A Terroristic Divorce

The Defendant has no transportation to the courthouse on such short notice. Hearings require notice. He is attempting to prepare a defense for the trial which has been scheduled with haste after three years of perpetual delays and bench warrant threats. ALL issues presented to the Court remain neglected.

The Defendant has been receiving reports of the District Attorneys Office communicating with witnesses for the Defense.

The Defendant had called attention to the necessity of a FORMAL ARRAIGNMENT, and was ignored.

The Defendant had called attention to the necessity of a PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE, and was ignored.

The Defendant had called attention to the necessity of the file from the Public Defender, and was ignored. The Defendant reminds the court of the egregious injustice which has been ignored.

The Defendant had called attention to the failure to provide Discovery Materials, and was ignored.

The Defendant has kept the court updated and informed of the procedural negligence and deliberate failures to address or resolve any question by the District Attorney’s office, and was ignored.

The Defendant again requests a statement of the Jurisdiction of this court in this matter which the Court has ignored every request, at every proceeding, in every opinion, and on every order.

The lack of jurisdiction having been called to the attention of the parties, the Court and the General Assembly of Pennsylvania which is responsible for the jurisdiction of the Courts. The Defendant requests an answer in this regard: A statement containing the elements of jurisdiction and addressing the defects previously indicated and documented with the Court.

A Court lacking jurisdiction to decide the matter would also lack jurisdiction to recuse from the matter, where the District Attorney has caused the issue perhaps the resignation of the judge is more appropriate.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Defendant
…since 2007

Seems my every effort to resolve any qwuestion or to prepare to present a defense is being met with chaos. It seems they never imagined I would do such a thing. Where would they get that idea? They aren’t handling their own chaos very well.

“If you can keep your head while all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you.”

I can. Every day.

The people who use this chaos as intimidation and distraction tactics can’t comprehend… It’s been like that everyday since 2007.

I can keep my head while all about me are losing theirs and blaming it on me. I call that Thursday, …or everyday.

Truth is strong.

Their lies and tactics to overwhelm… not so powerful.

Terror tactics to negotiate a plea deal. I don’t negotiate with terrorists.
I know they are capable of three years of nightmarish terror harassment and threats. Their prosecution is far more violent than the crimes they allege. After three years, they want to drop the charges and want a plea deal? After three years of hell? Ridiculous. A court without jurisdiction has no boundary; it has only the violent power of a bully.

Phil,

Please remind the ADA of the lack of the elements of any crime remains where the arbitrary and ever-changing documents neglect definition.

There is neither an identifiable scope of time nor identifiable incident.

If there had been a FORMAL ARRAIGNMENT AS DEFINED BY LAW, I WOULD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED THE INFORMATION.

CLEARLY, I AM BEING EXPECTED TO PREPARE A DEFENSE OF EVERY MOMENT IN TIME SINCE 2007.

There has been no Bill of Particulars. Even when directly asked In court and on the record to provide this information, which has been requested repeatedly since the arrest and appears on the record of each proceeding, the ADA just begins to read the general description of random crimes which have no nexus to me.

If the ADA finds the reports of their detectives who where directed to abandon every investigation since 2007 while providing no result of their investigation, the negligence of the detectives does not cause a crime to occur. One might argue that the District Attorney was attempting to provoke frustration which has never given rise to their desired result. No crime. No fights. No disturing the peace. No suicide. NO KIDDING.

CLEARLY, PHIL, YOU CAN’T EVEN PROVOKE AN ARGUMENT WITH YOUR INSIPID AND MORONIC ATTITUDE AND FAILURE TO ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING.

See the LAW which requires the crimes to be defined with at least some specificity has been Ignored. As have the Rules which also affect JURISDICTION.

The members of the legislature will likely have questions about this complete abandonment of due process and procedure absent jurisdiction. A three year malicious act of terror perpetrated for the denial and prevention of justice.

I have meetings scheduled most of the day Thursday.

Motion for Rule 600. Motion for Bill of Particulars. Motion for Formal Arraignment. It probably seems ridiculous to have to ask them to define the crimes they are alleging. But, they have not indicated any event aside from the one which they have known all along failed to meet any definition of a threat of violent crime intently delivered to disturb the public order.

The police reports do indicate alot of police activity. Cheif Miller causing a neighboring police department to alarm the Miller family and then protect the Millers while aggesively accusing me seems to have completely left me out of their crime. Strange they blame everything on me while failing to indicate my direct involvement in anything.

They have no case. They know this. It’s why they haven’t presented any specific information at any time.

How about you refile the Motion 600?. You might find the form on a Google search.
You could always submit the one which was bounced by the Clerk because of Tom Carluccio or yourself being on top of nothing.

BTW, every one of my filings will be submitted as an Admission. The jury will see the complete NEGLIGENCE of the ADA and the perverted injustice of the judge.

G’day.