A Terroristic Divorce

It would seem that no one in the Office of the Attorney General ever deserves to be fired. Perhaps that has been the story for the last 30 years or so… Something has changed!

When any staffer in the Attorney General’s office botches an investigation, whether deliberate or accidentally, Attorney General Kathleen Kane cannot prosecute them.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality mandates the AG prevent exposure of their crimes as the OAG staff are the clients of the Top Lawyer in the state.

They can complain all they like.  They can make things up. They can cause all kinds of events to sabotage the career of Kathleen Kane. They can undermine investigations and take actions which prevent the cases from being prosecuted. The damage they can cause while continuing to work in the OAG justifies their termination.

As a lawyer Kathleen Kane cannot expose the information, including misdeeds, of her clients.  Her clients include the Governor, the OAG, the OAG staff, other government agencies, etc.

Michael Miletto
William Davis Jr.
Frank G. Fina
Marc Costanzo
David Peifer
Bruce Beemer
Linda Dale Hoffa
Adrian R. King Jr
James Barker

These former employees of the OAG are clients of the Attorney General.  By law, Kane cannot disclose information about them without their permission.  They are free to say whatever they like.  They know Kane cannot do the same to them.

The leaked documents had redacted the names of any OAG staff, except Frank Fina and Marc Costanzo. 

Career Lawmen, Fina and Costanzo, know Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevents the Attorney General from speaking of them.  It seems a little bit self-serving that only their names were missed from redaction.  They lost positions of power and authority in the OAG when they left.  They lost more and would have an axe to grind against the AG.  They haven’t stopped their whining. Only logical, eh?

Fina and Costanzo failed to investigate any or my requests for intervention and complaints about corruption in Montgomery County. Alot of emails there. No porn. But likely in among the ballyhooed PORNgate emails are the volumes from people seeking law enforcement to address corruption

About the presentment,
1) Those headlines in The Daily News were conjecture, not fact.

2) The Grand Jury indicates there was no formal investigation of the OAG regarding the leak. 
BUT, IF THERE WAS… AS CLIENTS, KATHLEEN KANE COULD NOT SPEAK ABOUT IT.

3) “HAD TO COME FROM SOMEONE INSIDE.”
REMEBERING: The Mondesire investigation did result in someone in his organization being prosecuted.

4) A ‘disregard for any investigation’ could easily be confused with a MANDATE of CONFIDENTIALITY which prevented public discussion pursuant to Rule 1.6

5) The Attorney General attempted to stop the grand jury investigation? 
As a lawyer representing the Attorney General, the Office of the Attorney General, and the staff in the OAG… Kathleen Kane would know that any grand jury investigation would be futile where she is NOT PERMITTED by law to divulge any information about her former employees/clients.

Where Attorney General Kathleen Kane could not prosecute the crimes and misdemeanors within the OAG, SHE COULD PREVENT CONTINUING CORRUPTION BY FIRING THE OFFENDING EMPLOYEES.

APPARENTLY, NOT ONE PERSON IN THE OAG HAD SPOKEN ON BEHALF OF AG KANE TO THE GRAND JURY.
So simple… Kane was mandated to silence by Rule 1.6 – she could not inform anyone in her office of the investigation and how she was handling it. Silence can deceive.

BACK TO THOSE JERKS WHO HAVE THE NEWSMEDIA ON SPEED…
Lawyers… All of them. 
All familiar with Rule 1.6…
All informed that Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional
All aware that Rule 1.6 was improperly enacted by the Supreme Court of PA
All aware that they are permitted to lie with impunity while the Attorney General is mandated to silence.

Now read THE UNSEALED PRESENTMENT and notice how truth was twisted and contorted by neglecting to indicate a single factor which affects EVERYTHING…

The Presentment document has a single goal in mind. Attack the integrity of Kathleen Kane while she cannot speak or defend herself.

Rule 1.6 twists justice. The author, the American Bar Association, overthrew the judicial branch of government and then used its members in each major state and federal jurisdiction to create injustice… which would be ignored by Confidentiality.

The ABA violation of the Public Trust and their control of a judiciary without independence has been noticed by Americans in the unconstitutional actions of politicians. 

Rule 1.6 fell in September 2013.  The lawyers in the media have been quite effective in controlling the information provided to Americans.

Rule 1.6 prevents District Attorney Risa Ferman from prosecuting the corruption in the Montgomery OCunty Courthouse. Ferman isn’t ignoring the corruption. RISA FERMAN IS PARTICIPATING.

Risa Ferman is trying to make sure that corruption and injustice are permitted to undermine the courts into the future. She attacks Kathleen Kane to this end.

Risa Ferman isn’t an idiot. SHE JUST TOTALLY CORRUPT AND LIKES THINGS THAT WAY!

But, Kathleen Kane won’t speak about unconstitutional Rule 1.6. It is confidential until it is unconstitutional, then it never was a law to begin with.

We wait for Governor Tom Wolf to call the Legislature to Order to address the issue.
Only the Legislature has the authority to suspend a law.
The Judiciary that enacted it…. made it illegal for them to fix. Seriously.