03.17
Appeal to
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
from the Order and Memorandum entered in
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
on the 29th day of October. 2013
Plaintiffs Terance Healy and Todd M. Krautheim filed this Constitutional Challenge on August 8, 2013 and served it upon Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane and the Attorneys General of the United States challenging the Constitutionality of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Plaintiffs are seeking to restore their constitutional rights; restore the integrity and reputation of the judiciary and the legal profession; and to return to the legislature the ability to perform the duties of their position to responsibly manage the law.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Case and Controversy before the Court
Article III Requirements are met
Article V Section 10 (c) of the Pennsylvania Constitution
Article V – The Attorney General
Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of Information
Jurisdiction for the Constitutional Question
The Controversy Before The Court – Summary Of Argument
Attorney General Kathleen Kane’s DOMA Decision
No Comment.
Add Your Comment