A Terroristic Divorce

Rule 1.6 Injustice by Confidentiality – Case Analysis
– observations and tactics to expect when cases are affected by Rule 1.6 Injustice and Confidentiality
– where the following sentence applies, you are experiencing Rule 1.6 Injustice and the denial of every normal expectation of constitutional rights, protection of the law, freedom, life, liberty and ability for happiness.

“I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPS.”
– expected outcome 1) Homeless/Destitute, 2) Incarcerated, 3) Suicide
– there is currently no way out.
– Persevere. Justice is coming.

It is essential to remember – THE LOGIC IS TWISTED.

ACTIONS ARE BEING COMMITTED AGAINST THE VICTIM
TO MAINTAIN A GENERAL ILLUSION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
WHILE THE RIGHTS OF THE VICTIM ARE FURTHER IGNORED.

Everyone believes that they have constitutional rights up until the moment when they don’t. At that point, there is nothing anyone can or will do to address the loss of constitutionally protected rights. Protecting the illusion takes precedence over protecting your rights.

WHY? It would be simpler to protect your rights. That that would expose a corrupt judge and Rule 1.6 Confidentiality silences anything which would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers.

Rule 1.6 Injustice is triggered when a fraud occurs and the crime is endorsed by a judge. You will likely not be aware or informed of the event. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality will apply and it will begin to interfere immediately.

1.) Determining when your case has been affected is best identified by your experience.
– Intuition will suggest that something has gone wrong.
– The law will be ignored.
– Your rights will be ignored.
– Communication will become guarded.
– Questions will be ignored.
– People will act as if it is their first day on the job.
– Information will be unavailable.
– You will be called “crazy”.

2.) Determining the event which has occurred to cause the injustice is difficult. Everything associated with the event will be concealed by Confidentiality by everyone.
– You are seeking something which is being hidden from you.
– You may talk about it. “They” can not and will avoid the discussion.
– People will lie to your face.
– People are not comfortable telling lies.
– Seek information respectfully.
– These people are forced to lie to you.
– IT IS NOT PERSONAL.
– The feeling that people are talking about you or plotting is not imagined.
– You will be called “paranoid”.

3.) When you ask about something and are called “crazy” and “paranoid” at the same time, you are closing in on the trigger event. You may even have asked a direct question where a direct answer would expose the trigger event. The namecalling is a stall used when people feel cornered. An unjustified out of the blue insult.

– People will become nervous, very nervous, and fearful of repercussions for revealing the confidential information. Their fear is real. Nothing can be gained from applying pressure.
– IT IS NOT PERSONAL.
– They likely fear for their job if they blow it.
– This can be indicated by anger, unreasonableness, and a rude exit.

The County Ethics Policy also lack ethics. Mandating that county employees conceal information or face dismissal. The lack of any basis in ethics is consistent withe the lawyers minimal ethical standard which requires a lack of ethics, morality and integrity.

When the trigger event is inquired about, or raised in the court, it will be as if it was never said.

4.) Where the judge ignores a relevant event, breaches court procedure, denies reasonable discovery, neglects to consider an event or issue which has not been refuted – Remember the opposing lawyer is not permitted to discuss it. You have identified the event trigger. The judge is also participating in the Confidentiality.

5.) Where the judge begins a conference or proceeding by raising a topic for the first time, or sarcastically chastising you for asserting your rights, you can be assured that the judge has become directly involved in preventing the fraud from being exposed or addressed by others in law enforcement.

The judge IS protecting the perpetrator, concealing the fraud, and is directly and actively involved in the prevention and denial of your rights and any protection under the law.

The multiplicity of additional frauds should be expected. The earliest event is the true trigger.

6.) Where the lawyer wishes to involve the judge further in the scheme, the lawyer will fail to follow procedures, the law, court orders, etc. The judge will dismiss the neglect without sanction, and often just ignore the neglect.

Where these actions affect the jurisdiction of the court, the judge will ignore the lapse. A lawyer who fails to recognize that only one trigger is required, may manipulate the judge by further failures.

Errors in procedure which affect the jurisdiction of the court are ignored. Appeals are prevented. You have no rights. Confidentiality will prevent any subsequent judge from addressing the failure.

7.) When the lawyer has failed and the judge has excused without consequence, there is a fraud. The failure is being excuse because it points directly to a fraud event.

8.) A Challenge in court which exposes a CONFIDENTIALITY of Fraud will usually result in a spontaneous recusal of the judge.

9.) “That’s just crazy.” and “They can’t do that.” Every time you communicate with anyone (except a dumbass) and they say either phrase. Your experience is confirmed. Your rights and the law are being denied. Your response should be “BUT, THEY DID.”

REMEMBER: Identifying/Exposing the fraud event DOES NOT not change your situation.
Once the trigger event has occurred, there is no recovery, no relief, and no escape.
The resources available to undermine your life extend beyond any realistic comprehension.

10.) You are at risk. You can be terrorized and denied your rights and the protection of the law by anyone. By incorporating the ‘fraud’ of your case into a subsequent case, anyone is protected and permitted to commit frauds while reaping the benefits of Confidentiality.

11.) Identifying “They”. Once triggered, Confidentiality is system-wide – incorporating ALL lawyers, ALL judges, and ALL law enforcement. [ The “THEY” to whom the victims of injustice often refer. ]

“They” can include the direct employees of the lawyers, the judges and law enforcement.

The District Attorney, and the DA’s office, county detectives and the local police.

The District Attorney will not prosecute a crime against you where it could expose the Confidentiality effort.

Local Police will not take a report against a judge, reports of crimes committed against you will go no further than the District Attorney.

County Detectives will be instructed by the District Attorney to take no action on your behalf.

Every resource and service within the county can, and likely will, be used against you.

False reports to mental health departments may have people arrive at your door without any explanation of why they are there or who told them to ‘check on you’. Where they cannot provide any answer because of confidentiality, they will accuse you of paranoia. They only want to help. (Yet, they have no idea who you are or why they are at your door.) [Try to laugh. They are being used.]

Any Medical or Assistance Benefits you seek from the county or the state will be denied with directions that the denial may be appealed to the court.

False Reports to Police will be a regular occurrence. You will not be informed. The reports will indicate that “You are not to be informed because it would make you angry.” The reports will remain unsubstantiated and uninvestigated. Their primary function is for character assassination.

A long list of reports… you are not aware of them… the perception is that you are lying. The police do not care or want any explanation. The initial impression can not be adjusted. When you try to report a crime, the disrespect will begin as soon as that list is displayed.

Police will ignore any complaints indicating it is a civil matter and you must take it to the courts.
The inverse is NOT true though, the police will participate fully when called against you.

Communications between the judiciary and the police will be kept confidential where police may be instructed by the judge that crimes against you are endorsed, excused and ignored.

Private Investigators may be utilized to harass, antagonize or implicate you in criminal activity.

Reports of intrusive activities by private investigators using technology will not be investigated by any level of law enforcement.

The availability of intrusive technology to private investigators, local police, county detectives, and federal authorities permits the misuse of the technology at any time. A violation of your privacy and personal space which can be manipulated against you.

[ THE TECHNOLOGY INTRUSION – EDWARD SNOWDEN WAS NOT PERMITTED TO REVEAL. ]

Federal law enforcement authorities will not get involved unless the complaint/report is provided by an attorney.

Federal law enforcement authorities will not get involved where CONFIDENTIALITY efforts will be revealed by their actions.

The County District Attorney controls and coordinates all law enforcement activities within the county.

The news media who will not present any aspect of your experience, but will distribute suggestions, falsehoods, misinformation, disinformation, and unsubstantiated allegations against you when provided by the District Attorneys Office.

Your reputation can be attacked and discredited at any time without consequence.

---

YOU HAVE BEEN THE VICTIM OF A FRAUD. A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF RESOURCES ARE ENGAGED TO CONCEAL THAT FRAUD.

THE EFFORT TO PREVENT AND DENY JUSTICE IS REAL, BUT, IT IS NOT PERSONAL.
THE RESOURCES HAVE NOT BEEN DISPATCHED WITH THE INTENTION/PURPOSE OF DESTROYING YOUR LIFE.

THEIR PURPOSE IS TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TO CONCEAL THAT YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN IGNORED AND VIOLATED.

THEY WILL ACCOMPLISH THIS BY FURTHER IGNORING, DENYING, VIOLATING, PREVENTING AND INTERFERING WITH YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

---

This concept was confirmed by Representative Todd Stephens, formerly of the Montgomery County District Attorneys Office, member of the Judiciary Committee, when he indicated that a person does not have constitutional rights unless a judge decides that they have constitutional rights.

He’s WRONG. Every American has rights which are protected and secured by the US Constitution.

But, in practice, Todd Stephens has succinctly indicated exactly what has occurred.

A judge has concealed a fraud in a matter before the court. CONFIDENTIALITY was triggered.

A judge has made a decision which has denied a litigant of their rights. The litigant has no rights, or protections… and no one can or will address the situation within state or federal government.

A judge has the unconstitutional ability to effectively deny a citizen of their rights, their life and their freedom… and their hope. There is no allowance or opportunity for redress or rebuttal.

An absolutely inconceivable notion. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT – which utilizes an unconstitutional law to mandate efforts AGAINST the victim … AGAINST THE VICTIM. THE VICTIM GETS DESTROYED. While ‘THEY’ hide behind a terroristic unconstitutional aggressively enforced confidentiality.

---

In August 2007, Judge Rhonda Lee Daniele issued a secret court order – I’ve never met, seen or stood before her bench. Yet, that event caused the denial of every constitutional right and prevented protection of the law, harassing and terrorizing every moment of my life since, and preventing any possible future.

It took three years, August 2010, everyone involved lied, until one day the divorce clerk handed me a folder that contained a one page court order as had been described by police used to effect the robbery of my home in violation of multiple court orders by 20 people with 12 trucks and vehicles. Never prosecuted by the DA. Where the judge had called police to tell them to ignore it. Where the judge had refused to permit me to read the document shown to him in a proceeding, where everyone lied about the document’s existence, where it had NOT been docketed in the case; where it had not been distributed in the case; an order which slandered me as a monster AND prevented any contact with my children; while there had been no hearing or opportunity to defend; where the divorce clerk was IMMEDIATELY not at work for the next few weeks and was paralyzed with fear upon seeing me; where every member of the courthouse was aware of what ‘they’ had done to him; where I documented the discovery in filings and judicial complaints which included a concern that the clerk had been fired for his inadvertent action; where his first words to me after were “I need my job”; where the conduct board IGNORED the complaints; where the case had already had more than 10 judges involved; where the judge again immediately recused without explanation; where all petitions filed by me were completely IGNORED until the most vile and corrupt Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio also serving as President of the Montgomery County Bar Association who’s illegal and unlawful documented actions against the VICTIM were unconscionable and destructive.

For my daring to survive, Carluccio went FULL FORCE FOR THE SUICIDE – making me homeless, illegally selling my home (involving an innocent family – that case affected by the fraud involved in the sale); denying any financial compensation; throwing out EVERY personal belonging from my lifetime; corruptly ordering the court staff to NOT PROCESS and prevent any proceedings or appeals where her defective and void orders had violated established Pennsylvania Law.

(Appeals to Superior Court would cleanly expose the federal unconstitutional aspects within the court record. When this occurred 3 judges later, in July 2013, it was the efforts which prevented the appeal that exposed that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality – the needle in the haystack of injustice.)

AND, it still continues presently.

Judge Rhonda Lee Daniele: To conceal a crime committed by my wife’s lawyer, her former clerk… I should lose my life, be terrorized and denied any opportunity for a future,

The victim who dared to survive – and document the experience – who discovered the systemic problem in American Justice and Law Enforcement that targets and destroys innocent people. Where an the act of fraud at the whim of a judge unleashes the full resources of government TO KEEP CONFIDENTIAL THE JUDGE’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL DENIAL OF RIGHTS at any and every cost… and to threaten any politician who dares to become involved.

What has become of America? A victim is terrorized. A machine built to destroy lives. Lawyer manipulated Confidentiality out of control.

Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL… RULE 1.6 IS EVIL.. JUSTICE IS COMING.

“The Model Rules serve to advance the duty of preserving a client’s confidences at the expense of those injured by a fraud by the client.” – American Bar Association

Without regard for the victim, Confidentiality is applicable to lawyer-client fraud.
Confidentiality is system-wide – incorporating ALL lawyers, ALL judges, and ALL law enforcement.
[ The “THEY” to whom the victims of injustice often refer. ]

This Confidentiality has no support in ethics, morality or law. A repugnant failure in logic, morality and ethics, this practice could never become a proper law under the US Constitution… unless lawyers, judges and law enforcement ignored the lawlessness and their professional oaths. This is exactly what they did.

In 1983, the American Bar Association knew that their Model Rules were unconstitutional. Yet, the ABA proceeded to every state supreme court misrepresenting the Model Rules as a code of ethical conduct to be enacted into law.

The Rules of Professional Conduct recognize that a lawyer/client may commit a fraud and take advantage of the lawyers services in the commission of the crime.

CONFIDENTIALITY EXTRAPOLATED: A client could manipulate their lawyer to participate in a fraud, and A lawyer could manipulate their client to participate in a fraud. and A lawyer could manipulate the judge to participate in a fraud. Confidentiality prevents disclosure to the victim. Confidentiality requires obstruction by ALL lawyers, ALL judges and ALL law enforcement. – Unified AGAINST the victim of a fraud. Confidentiality extends to and encourages further frauds against the victim. This ‘Confidentiality’ has no support in Ethics, Morality or Law. Permission to undermine integrity and obstruct justice remains WRONG, even when concealed in a professional code, an ethics policy or a law.

The scenario is presented sincerely and without unnecessary suggestions or broad aspersions to the integrity of the judiciary.

The problem is a systemic mandate for participation AGAINST the victim.
All available personnel and resources can be utilized towards the efforts to maintain Confidentiality.
The victim is denied and prevented information preventing redress or resolution of the fraud.
The victim is further exposed for future acts of fraud equally protected under confidentiality.
The victim is prevented from any justice.
The victim is prevented from life, liberty and happiness.
The victim is prevented from any escape.

Where the judiciary has been manipulated, the judge is mandated to sacrifice their integrity to conceal their own involvement, or to conceal the involvement of prior judges.

Where a judge may take action to address the lawyer’s manipulation, Confidentiality prevents the lawyer’s client from being adversely affected, while permitting the victim to be further victimized.

Where the judge may report the lawyer for disciplinary action, Confidentiality creates a void around the situation which prevents the victim from presenting that evidence for appropriate consideration by the court, further denying justice, relief or protection of the law.

Where the disciplinary board may briefly suspend the lawyer, confidentiality prevents the victim from the information or any explanation while the courts neglect to schedule proceedings during the suspension.

Daily penalties, directly related to the litigation before the court, potentially accrue while the court fails to schedule the hearing until the suspension is served. Confidentiality of the complaint, any proceeding, and the decision is maintained while the victim is prevented from proceedings; denied explanation for the delay; and faces the daily multiplier applied to any penalty.

Confidentiality prevents the judge from any explanation for adjusting the accounting. The fraud is rewarded at the expense of the victim.

In Disciplinary Proceedings, where the lawyer admits guilt, the entire process and outcome is kept confidential. Rule 1.6 provides an incentive to commit fraud which will trigger Confidentiality and undermine the opponent.

The Confidentiality extends to every aspect of the case, the victim is further victimized in every instance.

Efforts to conceal ‘Confidential’ information from the victim expands to involve the court and courthouse staff in the deception and conspiracy in furtherance of the fraud.

The victim presents evidence and testimony. The lawyer neglects to address or counter the testimony where ‘confidentiality’ applies. In orders and opinions, the judge neglects to address ‘confidential information’ in Findings Of Fact or Considerations. Confidentiality leverages evidence and testimony to be ignored and not considered even when discovered and presented.

When the failure to address the testimony, evidence and rule of law is raised, the judge recuses without explanation. The judges integrity is sacrificed to participate in a fraud while the victim is denied redress, resolution or justice.

Under the Model Rules, the victim is denied the protection of the law, the state constitution and the US Constitution with no opportunity for resolution or escape from further incidents. The victim is prevented from justice by a system-wide conspiracy of Confidentiality initiated by a fraud. The fraud being unintentional, or deliberate, is inconsequential to the systemic affect on the victim.

In civil, criminal and family courts, a single act of fraud is all that is necessary to trigger a complete loss of rights, due process and protection of the law pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality from which there can be no escape.

The Model Rules collaterally deny, obstruct and prevent the constitutional rights of a litigant.

Not Constitutional, so it cannot be law.
Not Ethical, so it cannot be an ethics policy.
Not Moral, so it cannot be a moral principle.

Rule 1.6 Mandates Confidentiality where an unintentional, or deliberate, act of fraud committed by a lawyer or their client is ignored, excused and concealed while affecting the proceedings and undermining the authority and integrity of the judiciary which denies prevents and obstructs any just resolution and leaves a litigant exposed to future injustice by simple reference. Rule 1.6 is unethical, immoral, unconstitutional, repugnant, unlawful, dishonest, and contradicts the very nature and purpose of a judicial system.

As a Professional Code, the Confidentiality decision was at the discretion of the lawyer. Where that discretion may violate law, ethics, and morality, the discretion for the decision rested with the lawyer along with any liability and responsibility.

WHEN ENACTED INTO LAW, the Confidentiality became a MANDATE with the collateral effect including the loss of constitutional protections which denied redress or resolution within the courts; prevented prosecution of the fraud; and endorsed abuses of power under color of law by every level of state and federal law enforcement. No accountability. No liability. No responsibility. Leaving a litigant without basic human rights, civil rights, constitutional rights or hope.

Clearly affecting the substantive rights of a litigant, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania lacked the authority under PA Const Article V Section 10(c) to enact Rule 1.6 to law.

This unconstitutional law which has been improperly enacted must be addressed by the Pennsylvania Legislature which has the exclusive authority under PA Const Article I Section 12 to suspend the improperly enacted unconstitutional law.

The Model Rules have no basis in truth, morality, or ethics.
The Model Rules contradict the American values defined in the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution.

For all those years as a Code of Conduct, the Model Rules had included the fraud provisions which permitted disclosure.

In 1983, Removing the fraud provisions caused the Model Rules to become unethical, immoral, unlawful, inappropriate, unconstitutional and repugnant.

Rebranding unconstitutional Model Rules as an Ethics Standard to promote them to be improperly enacted into law, the American Bar Association exposes a sociopathic disrespect and contempt for the judiciary and abject malfeasance towards a nation who will be terrorized by their systemic perversion of justice.

Specifically, the needle in the ABA haystack of injustice, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information is a deliberate deception. On its face, Rule 1.6 indicates ALL MISCONDUCT MUST BE REPORTED to the proper authority. Upon application of cross references throughout the Model Rules, the requirement to report misconduct is entirely undone. Rule 1.6 was not titled “REPORT ALL MISCONDUCT”.

Lawyers are often accused of twisting words.
Unethical Ethics Standard???
Unconstitutional Law???
Professional Conduct???

There is no denying or excusing the result of the ABA’s efforts, their knowledge of the unconstitutional effect, the deliberate misrepresentations to the Judiciary, the sedition of their actions upon the state and federal governments, and the limits which they would exceed to conceal their crime against an entire nation.

At no time was the ABA protecting the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers as much as protecting the organization’s interests which usurped judicial authority through manipulative actions which perverted justice. The ABA shamed and corrupted state and federal judiciary and robbed it’s membership, and the legal profession, of integrity and honor.

Pretending that corruption was legal.

What the hell were they thinking?

Everyone participating in silence?

Persevere. Justice is Coming.

Every. Person. Matters.

Those lawyers who parrot that America has the ‘greatest judicial system in the world’ may only believe that because they were successful in stealing 40 million homes through foreclosure fraud while avoided any prosecution because of Confidentiality.