A Terroristic Divorce

On October 27, 2015, the issues surrounding a letter were raised to the attention of the Superior Court and the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. PDF Notice/Letter

There has been no response, or reaction.

On November 9, 2015, the issues surrounding ANOTHER letter were raised to the attention of the superior Court and the the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. PDF Notice/Letter

There has been no response, or reaction.

Were these letters actually written and sent by Judge William Carpenter to the Superior Court Prothonotary?
– signatures are ARTWORK, not an original signature
– Letterhead seems to be authentic
– Envelope seems to be authentic
– Judge Carpenter has not indicated his responsibility for the letters.
– The first letter attempts to have the Deputy Prothonotary quash an Appeal to the Superior Court.
– Judge Carpenter had given permission for the Appeal to proceed.
– The Rules of Appellate Procedure do NOT provide for letters from judges to obstruct or interfere with an Appeal. As such, the letter is improper, unethical and where seeking to undermine, obstruct or interfere with the administration of justice.
– The letter was sent to me AND to the Deputy Prothonotary of the Superior Court.
– The second letter incorrectly indicates or suggests the reason for the filing of a second Appeal to The Superior Court.
– The Superior Court has not acted in response to the letter, although there have been a series of unsigned, undated and unsubstantiated Per Curiam orders issued seeking to dismiss the Appeals.

Those orders are addressed in MOTIONS in the following documents:
REGARDING THE PER CURIAM ORDER filed December 8, 2015
REGARDING THE PER CURIAM ORDER filed December 9, 2015
REGARDING THE PER CURIAM ORDER filed December 9, 2015 – B
REGARDING THE PER CURIAM ORDER filed December 9, 2015 – C

QUESTIONS:

1) Does Judge William Carpenter admit responsibility for the letters?
– What is his motivation for the bold and deliberate breach of ethics, procedure, law and constitution?

2) Are the documents forgeries?
– Intimidation? Coercion? Extortion?
– The failure of the judge to clarify or indicate responsibility suggests forgery.
– An attempt to introduce further chaos into a criminal case initiated to intimidate, harass and prevent any recourse for justice.

3) There has been no response from the District Attorney, the Assistant District Attorney or their staff.

4) Where the Assistant District Attorney is a ‘client’ of the District Attorney, is the District Attorney mandated to nondisclosure of the any involvement of the District Attorneys Office?
– The District Attorney has ignored the COMPLETE denial of the rights of the Defendant.
– The District Attorney has NEGLECTED to investigate the coercion of a waiver of arraignment under duress and the direct threat of arrest/incarceration. The complaint was dismissed after the allegation was denied by Court Administration (Privileged clients of the DA). A statement filed concurrently with the coerced waiver clearly indicated the necessity of an Arraignment.
– The District Attorney has neglected to address the failure of her office to follow ANY Rule of Criminal Procedure. THIS IS NOT AN EXAGGERATION.
– The District Attorney, and her staff, have failed to respond to inquiries, statements, phone calls, etc…

The facts suggest that someone within the District Attorneys office has created and mailed the forged letters to myself and the Superior Court. They are protected from prosecution where the District Attorney does not prosecute the corruption and crimes within her own office.

The failure of the District Attorney to take action indicates participation in a conspiracy to undermine the independence of the judiciary, coerce decisions in the matters before the court, and a determination to elicit an outcome without basis in fact or substantiated by law.

AND THEN, there are all of the other documents which have been electronically signed, Some mailed, some not mailed. Not served, not provided, not docketed. This would suggest that Judge William Carpenter has only signed TWO orders in this matter. Only two NON-FORGERIES. The first is the subject of the initial appeal which seeks to require the Judge to produce a statement of jurisdiction where jurisdiction is defective, lacking and void because of the deliberate and absolute disregard for the Rule of Law, Rules of Criminal Procedure and the US Constitution, to name a few.

SO I ASK… AFTER 10 YEARS OF TERROR, HARASSMENT, INVESTIGATION and INJUSTICE, WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE ARREST RISA FERMAN BEFORE SHE HAS ME EXECUTED?