A Terroristic Divorce

American Bar Association
and ALL Affiliated Organizations
(PDF version)

This CEASE AND DESIST LETTER is to inform the officers of the American Bar Association and affiliated organizations at national, state and local levels, and their membership respectively to IMMEDIATELY STOP all operations and activities.

The organizations efforts which have written and promoted your Model Rules of Professional Conduct to be enacted into law in every state
– has caused a violation of constitutionally protected rights;
– has resulted in preventing law enforcement from actions to address the denial of constitutional rights;
– has undermined the integrity and the judicial independence of the courts at every level within the state courts, the federal district courts and the court of appeals
and has had similar impact hindering the government and ignoring the constitutional rights of Americans in every state.

In undermining the independence of the judiciary, your organization has committed an act of sedition which has been further compounded by manifest disregard for the law and due process. An aggressively enforced conspiracy of silence within your membership prevents exposure, redress and resolution by an affected judiciary which denies rights secured by the Constitution of the United States. The loss of judicial independence, an essential element of justice, compromises the integrity and jurisdiction of the courts.

As your activity which has resulted in the Model Rules of Professional Conduct being enacted into law affects my rights, I have the right to address this issue with your organization. I am currently engaged in efforts to address the indirect unconstitutional effect upon my rights including, but not limited to, contacting state and federal government representatives who may be members of your organization.

Additionally, I will explore legal remedies available to me. These remedies include, but are not limited to, contacting law enforcement to obtain criminal sanctions against you, and suing you civilly for damages which I have experienced. I am not under any circumstances waiving any legal rights I have presently, or future legal remedies against you by sending you this letter.

Sincerely,
Terance Healy
Todd Krautheim

DISTRIBUTION DIRECTLY TO:
American Bar Association
321 North Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60654-7598

American Bar Association
Suite 900
740 15th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-1022

American Immigration Lawyers Association
Suite 300
1331 G Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-3142

American Judicature Society
Center Building
2014 Broadway, Suite 100
Nashville, TN 37203

The American Law Institute
4025 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

The Association of American Law Schools
1614 20th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1001

Association of Life Insurance Counsel
14350 Mundy Drive
Suite 800, #258
Noblesville, IN 46060

Conference of Chief Justices (with copies sent to each Chief Justice)
Association and Conference Services
300 Newport Avenue
Williamsburg, VA 23185-4147

Energy Bar Association
2000 M Street, N.W.,
Suite 715
Washington, D.C. 20036

Federal Bar Association
1220 North Fillmore St.
Suite 444
Arlington, VA 22201

The Federal Circuit Bar Association
1620 I Street, NW
Suite 801
Washington DC 20006

Federal Communications Bar Association
1020 19th Street, NW
Suite 325
Washington, DC 20036-6101

Hispanic National Bar Association
1020 19th Street NW, Suite 505
Washington, D.C. 20036

Judge Advocates Association
In care of: The Army Navy Club
901 17th Street
Washington DC 20006

The Maritime Law Association of the United States
16855 Northchase Dr
Houston, TX 77060

National Asian Pacific American Bar Association
1612 K Street NW, Suite 1400
Washington, DC 20006

National Association of Attorneys General
2030 M STREET NW
8TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, DC 20036

National Association of Bar Executives
c/o ABA Division for Bar Services
321 N. Clark St., 16th Floor
Chicago, IL 60654

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
1660 L St. NW
12th Floor
Washington, DC 20036

National Association of Women Judges
1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 1138
Washington, D.C. 20036

National Association of Women Lawyers
American Bar Center MS 21.1
321 North Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60654

National Bar Association
1225 11th Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

National Conference of Bar Examiners
302 South Bedford Street
Madison, WI 53703-3622

The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws
111 N. Wabash Avenue
Suite 1010
Chicago, Illinois 60602

National Conference of Women’s Bar Associations
PO Box 82366
Portland, OR 97282

National District Attorneys Association
99 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 330
Alexandria, VA 22314

National Legal Aid & Defender Association
1901 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 20006

The National LGBT Bar Association
1301 K Street NW Suite 1100, East Tower
Washington, DC 20005

National Native American Bar Association
PO Box 11145
Tempe, AZ 85284

Alabama State Bar
415 Dexter Avenue
P.O. Box 671
Montgomery, AL 36104

Alaska Bar Association
550 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 1900
Suite 1900
P.O. Box 100279
Anchorage, AK 99510-2079

State Bar of Arizona
Suite 200
4201 N. 24th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85016-6288

Arkansas Bar Association
2224 Cottondale Lane
Little Rock, AR 72202

The State Bar Of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105

Colorado Bar Association
9th Floor
1900 Grant Street
Denver, CO 80203

Connecticut Bar Association
30 Bank Street
P.O. Box 350
New Britain, CT 06050-0350

Delaware State Bar Association
301 N. Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801

The District Of Columbia Bar
Suite 200
1101 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-3908

The Bar Association Of The District Of Columbia
Suite 101
1016 16th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036

The Florida Bar
P.O. Box 389
651 East Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

State Bar Of Georgia
Suite 100
104 Marietta Street, NW
Atlanta, GA 30303

Supreme Court of Guam
Second Floor, Guam Judicial Center
120 West O’Brien Drive
Hogatna, Guam 96910

Hawaii State Bar Association
Alakea Corporate Tower
1100 Alakea Street, Suite 1000
Honolulu, HI 96813

Idaho State Bar
P.O. Box 895
525 W. Jefferson Street
Boise, ID 83701

Illinois State Bar Association
Illinois Bar Center
424 S. Second Street
Springfield, IL 62701

Indiana State Bar Association
One Indiana Square, Suite 530
Indianapolis, IN 46204

The Iowa State Bar Association
625 East Court Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50309

Kansas Bar Association
1200 S.W. Harrison Street
P.O. Box 1037
Topeka, KS 66612

Kentucky Bar Association
514 West Main Street
Frankfort, KY 40601-1883

Louisiana State Bar Asssociation
601 St. Charles Avenue
New Orleans, LA 70130-3404

Maine State Bar Association
124 State Street
P.O. Box 788
Augusta, ME 04332-0788

Maryland State Bar Association, Inc.
520 W. Fayette Street
Baltimore, MD 21201

Massachusetts Bar Association
20 West Street
Boston, MA 02111-1218

State Bar Of Michigan
306 Townsend Street
Lansing, MI 48933-2083

Minnesota State Bar Association
Suite 380
600 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55402

The Mississippi Bar
643 N. State Street
P.O. Box 2168
Jackson, MS 39225-2168

The Missouri Bar
326 Monroe Street
P.O. Box 119
Jefferson City, MO 65101

State Bar Of Montana
Suite 2B
7 West Sixth Avenue
P.O. Box 577
Helena, MT 59624

Nebraska State Bar Association
635 S. 14th Street, 2nd Floor
Lincoln, NE 68508

State Bar Of Nevada
600 East Charleston Boulevard
Las Vegas, NV 89104

New Hampshire Bar Association
2 Pillsbury Street, Suite 300
Concord, NH 03301-3502

New Jersey State Bar Association
New Jersey Law Center
One Constitution Square
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1520

State Bar Of New Mexico
5121 Masthead, NE
P.O. Box 92860
Albuquerque, NM 87109

New York State Bar Association
One Elk Street
Albany, NY 12207

North Carolina State Bar
208 Fayetteville Street Mall
P.O. Box 25908
Raleigh, NC 27611

North Carolina Bar Association
P.O. Box 3688
Cary, NC 27519

State Bar Association Of North Dakota
P.O. Box 2136
Bismarck, ND 58502-2136

Commonwealth Of The Northern Mariana Islands Bar Association
P.O. Box 504539 C.K.
Saipan, MP 96950

Ohio State Bar Association
1700 Lake Shore Drive
P.O. Box 16562
Columbus, OH 43216-6562

Oklahoma Bar Association
1901 N. Lincoln (73105)
P.O. Box 53036
Oklahoma City, OK 73152-3036

Oregon State Bar
16037 S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road
Tigard, OR 97224

Pennsylvania Bar Association
100 South Street
P.O. Box 186
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0186

Puerto Rico Bar Association
Ponce de Leon Avenue
808 Stop II
P.O. Box 9021900
San Juan, PR 00902-1900

Rhode Island Bar Association
115 Cedar Street
Providence, RI 02903

South Carolina Bar
950 Taylor Street
P.O. Box 608
Columbia, SC 29202-0608

State Bar Of South Dakota
222 E. Capitol Avenue #3
Pierre, SD 57501-2596

Tennessee Bar Association
Tennessee Bar Center
221 Fourth Avenue, N., Suite 400
Nashville, TN 37219-2198

State Bar Of Texas
Suite 300
1414 Colorado Street
P.O. Box 12487
Austin, TX 78711-2487

Utah State Bar
645 S. 200 East, #310
Salt Lake City, UT 84111-3834

Vermont Bar Association
35-37 Court Street (05602)
P.O. Box 100
Montpelier, VT 05601-0100

Virgin Islands Bar Association
P.O. Box 4108
Christiansted, Saint Croix, VI USA 00822

Virginia State Bar
Suite 1500
707 E. Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219-2800

The Virginia Bar Association
701 E. Franklin Street. #1120
Richmond, VA 23219

Washington State Bar Association
Suite 600
1325 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101-2539

The West Virginia Bar Association
1111 6th Avenue
P.O. Box 2162
Huntington, WV 25701

West Virginia State Bar
2000 Deitrick Boulevard
Charleston, WV 25311

State Bar Of Wisconsin
5302 Eastpark Boulevard
P.O. Box 7158
Madison, WI 53718

Wyoming State Bar
4124 Laramie Street
P.O. Box 109
Cheyenne, WY 82003-0109

The following letter was sent to the Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Using the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice Report to demonstrate the failure within the ‘system’ to take responsibility for the Kids for Cash injustice and the failure to present the cause of the problem – Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

There have been filings with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania by which they were aware of our effort though dismissals by unsigned per curiam orders offer plausible deniability to their being informed. As petitions had been filed with the court, it would have been inappropriate to communicate with the judiciary at that time.

One persistent Question lingers…

WHY DID THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ENACT THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT INTO LAW?

What was the reason which necessitated their action? You may wonder why the supreme court in EVERY state did the same thing at staggered times from 1984 through 2009.

We have asked for a meeting where the issue can be discussed and those essential questions can be answered.

---

August 28, 2014

Chief Justice Ron Castille
Justice Max Baer
Justice Michael J. Eakin
Justice Seamus P. McCaffrey
Justice Thomas G. Saylor
Justice Correale F. Stevens
Justice Debra Todd
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Your Honor,

After meetings with Senator Chuck McIlhinney have failed to demonstrate any progress, it is clearly necessary to raise this issue to your attention directly.

The Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice was made up of lawyers (9 of 12) who heard information from county judges, district attorneys, public defenders and the Judicial Conduct Board. Attributing the blame to “silence, inaction, inexperience, ignorance, fear of retaliation, greed, ambition, carelessness.”, the lawyers on the commission maintained ‘confidentiality of information’ as required by law – Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Their realization was correct – “What good would [reporting] it do?” HOWEVER, the Commission’s report neglected to indicate the reason for the silence (Rule 1.6) and it also neglected to expose the cause (the Rule 1.6 mandate) , and as such their recommended reforms do nothing to prevent a recurrence of the judicial corruption.

Rule 1.6 mandates confidentiality of information where it adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary, the reputation of legal professionals, self-incriminates, or negatively affects their client. Protecting the integrity of a judicial which lacks integrity is foolishness. Mandating it has unconstitutional effects.

The Commission Report and Reform Recommendations amount to fraud – a deliberate effort to conceal the root cause of the failure of the justice system to address judicial misconduct, corruption and injustice.

Far more frightening and perilous, is that the lawyers associated with the Commission have now been ‘educated and trained’ in how to execute and conceal crimes such as those committed by Ciavarella and Conahan – who only went to prison because they had failed at money laundering.

The Supreme Court’s authority to enact law is limited to situations where ‘such rules are consistent with this Constitution [Pennsylvania] and neither abridge, enlarge or modify the substantive rights of any litigant.’

The Attorney General is the chief law enforcement officer in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who must follow the US Constitution, the Pennsylvania Constitution, and the Rules of Professional Conduct which were enacted by the Supreme Court.

For the Attorney General, the Rule 1.6 mandate of ‘confidentiality of information’ with regard to client information undermines ‘everything’ where an attorney general’s clients include (1) the public, (2) the Pennsylvania government, (3) the Office of the Attorney General, (4) government agencies and departments statewide, (5) personnel within those agencies and departments, (6) and themselves.

The Rules of Professional Conduct enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania have substantially affected the ‘jurisdiction’ of the Attorney General preventing and obstructing law enforcement responsibilities when it relates to judicial corruption and injustice within the courts.

The Supreme Court, by the same mandate, has caused a ‘lawful’ requirement within every court and by every lawyer in the commonwealth to ignore injustice and judicial corruption.

Previous Codes of Professional Responsibility (among other titles) have included similar guidelines, BUT once enacted into ‘law’ in 1987 ignoring injustice and judicial corruption ceased being discretionary and was MANDATED BY LAW.

The result, the Rules of Professional Conduct collaterally affect and negate ‘the substantive rights of the litigant’. Specifically, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality causes a mandatory conspiracy of silence within the courts which ignores the damage and harm caused to litigants and further hinders and prevents any resolution.

The substantive rights of the children and families of Luzerne County were clearly ignored.

The Supreme Court lacked authority to enact Rule 1.6 into law as the substantive rights of the People have been ‘abridged’, ‘modified’, denied and ignored.

Additionally, the role of the Sheriff as Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the county has been negated and minimized by judicial decisions. Constitutionally, the Sheriff has the lawful authority and resources to enforce the law within the county.

Failing to act because the judiciary has convinced them of a greatly diminished role, the non-lawyer Sheriffs (reluctantly) defer authority to the county District Attorney who must follow the Rules of Professional Conduct and Rule 1.6. A necessity to prevent prosecution. District Attorneys take no action to investigate and prosecute the injustice and judicial corruption. Related crimes against the victims of injustice are ignored leaving the litigant with no protection under the law.

The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct were rolled out to the states and enacted into law nationwide without the involvement of the state legislatures, the signature of the governors or any constitutional review.

“What is right is not always the same as what is legal.” was offered by Edward Snowden as an explanation for his actions revealing unconstitutional activity. This statement may also apply to the failure of attorneys general, judges, district attorneys and lawyers to address the unconstitutional actions made ‘legal’ which have undermined justice over the last 25 years.

It is the responsibility of the Governor to represent the People, to preserve, protect and defend the United States Constitution and the state Constitution, and to recognize that collaterally Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional to the People.

The act of sedition which enacted Rule 1.6 and mandated the silent participation of all legal professionals, perverted the judiciary, sacrificed the personal integrity of every judge, and undermined justice can no longer be ignored and excused because of the intimidation and threats of disciplinary action by the corrupt who have deliberately violated the public trust.

The Commission on Juvenile Justice have not done what was requested of them. They have participated in concealing the truth. They have endorsed and enabled continuing injustice.

You, the members of the Legislature and the Judiciary who assembled the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice must review their report findings and recommendations. The deliberate knowledgeable failure of those lawyers to indicate the root cause of the problem in Luzerne County, which also less publicly affects every court in the Commonwealth, was caused by Rule 1.6 – An unconstitutional and repugnant law which has been improperly enacted by the state Supreme Court without proper review of its affect on constitutional rights.

You attention to this matter of statewide importance is appreciated. A meeting to discuss the issue would be greatly appreciated.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim

PDF version
Attachment – Letters sent to other government officials

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation. These 25 rules are everywhere in media, politics, television shows, blog articles, and the hateful comments which often prevent discussion of an issue, and of course they are Facebook trolling tactics.

These are the tactics which have been experienced and used to ignore the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6.

Even when the issue is very clear and easily explained, these methods have been used to prevent discussion, interfere with communications, and misinform. I’ve experienced these tactics. More often than not exposing the disinformation tactic is the best way to counter. BUT, you must always be prepared for combinations of the tactics being used by teams.

When compiled into a list like this along with an issue, examples, facts and truths, the DISINFORMATION techniques are undeniable AND often are coordinated and systemically used by oprganizations.

---

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

by H. Michael Sweeney
copyright (c) 1997, 2000 All rights reserved
(Revised April 2000)

Affirmations help purify our thoughts and restructure the dynamic of our brains so that we truly recognize that nothing is impossible.

I use several affirmations throughout every day in speaking, writing, and Facebook posts — often when facing the continuing survival through the desperate moments that people are facing.

Less is more powerful…. when there is really nothing you can do or say to change the immediate circumstance, … when a friends just needs to be acknowledged in a desperate moment.

I keep ’em short and often use them to close a web post, Facebook post or email.

(There are some folks who notice when I haven’t used them… and they call it to my attention OR post themselves.)

JUSTICE IS COMING.

I PERSEVERE.

EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS.

PERSEVERE.

The volume of paperwork required to survive the corruption and injustice… to survive, to stay out of prison, to persevere… to not grant them the suicide which they seek.

Non-stop litigation since 2007. Over 20 judges. 3 undecided appeals. Every level of state court. federal district court and court of appeals. The US Congress contacted for intervention.

Direct communication with every law enforcement agency in the government – nationwide, Department of Justice and US Attorney within each and every state. Direct communication with every state representative and senator. Direct communication with every state Attorney General. ( <<< - - All in the last 3 weeks) Over 30 archive boxes of paperwork. Computers and phones hacked and intercepted. No end in sight. No explanations. No rule of law. No escape. This is one month of litigation.... Sometimes the Bitstrips are too accurate.

It is illegal for the lawyers and judiciary to expose that the judiciary has been undermined, lost their independence and sacrificed their integrity.

Senator Stewart Greenleaf and the Judiciary Committee
They won’t meet on this. (It is illegal for them to do so.)

The lawyers on the Judiciary Committee have caused covered up and perpetuated this national disgrace.

WHAT ARE YOU DOING?

THE PEOPLE WANT THEIR RIGHTS RESTORED.

The lawyers cannot restore what they destroyed.

The United States government existed for over 200 years WITHOUT Rule 1.6 corruption and injustice. It has no necessity and no justification in law, ethics, morality, humanity or justice. Enacted to conceal the corruption of those believed to be uncorruptable because the integrity of the judiciary is beyond reproach. Those without integrity have twisted the judicary and denied the US constitution.

---

Senator Greenleaf’s Profile on his web site indicates he has been in the Pennsylvania government since before Rule 1.6 promulgation into law. For over 30 years, Greenleaf has stood by and watched as people’s families and lives were destroyed.

He ignored me. For years. I begged and pleaded and cried. HE DID NOTHING. No wonder his Chief of Staff, Pat, is too ashamed to even face me.

I found the problem. HE WON’T MEET. ??? Stewart Greenleaf IS the problem. He is a coward who cannot even face the victims of his corruption.

Contact Senator Greenleaf

On Facebook Senator Stewart J. Greenleaf

Harrisburg Office Senate Box 203012 Harrisburg, PA 17120-3012 (717) 787-6599 800-848-5013 (717) 783-7328 Fax TTY: 800-364-1581	District Office 711 North York Road Suite 1 Willow Grove, PA 19090 (215) 657-7700 800-924-3300 (215) 657-1885 Fax

His listed awards are all self-serving awards from lawyers under duress and compelled to pay homage to the man who perverted the judicial branch and the legislature of the commonwealth for over 30 years.

Recognition of “his efforts and resolve in protecting the rights of Pennsylvanians under civil law” – Something only lawyers could recognize apparently. WHAT A TWISTED BIOGRAPHY OF EGO AND MISDIRECTION.

State Senator Stewart J. Greenleaf (R-Montgomery / Bucks) has represented Pennsylvania’s 12th Senate District since 1978. He was a member of the House of Representatives from 1977 to 1978, serving on the House Labor Relations and Judiciary Committees as well as the Subcommittee on Crime and Corrections. He also served as an Upper Moreland Township Commissioner, as an Assistant District Attorney, Chief of the Appeals Division for the Montgomery County District Attorney’s Office, and as an Assistant Public Defender in Bucks County. He is a member of the Bar Associations of Pennsylvania and Montgomery County. A native of Montgomery County, Senator Greenleaf is a lifelong resident of Upper Moreland Township. He is married to Cecelia “Kelly” Greenleaf. Having graduated from the University of Pennsylvania, he received his law degree from the University of Toledo School of Law. He is Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and is currently a member of the Senate committees on Appropriations, Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure, Education, and Finance. He is also Vice Chair of the Intergovernmental Operations Committee. He is a Senate appointed board member of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. He has served on the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing, the Task Force on Death Penalty Litigation in Pennsylvania, and the Statewide Steering Committee on Court Automation. He currently serves as chairman of the Joint State Government Commission’s Task Forces on Real Property Law; Decedents’ Estates Laws; Domestic Relations Law. As a member of the Commission on Judicial Reform, he participated in the development of recommendations to improve the process of judicial selection and was prime sponsor of constitutional amendment legislation to revise the state’s system of judicial discipline. He serves on the State/Federal Assembly of the Law and Justice Committee of the National Conference of State Legislatures and the Criminal Justice Task Force of the American Legislative Exchange Council. He is a board member of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. He was chairman of the Senate Impeachment Committee during the 1994 impeachment trial of former Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Rolf Larsen. He is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Commission for Justice Initiatives and Task Force on Student Loan Forgiveness and Repayment Assistance. The senator is the author of the Clean Indoor Air Act of 2008, Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law, the Grandparent Custody Law, the Rails to Trails Act, the School Pesticide Law, the Health Club Consumer Protection Act, the Puppy Lemon Law, the “No Means No” Rape Law, the Amusement Ride Inspection Act, the Missing Children Act, the Divorce Code Reform Act and the Divorce and Custody Mediation Act. He was also prime sponsor of a law that extends the period of legal recourse for abused children, the constitutional amendment allowing for the option of electronic testimony for child victims and witnesses, the law requiring tougher penalties for cruelty to domestic animals, and the law allowing extended sentences when baseball bats are used in violent criminal acts. As chairman of the Judiciary Committee, the senator conducted hearings on the corrections system in Pennsylvania and achieved passage of legislation to reduce overcrowding in state prisons and county jails through intermediate punishment programs. He is also sponsor of state sentencing reform legislation and of a law that provides for addiction treatment for eligible offenders. In 2010, the Senator passed his Criminal Justice Reform Act. He also conducted hearings on the state’s system of probation and parole, resulting in the enactment of public safety reforms in the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and in the Interstate Compact, which deals with interstate parole arrangements. In addition to his interest in criminal justice and judicial issues, Greenleaf has sponsored numerous consumer protection initiatives relating to telemarketing controls, octane level testing, the travel industry and the expansion of the Lemon Law to leased vehicles. The recipient of a number of honors, Greenleaf has been presented the 2005 Leadership Award of the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape; the 2002 Montgomery County Bar Foundation Milton O. Moss Award; the 2002 Clean Water Fund Leadership Award; the Pennsylvania Legal Services Ambassador for Justice Award, the Pennsylvania Credit Union League Keystone Award, the Montgomery County Bar Association Outstanding Service Award; the Vince Fitzpatrick Humanitarian Award, the Pennsylvania Legal Services Outstanding Leadership Award; the Fraternal Order of Police Award; the Matty Muir Award from the Victim Services Center of Montgomery County; the Montgomery County Association for Retarded Citizens President’s Award; the Conservation Legislator of the Year Award by the Pennsylvania Wildlife Federation; the National Federation of Independent Business Guardian of Small Business Award and the Humane Society of the United States Mid-Atlantic Region Humanitarian Award. He was selected Man of The Year by the Willow Grove Chamber of Commerce and the Ukrainian Educational and Cultural Center. He was chosen for the Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association 1992 Annual Award in recognition of his “efforts and resolve in protecting the rights of Pennsylvanians under civil law.” He has also received the B’nai B’rith Humanitarian Award, the North Penn Korean Association Community Award, the Boy Scouts of America Community Service Award, the Caroline Earle White Award of the Women’s SPCA, the Korean Senior Citizens Service Award, the Deputy Sheriffs Association Distinguished Public Service Award, and the Pennsylvania Legislative Animal Network’s Humane Legislator of the Year Award. Senator Greenleaf has most recently been presented with the William E. Zeiter Award from the Statutory Law Committee of the Pennsylvania Bar Institute for his efforts to update and consolidate Pennsylvania’s statutory law. Also, in 2008, the Senator was awarded a proclamation from the Pennsylvania Veterinary Medical Association and the University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine for the advancement of animal welfare issues, the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB) Guardian of Small Business award, and the Distinguished Alumnus of the Year Award from the University of Toledo College of Law, in recognition of his lifetime of legislative accomplishments.

August 26, 2014

Rep. Katherine M. Watson
Rep. Marguerite Quinn
Rep. Todd Stephens
Rep. Tina Davis
Rep. Scott Petri
Rep. John T. Galloway
Rep. Thomas Murt
Rep. Steven J. Santarsiero
Rep. Frank Farry
Rep. Paul Clymer
Rep. Gene DiGirolamo
Rep. Bernie O’Neill
Rep. Kate Harper
Sen. Bob Mensch
Sen. Robert Tomlinson
Sen. Charles McIlhinney
Sen. Stewart Greenleaf
Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick
Senator Bob Casey
Senator Pat Toomey

A package of information regarding the loss of constitutional rights and liberties caused by Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct has been delivered to your office, by hand, and by fax, with a request to meet to discuss the issue, and ways to address it.

We have been very fortunate to have had the opportunity to meet with members of your staff, or directly when your schedule has permitted. Those meetings have proven to be productive and informative.

As we are all located nearby to each other, we are proposing a meeting with everyone who is available. Please contact our office with 3 possible dates/times when you are available in the coming weeks and if you are interested in hosting the meeting at your office, another location, or our location in Doylestown.

Thank You for your attention to this very important issue.

Terance Healy
Todd Krautheim

---

A law enacted by the state supreme court in every state without proper construction, without constitutional review, without involvement of any state legislature and without the signature of any governor designed to ignore judicial corruption and injustice which includes an aggressively enforced MANDATE of silence for all lawyers while ignoring, denying and preventing the constitutional rights of litigants.

THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6

Rule 1.6 affects civil, criminal, family, federal district and federal appeals courts making it impossible to address the loss of constitutional rights when committed by a judge.

The Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandates confidentiality of client information where the information
– would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
– would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
– would expose individual liability,
– would adversely affect their client.

The Attorney General of Pennsylvania represents the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Governor, the Attorney General’s office, various branches of the government, their agencies and their officers and the public. All Clients.

This is why Kids for Cash was ignored by the Attorney General, the Luzerne County District Attorney, every lawyer in Luzerne county, the PA Supreme Court and the Judicial Conduct Board.

This is why the ‘Sandusky Report’ released in 2014 failed to indicate any improper conduct. The Report also failed to include a disclaimer that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality mandated the silence of the Attorney General regarding information about the Office of the Attorney General, the Governor, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, etc…

This is why millions of foreclosures were ignored by the Attorneys General nationwide with no prosecutions while millions of people lost their homes based on fraudulent and robosigned deeds and other documents.

Rule 1.6 has undermined law enforcement and the judicial branch in the states and federally.

---

Rule 1.6 is a core part of the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Most, if not all, rules point back to Rule 1.6 by cross reference.

The ABA presented their Model Rules to each state supreme court for promulgation into law. As trade rules, confidentiality was discretionary. As law, the confidentiality became an aggressively enforced mandate which denied people of constitutional rights and prevented anyone in law from acting on behalf of the victims against it’s unconstitutional effect. The victims having no protection of the law become 1) destitute/homeless, 2) incarcerated, or 3) suicidal.

RULE 1.6 CAUSES AN INESCAPABLE LOSS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
WHICH UNDERMINES THE STATE AND FEDERAL JUDICIARY.

PDF version
Fax’d 8/26/2014 11:25 AM – 1:13 PM

A law enacted by the state supreme court in every state without proper construction, without constitutional review, without involvement of any state legislature and without the signature of any governor designed to ignore judicial corruption and injustice which includes an aggressively enforced MANDATE of silence for all lawyers while ignoring, denying and preventing the constitutional rights of litigants.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

Rule 1.6 affects civil, criminal, family, federal district and federal appeals courts making it impossible to address the loss of constitutional rights when committed by a judge.

The Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 1.6
CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandates confidentiality of client information where the information
– would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
– would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
– would expose individual liability,
– would adversely affect their client.

The Attorney General of Pennsylvania represents the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Governor, the Attorney General’s office, various branches of the government, their agencies and their officers and the public. Clients.

This is why Kids for Cash was ignored by the Attorney General, the Luzerne County District Attorney, and every lawyer in Luzerne county.

This is why the Sandusky Report released in 2014 failed to indicate any improper conduct. The Report also failed to include a disclaimer that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality mandated the silence of the Attorney General regarding information about the Office of the Attorney General, the Governor, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, etc…

This is why millions of foreclosures were ignored by the Attorneys General nationwide with no prosecutions while millions of people lost their homes based on fraudulent and robo-signed deeds and other documents.

Rule 1.6 has undermined law enforcement and the judicial branch in the states and federally.

---

Rule 1.6 is a core part of the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct. All rules point back to Rule 1.6 by cross reference.

The ABA presented the Rules to each state supreme court for promulgation into law. The American Bar Association took their trade laws which were discretionary and the supreme courts turned them into lawful mandates. Aggressively enforced mandates which denied people’s constitutional rights. BUT, the silence prevented anyone in law from acting on behalf of the victim of the loss of their constitutional rights.

Rule 1.6 causes an inescapable loss of constitutional rights.

August 22, 2104

U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorneys

RE: Your letter dated August 19, 2014 (Attached)

A package was hand delivered to the Philadelphia US Attorney’s office and we asked for a meeting. The attached response is inappropriate, unsigned, on questionable letterhead and completely neglects the issue to be discussed.

The game of making certain there is no way to know to whom we should follow up is tiresome. Why is the United States Attorney playing with people asking for help? And why is the issue no longer the relevant one, but the impossibility of meeting to discuss a federal crime?

Your reply indicates that that the US Attorney “is responsible for the prosecution of persons accused of violating federal laws”. The Constitution of the United States is a federal law. Rights secured by the constitution have been violated, personally and to millions across the nation.

The Pennsylvania Judiciary has violated the Constitution of the United States leaving the courts undermined by a rule enacted by the state supreme court which additionally violates the Pennsylvania Constitution. The same rule undermines the federal courts. The package of letters provided exposed this issue with clear examples.

If your office is also following the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and as lawyers you are obligated to conceal the crime because it adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary, then indicate that truth and recognize it as the problem to be addressed.

Acknowledge the mandate requiring all lawyers to ignore judicial corruption and injustice, and acknowledge that the judicial branch of state and federal government has been undermined by one rule put forth by the American Bar Association which has undermined the United States Constitution in every court in the country.

The Department of Justice indicates the US Attorney is the appropriate contact.

A meeting is requested to discuss the issue and the criminal actions which have occurred to prevent exposure and resolution of this national issue.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd Krautheim

( PDF version )

Your lawyer is bragging about the injustice of the Weilheimer decision. Seriously?

How laughable that a lawyer in a large Philadelphia law firm records his 2014 successes – TWO – and the one entry is based on corruption and fraud with no support in law and an appeal is pending.

Your lawyer wasn’t representing the Millers.* The Millers didn’t even bother to show up. If the Millers had shown up maybe they could explain that “Weilheimer for Judge” sign on the lawn? Judge Weilheimer couldn’t explain it.* Are we supposed to believe that in a local election, people believe so much in a candidate that they do not know and have never met that they seek out and obtain a sign supporting their election?

The lawyer failed to address the essential issue.** The lack of jurisdiction of the order they were seeking to enforce.** No mention of anything which supported jurisdiction in the entire transcript.** Yet the lack of jurisdiction was proven beyond any doubt on the court record… AND COMPLETELY IGNORED BY JUDGE WEILHEIMER.***

In the Appeal, Judge Weilheimer delayed 5 months in issuing her opinion. Justice delayed is justice denied. In her opinion she neglects to offer any support for the jurisdiction of the defective and void order.***

YET, THE LAWYER IS BRAGGING ABOUT THIS ‘WIN’ ON THE COMPANY WEB SITE. The lawyer who neglected to reveal that his client was Genuine Title Company.**** He never met the Defendants.

Bragging about the deliberate infliction of injustice. A big win – still pending appeal. A pathetic display of arrogance in the face of judicial corruption and injustice. Keeping a man homeless and destitute for a prolonged period while trying to regain his rightful property after enduring constant litigation since 2007.

* Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of client identity
** Rule 1.6 – Do not adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary
*** Rule 1.6 – Do not self incriminate. Do not adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary.
**** Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of client identity

Ejectment Action Against Homeowners Dismissed – April 9, 2014

Is this posted on your mother’s fridge?