A Terroristic Divorce

Cleary, Bruce Castor still follows the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Playbook. When responding to anything which could be important BE SURE TO INCLUDE ERRORS AND DISINFORMATION.

In his email to OAG employees:

“I have learned that some of you received emails notifying you that your names may be included in the Buckley Sandler Report.”

– The news reports indicate those involved received letters, not email.

– The Gansler Report has been renamed?  And named for the law firm where the SPECIAL ATTORNEY GENERAL works.

“I want to reassure you that the report and all attachments are now with me for review, and cannot be released without my approval.”

– Castor has had the report for months.  Since mid- May.

– There is nothing in the Doug Gansler contract which indicates the report is to be delivered to Castor, as counsel or as Acting AG.

– There is no requirement for the report to be approved by Castor before release.  HE JUST MADE THAT UP.

“I am reminding General Gansler of that today.”

– I wonder how hard Doug Gansler laughed at that reminder from Castor.

“When there is more to report, I will let you know. Please don’t be anxious. I am conferring with Senior Staff on how to proceed.”

– His tenure as Acting AG will be less than 100 hours.  If the staff find his words reassuring then they didn’t read the other article about how everyone hates Bruce Castor.

It seems to me that Castor has double crossed the Governor and the OAG in his efforts to prevent the Gansler Report.  Why else would the Governor act fast by bringing Bruce Beemer back to the OAG.

Unless Bruce has written ANOTHER MANIFESTO? Commissioner Bruce Castor “schooled in how to really hurt you” and “to [screw] others”

I wrote a few weeks ago about Bruce Castor and Stacy Parks Miller. Where Stacy had failed to recognize the difference between an ‘abuse of power’ and a ‘crime’. A nuance of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality Privileges.
When a District Attorney forges a Judge’s signature, it is a crime.
When a member of the DA’s staff forges a judge’s signature, the District Attorney can ignore it. THAT is an ‘abuse of power’.

The Gansler Report is the mechanism by which the government can be called to correct itself.

On a personal note: Without Bruce Castor there never would have been a Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6. In 2007, District Attorney Bruce Castor was the first person to whom I had turned for help when my divorce became terroristic. Castor did nothing. NOTHING. Not so much as a phone call or response to any letter about the corruption, injustice and unconstitutional actions in Montgomery County. It was too late, once the County had joined the effort to destroy me, the matter was off the rails. I would be harassed, investigated, ignored, homeless, destitute, no custody, no visitation, forced to pay child support while unemployed, arrested and jailed for violating a non-existent order, robbed, beaten, demeaned, humiliated etc…

The experience began in January 2007. It was not until 2013 that the statement at the top of this web page was answered. One improperly enacted and collaterally unconstitutional law which defies correction or resolution. Rule 1.6 COnfidentiality of Information. Every level of state and federal law enforcement wasn’t ignoring me, they were keeping the problem CONFIDENTIAL.

I have no obligation for confidentiality. I have no respect for those who watch people destroyed and maintain silence because of a SINGLE BAD LAW enacted in every state and leading to a Constitutional Crisis in the USA – that lawyers can’t quite explain away.

Justice is coming.

http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/08/porn_email_report_notices.html

1. One particular predatory tactic is to find out enough information to explain the issue in a manner consistent with the belief you want to encourage. This can later be expanded to generally explain a story while subtly modifying it to the interpretation.

2. Isolation. Never letting the target out of sight. Restrict or prevent interaction with family or friends.

3. Physically and emotionally wear down the target. Lie. Embarass. Intimidate. This can be done with words or gestures, expressions of disapproval, verbal insults, badgering, or more dehumanizing efforts.

4. Limit contact to others similarly targeted creates a form of peer pressure.

5. Repetition of the message. Present the same phrases over and over. Emphasize certain key words or phrases. Mimicking the rhythm of the human heartbeat. This can be enhanced with lighting that’s not too dim or too harsh and a room temperature to encourage relaxation.

6. Never letting the target have time to think. Prevent time alone. Bombard the target with repetition his can mean simply never letting the victim have time alone, or it can mean bombarding the victim with repetition while discouraging questions.

7. Presenting an “us vs. them” mentality where the stated goal is right and the outside world is wrong.

8. Reward and threaten punishment. Positive experiences are the reward for thinking as desired. Threaten punishment for disobedience.

9. Repeat and involve. Test in several ways with the results determining how much reinforcement is required.

10. Committing criminal acts together builds the relationship.

11. Do NOT allow the target to become aware of how he or she was manipulated.

12. Do NOT allow exposure to multiple options, or contradictions which challenge the desired beliefs.

13. Discourage individual decisions.

14. Create anxiety about making decisions and excuse shame about making a “wrong” decision.

15. Master emotions to make people receptive to your contrived feelings.

16. Convince others that you’ll be very distressed if you don’t get what you want in a calm manner using techniques for making your needs sound very convincing.

17. Establish similarity. Mirror body language.

18. Pacing and intonation patterns are persuasive methods for convincing people to do something.

19. Charismatic people have a tendency to get what they want.
– Smile and control the room.
– Make eye contact.
– Address their feelings.
– Show them that you really care about them—even if you don’t.
– Exude confidence – people will be much more likely to take you seriously and to give in to your needs.
– Be confident when you say something whether it’s true or just another creation.
– Be glib when addressing any challenges.

20. Read people. Different emotional and psychological actions are effective for different reasons.

21. Where susceptible to emotional responses to get what you want, you’ll have to play to emotions until they feel for you and give you what you want.

22. Other people have a strong guilt reflex. With these people, the answer is obvious — make them feel guilty for not giving you what you want until they give in.

23. Some people are more receptive to a rational approach. The logically minded, informed people need facts and evidence before making a decision. This may require persuasive efforts.

A). First make an unreasonable request, knowing it will be rejected, and then follow it up by a more reasonable request. It will sound much more appealing in comparison.

B). Make an unusual request before the real request. An unusual request throws a person off guard so much that he can’t think to disagree.

C). To reach a rational person, you have to keep emotion out of it or you won’t get what you want. Act like what you want is the only logical thing to do. Make the person feel ridiculous for not seeing it your way.

D). NEVER break character. DO NOT EVER ADMIT TO ANY TACTIC.

Ready for the jaw dropping surprise?

The above information are the documented tactics used by cults and con artists for brainwashing and manipulating people.

Now ask yourself why the District Attorney and the Judge are employing tactics instead of fact, truthfulness and candor. Why are brainwashing and manipulative tactics being used to DISMISS, MISDIRECT AND IGNORE THE TRUTH in a proceeding which seeks to learn the TRUTH?

All of the above were demonstrated during the hearings to prosecute Kathleen Kane. The targets of the manipulations were the jury.

The jury had the addition affect caused by the instructions of the judge which did NOT allow for any finding other than guilty.

Brainwashing and manipulation tactics should not be encouraged nor endorsed in the justice system.

Where those testifying are also demonstrated and admitted liars who have received immunity for any and every false statement in their past, present and future… the proceeding becomes a farce which only purports to seek the truth.

DEMONSTRATING THAT THE SYSTEM OF JUSTICE IS VERY VERY BROKEN.

I HAVE FOUND IT MORE USEFUL TO POST QUOTES. Use a person’s own words and statements.
(Second-hand snarky comments and opinions from the unaware and uninvolved people… and pundits… Not here. Though some may require reading between the lines.)

Kathleen Kane
“I have been honored to serve the people of Pennsylvania and I wish them health and safety in all their days,”

When asked about her future, Kane pointed out she has some legal issues to work through.

Kathleen Kane
“I try to do the best job I can every day. And I have no regrets. I hope that people see that we’ve done our best. . . . And, you know, sometimes the price is high.”

Kathleen Kane
“It’s time for me to focus on other things, and it’s time for Pennsylvanians to move forward,”

Kathleen Kane
“Somebody has told me that your future is always brighter than your past.”

Governor Wolf
“I implore Attorney General Kane to do what is right: Put the commonwealth’s residents first and step down,”

Governor Wolf
“Her decision to resign is the right one, and will allow the people of Pennsylvania to finally move on.”

Gerald Shargel
“But we have not lost our resolve. We will continue this litigation. We will continue this fight because we believe that our client has been wrongfully accused of this conduct. We firmly believe that day will come.”

Gerald Shargel
“We have been denied the opportunity to mount a full defense.”

Gerald Shargel
“We believe our defense was compromised, and we will fight that to the end.”

Josh Shapiro
“This is another sad chapter for our Commonwealth and a reminder of how hard we need to work together in Pennsylvania to restore the public trust in our democracy.”

“We should remember that the real victims of these scandals are the people of Pennsylvania who’ve been left behind by a government that often isn’t working for them. We need to restore integrity to our justice system so that the people’s business – protecting consumers, fighting the heroin epidemic, and keeping our communities safe – comes first.”

Justice is coming!

I have waited a few days to give all the information, activities and WTF-edness time to get sorted and allow my brain a chance to recompile.

I still believe in Kathleen Kane.

I understand THAT statement will be promptly challenged by many… the haters, the political operatives, the disillusioned, etc…

I will post an expanded explanation of the logic behind my opinion. I do some of my best thinking while typing. (The programmer side of me that analyzes as I write. IF, THEN, ELSE. It’s logical.)

There’s more to it than just a vibe, feeling, a personal want, or denial.

Not only do I still believe in KATHLEEN KANE, I have even more respect for her.
– I had no choice but to be in the litigious situation caused by my wife and her lawyers.
– I believe that when Kathleen Kane found herself personally ORDERED to neglect the duties of the Office of the Attorney General she investigated the unusual ‘secret order from unidentified courts’ and as a result she became the target of a very aggressive campaign to conceal the RULE 1.6 issue.

Most aspects are extensively over-documented at www.work2bdone.com/live. Post vary based on the audience intended. If one post doesn’t quite make sense, try another.

I attended the Montgomery County hearings each day. Between subtle and obvious observations, events and statements, there is reason to believe that IT AIN’T OVER QUITE YET.

Justice is coming.

Imagine not being able to explain – even to your parents watching you being maligned and harassed publicly.  Remaining silent for years.   I met a man yesterday.  I told him he should be very proud of his daughters.  He accepted the compliment as any parent would… 

It was only then that I realized that he didn’t know.  Well, Of course not.  I just hadn’t imagined it.  

My one-sided conversation, which has at times included the occasional expletive (and maybe more often than polite), … But, I knew.  I was allowed to communicate.  I knew the reason for the silence and for the lack of a response.  I was allowed to voice my frustration… All the while, I understood and I BELIEVED.

The convo quickly changed to UM… something um else.  A shared laugh.  A ‘what was that guy talking about’ conversation was likely avoided. Or um hopefully avoided.

Who could imagine my respect for the person I was supposed to hate could go deeper?  Hopefully, someone who had no one else to talk to … gained necessary insight from the one-sided convos and therapeutic thought processes and logic of someone who needs to believe that JUSTICE IS COMING…and that all lawyers are not bad.  But, an improperly enacted and unconstitutional law can make an entire profession a party to deception, corruption and treason.

“I wake up every day knowing that I’m right. I’m right. If I thought I was wrong, if I thought I did something wrong, I would never put anyone through this. Never. But I know I’m right. And I know there’s a greater good to this.

I don’t want to sound like I think I’m some sort of martyr. If anybody asked me to choose this, would I choose it? Probably not. I’d probably say, ‘No, thank you.’

But I’m in it now. I guess I just see a reason for it. And I do have faith. I have a lot of faith that good conquers evil.”

“When you make a little graph about it, you’ve got the judge, the prosecutor, and the defense attorney.

How the hell are you supposed to go in [to court] and expect you’re getting any justice?

And to me, it felt like there’s now total chaos in the system, and I’ve never seen that before.

If I talk to other lawyers, they’ll say, ‘Oh, we’ve known for years the state Supreme Court has been corrupt. Oh, the Disciplinary Board? That’s been a joke for years.’ But I never saw it. So to me, it was a shocking moment.”

“I knew that if I resigned, this whole debacle, this whole network, none of this would have come out. And I think it’s a good thing I didn’t resign, because maybe the path I’m on is to show the problem, and maybe someone can fix it.”

The media has directed a considerable amount of effort at ignoring the Constitutional Crisis which the US is facing. The injustices witnessed by the entire population and repeatedly ignored by law enforcement find NO Acceptable explanation or support in the US Constitution. Yet, Prosecutors/Lawyers are making statements blaming race, sex, nationality, hate, anger, corruption, police, etc…

THE AMERICAN MEDIA DELIVERS THIS UNACCEPTABLE MESSAGE TO A POPULATION IN DISBELIEF. Even more shocking are their statements suggesting that JUSTICE is being served. Due process is being followed. But, how can THAT be true. Clearly, American Injustice is being ignored. The neglect is NOT Constitutional. BUT, A CONFIDENTIALITY LAW IS BEING FOLLOWED BY LAWYERS. The law is being followed, BUT, no one is addressing that the law is not only BAD, but a confidentiality law which is only required of lawyers has a collateral affect on the constitutional rights of individual Americans.

The government is ignoring the Constitution.

So why would our elected representatives in every state and federally neglect their responsibilities to govern in accordance with the supreme law of the land. What happened? How? Why has no one addressed the crisis.

WHAT HAPPENED?
RULE 1.6 Confidentiality of Information was enacted by each state supreme Court from 1984 thru 2009.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality was no longer discretionary. Lawyers are OBLIGATED to maintain the confidentiality of privileged information. The ethical choice of Lawyers to decide when to disclose and or reveal information became a MANDATE OF NON-DISCLOSURE with permission to commit fraud in the furtherance to prevent disclosure

Where the withheld information can cause the denial of a person’s Constitutional rights, Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional. The Collaterally unconstitutional law which requires lawyers to be silent further defies and prevents its own resolution.

THE PROBLEM:. Each state judiciary has improperly enacted an unconstitutional law. The courts lack any jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of a law which they themselves have enacted.
– a clear conflict of interest for the judiciary to address their unconstitutional law.
– exposing and addressing the improperly enacted law will adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary.
– the state supreme courts DO NOT HAVE authority to enact an unconstitutional law.
BUT… WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THEY DO? BECAUSE, THEY DID.

ANY LAW IS LAW UNTIL SUCH TIME AS IT IS FOUND TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Only at that time, the law is a nullity. NO LAW. Repugnant to the Constitution.

As if it had never existed, the bad law, a nullity can provide no defense or support for anyone who has acted to deny a person’s Constitutional rights.

Where the state supreme courts are not able to address or resolve their improper law, THE LEGISLATURE MUST ACT TO SUSPEND THE LAW. Suspension would permit the court to work with the Legislature to address the problem.

BUT, Lawyers in the Legislature are mandated to protect the integrity of the courts. The improperly enacted and UNCONSTITUTIONAL law prevents the Legislature from exposing the issue and acting to resolve the matter.

While 30 plus years of injustice ignored by confidentiality will surely affect the integrity of the court.
Continuing to ignore the issue also has an adverse affect on the integrity of the courts.
Continuing to Ignore does nothing to improve the integrity of the courts.
Continuing to ignore does not restore the independence of the judiciary – an essential element of jurisdiction.

Non-lawyers in the legislature are permitted to address the issue, BUT Lawyers in the Legislature are preventing their action.

The improperly enacted unconstitutional confidentiality law is preventing its own removal.

The Governor could call the legislature to assemble to address the issue. (UNLESS THE GOVERNOR IS A LAWYER ALSO MANDATED UNDER THE LAW.)

The non-lawyer Governor’s staff includes lawyers who prevent the governor from being properly informed of the issue. You cannot meet with PA Governor Tom Wolf without being cleared through the Office of General Counsel. Access has been prevented. The Governor is being misinformed by his lawyers who are permitted to take any actions which prevent exposure and resolution. When committing fraud in the furtherance lawyers are protected by confidentiality and non-disclosure.

HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?
The American Bar Association promoted their Rules of Professional Conduct to each state supreme Court as a Code of Ethics to be enacted into law. The ABA effort was deliberately flawed and executed with knowledge of the unethical immoral and unconstitutional affect on Americans. Against the strong efforts of the Robert Kutek, the removal of the fraud provisions from Rule 1.6 Confidentiality was adopted by the ABA after Kutek’s sudden death by heart attack in January 1983.

Once enacted into law by the state supreme courts, the lawyers at the ABA were also mandated to conceal the unconstitutional confidentiality. They caused the crisis. Their membership profited from their treason. All lawyers were required to conceal the treason by the ABA as it undermined the judiciary and affected their independence. A violation of THE PUBLIC TRUST.

NO FEDERAL ATTENTION
The McDade-Murtha Act mandates federal lawyers and investigators to follow the Rules in affect in the jurisdiction where they are working/investigating. This prevents the federal government from actions.

A RESOLUTION?
The ONLY available lawful alternative for resolution requires ALL LAWYERS to stand back and permit the non-lawyers in government to address the improperly enacted and unconstitutional law. Not participating in the effort to suspend the law, by their lawful inaction and silence, the ethical lawyers will have adhered to the law.

Once the law is suspended, the lawyers may join and participate in the discussion and resolution effort. The state supreme courts can also participate. The Legislatures can enact the laws necessary to prevent any recurrence and address their inability to taken action.

ONE OTHER POSSIBILITY…
The Montgomery County Pennsylvania District Attorney can falsely accuse Pennsylvania Attorney General of a crime. The crime could be shrouded in confidentiality and nondisclosure which may not be presented or explained to the public. The matter can be drawn out by the courts while the career and integrity of the Attorney General is attacked. Fraud in the furtherance by lawyers is protected by confidentiality and permits False information to be presented to the media by the Prosecutors who seek
-to mislead and misinform the public in an effort to continue and conceal the treason of the ABA,
-to continue the denial of the constitutional rights of Americans,
-to actively conspire to deny and ignore the law, the state Constitution and the Constitution of the United States
-to proceed with prosecution of false charges in a court without proper jurisdiction
-to demonstrate the judiciary has been undermined and usurped where motions in the matter are DENIED in unsigned, single-sentence orders left unsubstantiated and unsupported by law.

Improperly enacted and unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevents the court from any explanation which exposes the bad law AND prevents the court from indicating their lack of jurisdiction AND prevents the judiciary from recusing from the matter because it would require an explanation which would expose the unconstitutional Confidentiality.

The Superior Court is similarly hindered. Their responses to Appeals have also been DENIED in unsigned, single-sentence orders left unsubstantiated and unsupported by law.

Any court which lacks jurisdiction is not authorized to conduct hearings or decide any question brought before the court. Jurisdiction is a necessary
element to any matter before the court. The unconstitutional confidentiality is requiring the Court of Common Pleas to perpetrate a farce.

The lawyers are PREVENTED from exposing the farce where MANDATED to Non-disclosure.

CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE ARE AGGRESSIVELY MANDATED AND ENFORCED BY THE SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY BOARD.
…UNTIL SUCH TIME AS ANY LAWYER IS PRESENTING A DEFENSE BEFORE A COURT AND IS LAWFULLY PERMITTED TO DISCLOSE PRIVILEGED INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR THEIR DEFENSE.

When the Montgomery County hearing begins, Attorney General Kathleen Kane will finally be permitted to break her silence and expose the cause of the constitutional crisis in American which permits injustice to be ignored.

In December 2015, at the Constitution Center in Philadelphia, Attorney General Kathleen Kane contracted Doug Gansler (former Maryland Attorney General) to conduct an investigation of all OAG email. Gansler, acting as investigator, has no obligations under Rule 1.6.

Where Kane is prevented from disclosure of privileged information concerning OAG staff, Special Attorney General Gansler is not prevented from revealing information which could be otherwise considered privileged.

For example,… Any emails between OAG staffers could indicate a conspiracy to undermine and impeach Kathleen Kane. Where an improperly enacted and unconstitutional Rule 1.6 prevents Kane from publicly prosecuting OAG staff for corruption and abuses, it would not prevent termination and removal from the OAG.

The federal litigation regarding their terminations and purported retaliatory allegations could similarly ONLY be addressed by Kane when presenting a defense in a courtroom.

In July 2016, ending the law suits at an early stage, Federal District Judge Harvey Bartle III dismissed suits filed against AG Kathleen Kane by Frank Fina, Marc Costanza, Frank Noonan, Richard Sheetz and Randy Feathers.

This week, charges could be dropped by the Montgomery County District Attorney to prevents disclosure of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 by Kane. HOWEVER, A very likely element of Kane’s defense, the report prepared by Special Attorney General Doug Gansler could be released to State Police for investigation, review and prosecution.

The State Police are not hindered by any Rule 1.6 non-disclosure and are not prevented from prosecuting corruption or abuse of power which could be indicated in the report. In the past, PA State Police refused to participate in the InterBranch Report regarding The Kids for Cash scandal and likewise did not contribute to the Sandusky Report. Both reports were prepared by lawyers with mandates to conceal privileged information. Relevant Data from the State Police would not be included in the report where the lawyers involved had obligations of confidentiality.

PA State Police exposure and prosecution would provide the lawful opportunity for the law enforcement to address the Confidentiality problem responsible for American Injustice Ignored and the Constitutional Crisis in the US.

The US Constitution will be rebooted.

JUSTICE IS COMING.