A Terroristic Divorce

I HAVE REVIEWED THE PAPERWORK WHICH WAS RELEASED.

PA Supreme Court Order Suspending Kathleen Kane’s Law License (pdf)

THERE ARE SEVERAL INDICATORS WHICH SUGGEST THAT RULE 1.6 MAY BE SILENTLY CONCEALING A FRAUD.  Lapses in logic. I am not a lawyer, SO I may point them out.

KATHLEEN KANE IS HAVING HER LAW LICENSE SUSPENDED YET SHE GETS TO KEEP HER JOB ACCORDING TO THE ‘ORDER’.

THERE IS NO JUDGE’S SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.  

THERE ARE NO SIGNATURES ON THE ORDER AT ALL.
– No list of any affirming or dissenting Justices by name.

One might consider that the PER CURIAM order could be a farce drafted by lawyers whose improper actions are concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

Per Curiam Orders are most often issued without judicial review.  They are for housekeeping issues, scheduling issues, and standardized responses which are intended to address simple issues before the matter is presented to the judiciary for review.

A reasonable person might expect the suspension of the law license of the State Attorney General would merit judicial review and signatures.

A reasonable person might consider that where this Per Curiam Order further modifies THE COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY ACT which was passed by an elected Legislature and signed by an elected Governor, the Judicial branch is overreaching and usurping the authority of the Legislative and Executive branches.

A reasonable person might notice that THERE IS NO REAL DIRECT EVIDENCE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OR INVOLVEMENT.Perhaps it is NOT the judiciary that is overreaching their authority.

Have the lawyers working within the Judicial system exposed their ability to usurp the Judicial branch while silencing the Executive and Legislative? Rule 1.6 would mandate nondisclosure by lawyers, and permit fraud in the furtherance to conceal their corruption.

Claims in the media report it was a unanimous Supreme Court of Pennsylvania who issued the order. The documents provided do not support that suggestion.

The documents clearly indicate that a group of lawyers on the Disciplinary Board ignored the facts and based their request for suspension on implications, inferences and broad speculation while aware that there has been no judicial review of the case (a hearing) or any conviction.

Rule 1.6 would conceal the fraud. Rule 1.6 would prevent lawyers from inquiring or exposing the fraud. Intimidation would also apply to any lawyers who would be exposing the corruption within the very system which disciplines and controls those in the legal profession… and their disciplinary meetings are handled CONFIDENTIALLY.

THAT IS ONLY PAGE ONE! THERE WERE OVER 250 PAGES PROVIDED.

Oddly, there have been no statements issued from Justices on the PA Supreme Court regarding “their” decision.

Where the Per Curiam Order has all of the attributes of a forgery, a fraud and a farce… Yet, pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality, Lawyers cannot point that out.  Kathleen Kane could expose it, BUT ONLY WHEN SHE IS PRESENTING HER DEFENSE TO THE COURT. 

I suspect that if the Senate removes Kathleen Kane from her elected office before her trial, the Montgomery County District Attorney might suggest that Kane has paid the price for her alleged crimes and drop the charges.  THUS, PREVENTING KATHLEEN KANE FROM ANY DEFENSE, ANY DISCLOSURE, ANY RECOURSE.

As an attorney, Kathleen Kane must maintain Rule 1.6 confidentiality unless defending herself… even where the nondisclosure relates to the unconstitutional Confidentiality law. You may recall that there were two secret orders from unidentified courts which CONFIDENTIALLY ordered Kathleen Kane, the individual, to neglect the responsibilities of her elected office. Those responsibilities include actions in cases where constitutional issues arise.

In Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller, the Superior Court has not provided documents in the matter, AND KATHLEEN KANE HAD NEGLECTED HER RESPONSIBILTIES AS ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT EXPLANATION.

It was stated early on by the Attorney General that the corruption was larger than anticipated, that it went deeper, and it was fighting back.

NOT ABOVE DIRTY TRICKS: Former Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor’s New Year’s Manifesto. Commissioner Bruce Castor “schooled in how to really hurt you” and “to [screw] others”

Once affected by unconstitutional Rule 1.6, the victim has no protection of the law; all constitutionally protected rights are ignored and denied; and there is no opportunity for recourse or restoration of rights or protection of law.  Ever.

Seriously.  No escape ever. 

The judiciary have lost independence. They are held hostage to their own improperly enacted Confidentiality law. Rule 1.6.  The author controls the entire US state and federal judiciary held hostage.

Where the mandate of nondisclosure became law, corruption within law enforcement became concealed by broad Confidentiality and by the more narrow Attorney Client Privilege.

As Attorney General, Kathleen Kane’s clients include the Governor who once ran the perverted OAG, the staff of the OAG who have falsely accused her, and the District Attorneys who are prosecuting her.  The lawyers know they may falsely accuse while Kane is not permitted to disclose the truth to defend herself… Until that opportunity arrives, she must protect the clients.

You may have noticed the carefully choreographed dance around releasing the porn emails.  As the Attorney for the pervey emailers, Kane could not ask for the release of the emails directly.  And while she couldn’t prosecute her accusers, she could fire them to prevent their further sabotage of cases and investigations.  So, she did. 

By the improperly enacted collaterally unconstitutional Rule 1.6 mandate, Kane may not break her silence unless she is defending herself before the Court.

This is why the trial is taking place in the media with misinformation.  Kane indicated early on that THE CORRUPTION WAS HUGE… AND IT WAS FIGHTING BACK.

Confidentiality may also be breached in the case of a threat of a person’s death. In this instance, the Governor is already looking into why the prisoners on death row are living out their lives there. With no threat of death, the injustice which placed them on death row may be held confidential.

The judges have not become so politicized to be politicians. Many statements about political judges and campaign funding are designed to distract.

The author of Rule 1.6, and the Rules of Professional Conduct is the American Bar Association with affiliated associations in every major jurisdiction of state and federal court. When the lawyers in the clerks offices may intercept and interfere, it is concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality. They further avoid prosecution because of the mandate of silence. 

“Out of bad habit these blind fools spend their lives passing judgments contrary to what is right.”

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality has a built-in self defense which requires nondisclosure of the affect of Rule 1.6.  Ask any lawyer.  They have been trained NOT TO SEE IT. When they do, they will become silent. Rule 1.6 silent.

Where misdeeds of the clerks/lawyers undermine the rights of litigants which are presumed protected by the US Constitution, Rule 1.6 has a clear collateral unconstitutional affect on substantive rights. So, the Supreme Court lacked authority to enact the Rule into Law. (PA Const Article V Section 10 c provides conditional authority.)

BUT, as the courts are the self-appointed sole arbiters of what is Constitutional, you first must get past the lawyers in the clerks offices before any judge may review the issues to even consider issuing any mea culpa for the u constitutional law and the violation of the Public Trust.

The Legislature may suspend the law, BUT their leadership will not allow the issue to be presented.

As such, ONLY Governor Tom Wolf can call the Legislature to assemble to address the improperly enacted unconstitutional Confidentiality law.

To get to the Governor, you have to get through the Office Of General Counsel.  Where GC Jessica Diaz is aware of the unconstitutional aspects and affect, her efforts which have prevented any meeting with the Governor are a direct denial of constitutional rights… An act of TREASON for the purpose of continuing the ABA usurpation of judicial authority and undermining the rights of every American.

Rule 1.6 was improperly enacted in every state gradually from 1984 through 2009 at the urging of the American Bar Association – who had deliberately removed the fraud provisions from Rule 1.6.  The ABA knew exactly what they were doing.  Their members have profited from injustice.

I HAVE REVIEWED THE PAPERWORK WHICH WAS RELEASED.

PA Supreme Court Order Suspending Kathleen Kane’s Law License (pdf)

THERE ARE A FEW INDICATORS WHICH SUGGEST THAT RULE 1.6 MAY BE SILENTLY CONCEALING A FRAUD.. I am not a lawyer, SO I may point them out..

KATHLEEN KANE IS HAVING HER LAW LICENSE SUSPENDED YET GETTING TO KEEP HER JOB ACCORDING TO THE ‘ORDER’.

THERE IS NO JUDGE’S SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER. 
THERE ARE NO SIGNATURES ON THE ORDER AT ALL.
– No list of any affirming or dissenting Justices by name.

One might consider that the PER CURIAM order could be a farce drafted by lawyers whose improper actions are concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

Per Curiam Orders are most often issued without judicial review.  They are for housekeeping issues, scheduling issues, and standardized responses which are intended to address simple issues before the matter is presented to the judiciary for review.

One might expect the suspension of the law license of the State Attorney General would merit judicial review and signatures.

One might consider that where this Per Curiam Order further modifies THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ACT which was passed by an elected Legislature and signed by an elected Governor, the Judicial branch is overreaching and usurping the authority of the Legislative and Executive branches.

AND THAT IS ONLY PAGE ONE! THERE WERE OVER 250 PAGES PROVIDED.

Where the Per Curiam Order has all of the attributes of a forgery, a fraud and a farce… but pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality, Lawyers cannot point that out.  Kane could expose it, ONLY ONCE SHE IS PRESENTING HER DEFENSE IN COURT. 

I suspect that if the Senate would remove Kathleen Kane from her elected office before her trial, the Montgomery County District Attorney might suggest that Kane has paid the price for her alleged crime and drop the charges.  THUS, PREVENTING KATHLEEN KANE FROM ANY DEFENSE, ANY DISCLOSURE, ANY RECOURSE.

Once affected by unconstitutional Rule 1.6, the victim has no protection of the law; all constitutionally protected rights are ignored and denied; and there is no opportunity for recourse or restoration of rights or protection of law.  Ever.

Seriously.  No escape ever. 

Injustice within the courts which triggers confidentiality pursuant to Rule 1.6 can affect ANY litigant.  Even Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane.  The result is the loss of any protection of the law and where all constitutional rights are denied and ignored.

There is no recourse and no method to restore the litigant.  This is a deliberate collateral affect of Rule 1.6 silence.

As such, where Rule 1.6 affects the substantive rights of a litigant the Supreme Court of PA did NOT have authority to enact the law pursuant to Article V section 10 c.

Facts are disregarded.  Laws are simply ignored, improperly applied, or left unsubstantiated within the volumes of  misinformation in the court filings.

I have experienced the loss of protection of the law and my constitutitonal rights have been ignored since 2007.  There is no recovery.  The victims end up 1) Homeles/Destitute 2) Incarcerated or 3) Suicide.

Any and every criminal action against the litigant will be excused or ignored by law enforcement and the courts.  Every level of state and federal  law enforcement.  Every level of state and federal courts.

Taking Kane’s license is an action which is designed to prevent her from ever offering a defense. 

Should Kane be removed from office, the charges will be dropped and any  opportunity to present and demonstrate the affects of improperly enacted and unconstitutional  Rule 1.6 Confidentiality will be lost.

Other cases can demonstrate the matter, but cannot break the media blackout of the problem. The reason people seem to think the US Constitution is dead… is because it is being IGNORED pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

There are only two situations where Rule 1.6 Confidentiality is not mandated.  1) to prevent murder and 2) where a lawyer is defending themselves.

The hearings in May abruptly ended where the opportunity for Kane to present a defense had arrived.  Passing that issue to the District Attorney was a further delaying tactic.

…

In my case, EVEN WHERE THE CONSPIRACY TO PROVISION PLAN AND TRAIN FOR MY MURDER HAS BECOME CLEAR,  Lawyers in the Office of the Attorney General and/or the Montgomery County District Attorneys Office have remained silent.   Where the lawyers know the documented threat is a farce, it can be an effective intimidation tactic.

The problem remains where Attorney Client Privilege has the top law enforcement officers in the state and in the county doing NOTHING while the victim is denied any life, any joy, any future, and actions continue to intrude and prevent being secure.

The retailiation for surviving 9 years of injustice, while my life, family, friednships and career was annihilated is the continued abuse by false allegations.

MY ADVICE TO KATHLEEN KANE IS TO BREAK THE SILENCE BEFORE ITS TOO LATE.  BREAKING THE SILENCE WILL SHOW THE ACTIONS AGAINST HER ARE UNLAWFUL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  KANE KNOWS THIS TO BE TRUE… secret orders from unidentified courts confirm it.

If she breaks that secret, the American Justice System can be restored. The Constitution rebooted.  And people may again believe in liberty AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

The paperwork released recently provides the opportunity to review and compare manipulations pursuant to Rule 1.6.  This will be detailed in a future post in the coming days.

PA Supreme Court Order Suspending Kathleen Kane’s Law License (pdf)

I have lived through, survived, and continue to be victimized without any protection of the law and have had all constitutional rights ignored and denied since 2007. The ‘games’ they are playing are well documented on this web site. The media misinformation is such a deliberate massive distortion. It is clear that they are avoiding any mention of Attorney-Client Privilege, while it is at the center of everything.