I seek equal protection of the law. 

All the messages where I felt the police and district attorneys office were plotting to murder me ARE CONFIRMED BY THIS LETTER WHICH WAS IN THE POSSESSION OF THE DA SINCE March 14, 2015, THE DAY AFTER MY ARREST.  I was right.  I was threatened.  I was ignored.

I wish to file a Criminal Complaint against the Millers, Officer Dougherty, and the District Attorneys Office.

Information in the CHRIA database will corroborate the terror I have experienced since 2007 at the hands of Montgomery County DA Risa Ferman and her predecessor Bruce Castor.

Castor described the position of DA as “a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”
His Facebook page on 12/31/2014

Please acknowledge this letter and 5 page attachment.

Please help end this nightmare which has prevented my life since 2007.

Please forward to all appropriate sources to reopen secretly closed investigations where they were deliberately botched by law enforcement to prevent any action by the AG or alternate law enforcement. 

Yes, I know and recognize that botched investigations are concealed by Attorney Client Privilege Rule 1.6… While my life is further terrorized.  Improperly enacted and unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

Please contact the governor’s office to encourage a meeting.

Only the Governor can call the Legislature to suspend the law.
The Senators and Reps have been blocked by leadership and prevented from  raising the issue.
The Judiciary cannot sua sponte raise or address the issue of their own undoing.

This requires the Governor to act.   I cannot get past the gatekeepers in OGC -lawyers.

Getting that meeting helps the AG as well as all Pennsylvanians and ALL Americans.

BTW, Donald Trump’s sister is on the 3rd Circuit Court where lawyers in the clerks office prevented the  judiciary from reviewing the matter. Rule 1.6 permits CONCEALING their deliberate fraud in the furtherance.  This interception/interference is handled through bar associations in every state and federal jurisdiction.

Please lets get this done.  You cannot imagine my fear after 10 years of this type of terror. 20% of my life has been affected by this injustice.  The American Bar Association membership profits from their confidential injustice.  Rule 1.6 is their doing.  It is their GOLDMINE.

Terance