A Terroristic Divorce

In December 2013, during a meeting with Senator McIlhenny, he was asked to notify the Pennsylvania Legislature of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

We have met with the Senator and his Chief of Staff on several occasions. They have been informed of the necessity of the challenge and the circumstances of the loss of constitutional rights.

As a non-lawyer, Senator McIlhenny may lawfully take action in this matter. He is NOT prevented by the Rules of Professional Conduct which prevent any lawyer from acting in this regard.

We drop by his office in Doylestown to follow up on a regular basis.

BUT, SENATOR McILHENNY HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING YET.

It’s been 6 months. THAT is unacceptable.

Have the lawyers in the Senate told Senator McIlhenny to STFU?

Senator Robert Casey, Jr.
Senator Pat Toomey

Re: The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

Repeated efforts to meet on this topic have been ignored.

This national issue requires your attention and the attention of the United States Congress.

The Third Circuit Court has been formally requested to notify the United States Congress and to provide Certiori to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Please review the following documents and share them with the US Congress.

It is requested that you immediately notify President Barack Obama of this matter.

Please contact us regarding scheduling of a meeting so that the matter can be lawfully and properly addressed within the United States Congress. ( Your email, and web based forms have not been successful in maintaining any contact. )

This Cover
+ Notice of Challenge to Constitutionality of Statute (5 pages)
+ Motion for Reconsideration (10 pages)

Additional information and documents filed within the Pennsylvania Courts, the Eastern District Court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals can be found at www.work2bdone.com/live
Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim

We are not being obstinate, and have requested a true, correct and independent review of the facts of the matter and application of appropriate law and doctrine.

However, the Court has demonstrated that it is determined to ignore the facts and to permit their decision to rest on the incorrect information.

All requests by the Appellants to present the matter to the court or to answer the questions of the court have been denied.

INJUSTICE does not end injustice. It extends it.

JUSTICE IS COMING.