A Terroristic Divorce

I have filed a claim for personal property loss with Liberty Mutual Insurance.

The following pictures document the dissipation and disposal of the assets by Sonya Healy and do not respresent the full extent of the property loss.

These pictures are from September 4, 2011:

These pictures are from August 28, 2011:

A Letter to Liberty Mutual explaining the circumstances:

My concerns lie primarily with the claims having been submitted in my name. The one document I have seen indicates incorrectly that I alone an the Insured, the Claimant and that Payment was made to me.

I had been ordered to endorse several checks from Liberty Mutual in court on July 18, 2011. I did this under duress and only when threatened with contempt and Ordered to endorse the checks by Judge Carolyn Carluccio. My request to obtain copies of the claims was ignored. I disavow any participation in any claim filed with Liberty Mutual. They were all filed by Sonya Healy without my knowledge or consent.

Sonya Healy obtained control of the house on June 9, 2011 through a court order. I had lived at the home alone since she abandoned the house in May 2007.

The Court Order is defective and an appeal had been filed. Judge Carolyn Carluccio continues to fail to take the appropriate action to permit the appeal to proceed to the Superior Court. As such, I will be filing with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to request that she be removed from the case and the appropriate hearings held to permit the appeal.

I assure you that I am not contacting you out of malice or anger towards my ex-wife. Every action by Sonya Healy and her attorneys since 2007 has involved misrepresentation and fraud.

In March 2008, I had filed a claim with Liberty Mutual for the damages when my wife, and a team of 20 people, using 12 suv’s and trucks, violated several court orders when they burglarized and vandalized the home and poisoned my dog. When police were called by neighbors, she presented a false court order written by her attorneys and the police permitted the robbery to continue. She was later found in contempt and orderd to return the items.

In September 2011, they neglected to inform the title company about the appeal. They were able to manipulate the fraudulent transfer of the deed to my house using a defective and expired power of attorney which was not properly executed or notarized.

I was prevented from obtaining any information about the entire sale process. The Real Estate agent, her manager and their attorney had been mislead into the belief that Court had ordered that I was not entitled to be included in any correspondence, or distribution of information regarding the sale of the home. I had written letters, emails, and went to the real estate office and was denied the information. This necessitated filing a petition with the court requesting they be ordered to provide the information.

Their misrepresentation of court ordered secrecy and confidentiality was admitted in a petition they filed on September 22, 2011 by my wife’s attorneys.

The hearing regarding my petition for the information was scheduled for September 20, 2011. At the ex parte request of my wife’s attorneys indicating the unavailability of my wife on that date, Judge Carolyn Carluccio immediately issued an order rescheduling the hearing for September 23, 2011.

At the September 23rd hearing, it was revealed that the continuance had been requested to allow her to attend the closing on the sale of the home. They had proceeded with the sale of the home with the full knowledge that they were operating under a defective order which was under appeal. I had informed the real estate agent and office of the appeal, and provided them copies of the paperwork, and had filed the letters sent to them with the court.

By law, a power of attorney requires the agent to inform the principal of any activity. It must be utilized and executed only in good faith with information shared with the principal. Their fraudulent misrepresentation of the power of attorney was enabled and endorsed by Judge Carolyn Carluccio with her participation in preventing any information regarding the closing date from being made available.

The following is why you are interested in the above information:

On July 18, 2011, Judge Carolyn Carluccio issued a verbal order which indicated that any of my possessions which were not removed by the closing date could be thrown in the trash. I was denied access to the property by the written order dated May 9, 2011. Four Sheriff’s deputies and four Montgomery Township police officers escorted Sonya to the home on June 9, 2011. I had been ordered to vacate the home by the May 9th order. I had done so. There has been no explanation of the purpose of the deputies and police. All parties deny requesting their involvement. The judge has refused to permit a hearing to determine what necessitated their presence. The County Sheriff has refused to provide any reports or orders which relate to their presence.

Due to the volume of false reports to police, I could not go to the house without a written order from the court for fear that police might be called as the only tangible court order indicated I had to vacate the property, I petitioned the court to provide a written court order which would allow me to retrieve my possessions. That petition was scheduled for September 23, 2011.

In late August, I discovered my possessions were being thrown in the trash. I reported it to police. They indicated they could not get involved and I should petiotion the court.

In early September, I drove by the house and there were teams of people taking truckloads of furniture from the house. When they realized it was me, they ran for the house and called police. I took a few pictures from the street and drove to McDonalds for breakfast. When I returned to further photograph the violation of the court order regarding assets, there were seven police cars in front of the house. They waved me down and dramatically ordered me to park. I explained that the activity going on violated the court orders and the police indicated they would not stop her. I also explained that I had no intention of arguing or debating, or even speaking with anyone involved. I was only going to take pictures to further document her actions in violation of court orders.

This action of my wife contacting police with another misrepresentation and false allegation was exactly the situation I had believed was intentionally being set in place with the judge and the lawyer actively participating to arrange it. Judge Carluccio issued a verbal court order which intentionally placed me at risk of a false report to police. When called to her attention on that day she refused to address the issue in her written order. I petitioned the court to address the issue and a hearing was scheduled for September 20, 2011, then continued to September 23, 2011. I further was required to pay for the transcript in order to obtain a tangible copy of the Court Order. It was available a few weeks later, however, by then even the verbal order was insuifficient to prevent an allegation and improper arrest.

On September 23, 2011, Valerie Angst placed Sonya Healy on the witness stand and had her proudly announce that she had sold my home. She followed that with indicating that she had thrown away all of my possessions, and furniture. They then proceeded to indicate that they did it in compliance with a court order which allowed the disposal of my possessions if not retrieved by the closing date on the home. The malicious intent of Judge Carluccio, Valerie Angst and Sonya Healy was clear.

Their actions were executed in bad faith, while an appeal was pending and intentionally being delayed by Judge Carluccio.

There is an additional series of letters initiated by Valerie Angst to prevent arbitration as had been ordered by the defective order. Valerie Angst indicated in her letter cancelling arbitration that the matter was scheduled to be heard on September 23, 2011, with the full knowledge of the closing on the home scheduled for September 20, 2011 had been set in late July when the Agreement of Sale was signed.

I would appreciate knowing if there is any allowance in the Homeowners policy which might permit me to file a claim for the loss of my furniture and all my other property.

For consideration:
Clearly Valerie Angst, Carolyn Carluccio and Sonya Healy have demonstrated undeniable malicious intent to enable, cause and/or perform the actions which resulted in the loss of my personal property. As in 2008, there were others participating in the illegal acts in violation of court orders occurring prior to the unknown deadline.

Does assumed participation of Sonya Healy in causing the loss, negate the my loss? Is this something to be documented?

Sonya Healy abandoned the home in May 2007 and has neglected to follow court orders requiring her to pay household expenses. She was not a resident at the house at any time since May 2007. There is a court order to that effect. The only reason her name remained on the policy was because her name was still on the mortgage. I paid the insurance bill, and had financial responsibility for the mortgagebill and the household expenses, even after ordered to vacate the home permit any consideration?

I would sincerely appreciate your consideration of those aspects. I would not seek to file a formal claim where there is no possibility of recompense for the loss. However, it may be necessary to go through with a formal claim as your independant investigation would provide a third party independant report indicating her responsibility in the loss, and additionally as the reason for the denial of the claim.

Your assistance is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Terance

A writ of mandamus or mandamus (which means “we command” in Latin), or sometimes mandate, is the name of one of the prerogative writs in the common law, and is “issued by a superior court to compel a lower court or a government officer to perform mandatory or purely ministerial duties correctly”.

Mandamus is a judicial remedy which is in the form of an order from a superior court to any government subordinate court, corporation or public authority to do or forbear from doing some specific act which that body is obliged under law to do or refrain from doing, as the case may be, and which is in the nature of public duty and in certain cases of a statutory duty.

It cannot be issued to compel an authority to do something against statutory provision.

Mandamus may be a command to do an administrative action or not to take a particular action, and it is supplemented by legal rights. In the American legal system it must be a judicially enforceable and legally protected right before one suffering a grievance can ask for a mandamus. A person can be said to be aggrieved only when he is denied a legal right by someone who has a legal duty to do something and abstains from doing it.

As a consequence, when a Writ of Mandamus is issued to a lower court to hold a proceeding which it has failed to hear, and where it has demonstrated willful, and deliberate intent to deny the right to a hearing, the Writ of Mandamus includes an order for the judge to be removed from the case and the matter reassigned.

When the Petition for the Writ of Mandamus lists out a series of petitions, and improperly issued orders which demonstrate the clear intent of the judge to deny a party of his rights, and further includes opinions authored by the judge with intent to further commit extrinsic fraud against the party, it is clearly cause for investigation of the misconduct of the judiciary.

It is not admirable for any judge to perform these fraudulent functions in order to conceal the similar actions of prior judges assigned, or not assigned, to the case. It is an reasonable expectation that judge act responsibly and in accordance with the public trust, it is a grievous and heinous crime for justice to be denied for fear of exposure of prior injustices.

Source

When the financial liability of Sonya Healy was beginning to be documented in court documents, and those documents further exposed the ex parte contact between Sonya Healy, Angst & Angst and all of the judges, it became necessary to protect Sonya Healy’s financial interests. At that time Judge Carluccio ceased holding any hearings.

The petitions that the court was refusing to hear were enforcement issues relating to their court orders. All of which were fully supported and would obligate Sonya Healy for costs and damages.

As the County participated actively in the surveillance at the house, when the issue of exclusive use and occupancy arose, how could they hold Sonya Healy harmless when she robbed the home, and how can they excuse that she had additionally violated the exclusive use when she permitted the county to intrude to install their surveillance equipment. The County was a party to the violation. The judge was going to make sure that was covered up.

It is clear, the decision was made to cover up the County’s liability and active participation at all costs.

Their intent was to commit injustices so extreme as to cause Terance Healy to commit suicide. After their target had survived 5 years of constant terror and harassment and litigation, they hadn’t been able to cause him to commit a crime. Not even so much as a threat. They would focus their actions on a single solution. His death.

The teams of informants, investigators and handlers were ended. Isolating their target and leaving him alone. They would then begin sending teams from Montgomery County Emergency Services intermittently to his home to ‘make sure he is ok’ and was ‘not going to harm himself’. The intentional assertion of the idea of suicide. Those who came to his home had no idea why they were there, who had sent them, or what the circumstances were.

There would be no further hearings or petitions accepted as they would only serve to document their growing liability.

Judge Carluccio would throw him out of his home, and further see to it that he was unable to collect his possessions. The Judge would see to it that he only learned of these further personal destructive actions in her courtroom. She wanted to see the pain she inflicted. The goal was to prevent the target from learning about any of these actions until in her courtroom.

Judge Carluccio would commit gross injustices in the hopes of an outburst in court. The deputies were always at the ready as the court was going to spring further and further misdeeds against their target. They needed only one crime, one outburst, one slight offense which could permit them to undermine their target.

Their target never obliged them their much hoped for breakdown and outburst.

The court exposed themselves as the terrorists that they are. Terrorists intent on destroying one man. Terrorists intent on ignoring human and civil rights. Terrorists intent on violating the law. Terrorists intent on committing such cruelty which would leave their target begging his mother for permission to die. Terrorists so intent to cause a suicide they would steal everything a man owned, deny him everything he ever loved in life, humiliate him without cause or explanation, and do it in full view of the world which had decided to ignore his pleas for help. The plea for help and justice had gone ignored.

I demand the immediate removal of the following terrorists from the bench in Montgomery County:
Carolyn Carluccio, Rhonda Daniele, Thomas DelRicci, Emanuel Bertin, Arthur Tilson are all parties who have violated their oath to the people of Montgomery County. They acted as terrorists. They should be tried as terrorists. These terrorists hiding in among the judges of the Montgomery County bench have done more to damage the judiciary in Pennsylvania and exposed the extreme corruption of the entire Family Court bench. Their staff all willingly enabling a terrorist judiciary to act without exposure. The Judicial Conduct Board is once again exposed as a farce.

A Division of the court, Family Court, where personal care and attention was most needed in decisions was left to those who had no respect for the law, or the family… or for life itself.

Their actions, their determination, their intent, and their deliberate willingness to destroy a life, and a family demonstrate their complete disrespect for the community, and the law which they took an oath to protect and defend.

And I am sure I am not their first victim…

When they had that meeting with their insurance company in St Paul, was it decided then that they would seek to cause the suicide of their target? or did they simply decide to terrorize him further? unless they could cause him to commit a crime which would serve to explain their complete denial of his rights.

Every minute of every hour of every day of every week of every month of every year of my life for the last five years, I have been terrorized and harassed and litigated with the clear intent to deny justice… and deny my ability to enjoy life… and prevented any resolution or exit.

There was never an intention for justice. There was no other place for me to turn for justice. The judges blocked any path to justice. Even when they failed at that, and the opportunity for an appeal was availavle, Judge Carluccio has delayed and created more chaos by writing misinformation in her opinions with the intent to keep her corruption from being exposed, and to prevent and deny justice.

Five years… of terror and destruction. How can they repair their damage? They can’t give back the time lost. They can’t relieve the emotional terror they intentionally caused. They can’t take back that they actively prevented any resolution to any issue. They caused it to continue. I have known all along I have been dealing with EVIL.

Their can be no judicial immunity for terrorists.

Last night after posting, and editing the previous entries, I noticed a search was executed seeking the name of a person named in the post. The search was on the tag “Gerry Dougherty”.

Just about that time, the Shockwave Flash program began to fail, stall and to report errors.

It is through the use of programs normally installed on a computer that the illegal and stealth surveillance has been enabled and executed.

Once again, they further victimize the victim while they continue to enable further crimes and protect the perpetrators from prosecution.

I have been indicating for 5 years that there will be no end to the terror and harassment until they are prosecuted, or they succeed at causing my death. And no one has listened. No one has helped. And the injustice and terror continues.

Gerry Dougherty had previously indicated that Montgomery Township Police could do nothing on the matter of the computer intrusion and it should be escalated to the FBI.

Gerry revealed his knowledge of actual surveillance of my computer in August 2007. Instead of taking action on behalf of the victim who had previously reported the intrusion, Gerry acted to protect the perpetrator.

Gerry’s arrival on my doorstep in response to something typed on my computer revealed that he knew the party responsible for the surveillance programs on my computer.

Gerry showed my brother a picture of my computer screen. If the picture was the product of a criminal investigation that action is not permissable.

Upon describing the picture as a screen shot of my computer screen, my brother described the layout of the screen precisely. When my brother asked why I provided this picture to him, and he found out that I did not provide the picture. He then returned to the Police Department to obtain a copy of the picture and was denied.

Gerry improperly violated my rights and in an attempt to discredit and demoralize me, he proceeded to have me involuntarily committed at Montgomery County Emergency Services.

When the paperwork he submitted to justify his actions was deemed to be deficient cause to require involuntary commitment, he updated the paperwork indicating that I had intended to blow up the local mall.

There was never any further activity to investigate the reported computer intrusion. After taking this action to discredit, demoralize and humiliate me, The Montgomery Township Police never conducted any further action relating to the computer intrusion. The single exception being a meeting with Montgomery County Detectives which apparently resulted in their also ceasing any involvement in the investigation of the computer intrusion. The computer intrusion continued, and additionally high tech harassment had begun.

Montgomery Township Police would actively participate in permitting Sonya Healy to violate every court order without consequence.

---

Surveillance content had been provided to Judge Del Ricci on multiple occasions. The most evident occurance caused him to recuse after intentionally delaying and preventing any custody determination for years.

As the lawyers realized they could get away with ex parte contact, they were also enabled to fabricate whatever surveillance information they cared to exchange without consequence or confirmation.

As the judges acted on the information without due process or even verifying the information, their participation in further exchanges and actions was leveraged by their active ex parte participation and activities.

Ex Parte Contact is serious and should not be dismissed or disregarded. When permitted and further acted upon it destroys and leaves the judiciary obligated to continue the contact and prevent the contact from disclosure. I have documented the ex parte contact throughout the case. It has never been denied.

Judge Carluccio has deliberately prevented any hearing because the hearings will reveal the ex parte actions of the judiciary as documented on the Angst & Angst invoices.

When it all comes down, there are 2 reason for the excessive injustices in this case.
1. Illegal Electronic Surveillance.
2. Ex Parte Communications with ALL of the judges involved.

---

When I discovered that Sonya Healy was throwing out my possessions in violation of existing court orders, I went to Montgomery Township Police to report it in person. I expressly requested that any officer except Gerry Dougherty take the report.

Gerry Dougherty was sent to the lobby to inform me that they would take no action to stop her, that it was a civil issue and it would have to be resolved with the court.

I then asked why he was involved in determining that I had left the house on June 9th, and he indicated that it was the Sheriff’s Department that had requested the involvement of Montgomery Township Police. The not getting involved in a civil matter excuse was only provided to me. When the actions were against me, police were enthusiastically involved in the actions.

Sheriff Eileen Behr has refused to provide a report, or an order which indicated what necessitated her deputies to be involved. No one will indicate who requested the Sheriff’s involvement.

---

Whenever the answer is silence, it has been found to be associated with the illegal electronic surveillance. Once again, Gerry indirectly exposed the surveillance.

As the surveillance has been known to Sonya Healy as a perpetrator and co-conspirator, of course she would be permitted to be present with the deputies when they returned to my home to remove their surveillance equipment.

Sonya had initiated the surveillance and played the entire police department and county into furthering her illegal and harassing actions. It was her name on the deed that was utilized to allow access to the home. It was the continued activity to try to set me up in some crime which prolonged the divorce. The twisted contention that it was my fault that the divorce was delayed can only be based on the knowledge that had been unable to accomplish setting me up in a crime and continued to try.

There is no need necessity to not further disclose surveillance actions to the person who first disclosed it in order to prevent her prosecution. They played everyone.

And even while they were playing everyone and terrorizing and harassing me and anyone who supported me, they still committed fraud and other crimes with the knowledge that they would have to be protected based on their participation. They were right, the victim was further victimized at every action.

Sonya and her lawyers commit fraud to bring about further manipulations, because they have so much ex parte leverage that the judges are unable to perform their function with any appearance of fairness.

I have read two documents published by DOJ – Criminal Division relating to Electronic Surveillance issues.
Electronic Surveillance Issues
Electronic Surveillance Manual

When the information in those documents is applied to my situation, it offers an explanation of the inability of law enforcement to investigate and become involved.

The central points being that the product of electronic surveillance may not be disclosed outside of criminal proceedings.

In order to prevent prosecution and conceal a computer and phone surveillance intrusion by my wife at the direction of her lawyer, they intentionally selected and hired a private investigator associated with the county to assume their surveillance. Once proven and detected by myself, it was reported to local police, county detectives and FBI, however, the non-disclosure of electronic surveillance prevented law enforcement action on my behalf.

A consequence of the non-disclosure provisions, was the continued use of electronic surveillance with additional harassment tactics, which were further disclosed and used to manipulate the judiciary in what has become an unending series of crimes, frauds, injustices and complete denial of civil rights which pretend to be a part of a divorce case.

As a crime subsequent to the surveillance can be used as justification, I believe there have been numerous failed attempts to effect that result.

Once this inability of law enforcement to take any action was established, those involved continued the electronic surveillance activity with malicious intent knowing the target would have no available remedy, ability to prevent, or any recourse through law enforcement channels.

I understand there is no way for any level of law enforcement to become involved in a resolution without the dislosure of electronic surveillance. Until there is some permission to disclose the electronic surveillance activity, I will continue to be further victimized by those initially responsible as they work to prevent their actions from being prosecuted.

I have been victimized by these actions since 2007. I have survived and continue to persevere. I respectfully request your involvement and offer my full cooperation and support to provide any informaiton which you may need to proceed with the investigation with the hope of a resolution which will permit me to once again enjoy a life free of constant attacks and litigation.

It should also be noted that there is no effective way to communicate with me that will not disclose your involvement and activity as there is continued surveillance of computer and telephone communications. I believe this has permitted those involved to circumvent and prevent lawful actions to investigate and resolve the matter.

With that knowledge and understanding I request a discussion begin with regard to resolving the issues which I have presented. The crimes against me continue to occur and further involve additional persons manipulated into actions against me, there will be no end to the injustice until those responsible are held accountable and prosecuted accordingly.

Sincerely,
Terance Healy

The secret sale of my home was executed under the false belief that Sonya Healy had power of attorney to execute the documents.

THIS IS WRONG.

The document which has been purported to indicate this permission clearly indicates that Sonya Healy does not have the authority to sign the documents on behalf of Terance Healy.

The document is intentionally not filed along with the deed but is referenced improperly as providing the requisite authority.

The failure of Sonya Healy to follow any court order has become an expectation, a de facto standard of every action which requires further litigation to attempt to enforce the order. Each attempt at enforcing a court order has been dismissed.

A typical experience of the last 5 years. Angst & Angst get an unfair order from a judge, which is then intentionally used to unfairly and improperly commit another action or involve additional people in their misdeeds.

When documented the impropriety which caused the initial unjust ruling is leveraged to provide impunity for the additional transgression. Their actions are excused. The affect on the Defendant of this constant injustice causing further injustice is evident. The victim of injustice survives only to face further injustice.

The issues involved are as follows:
1. The Divorce Decree is defective and void.
2. The Equitable Distribution Order issued with the Divorce Decree is void without a valid Divorce Decree.
3. The Power of Attorney issued as part of the void Equitable Distribution is void.
4. That purported Power of Attorney does not permit the execution of the sale documents on behalf of the Defendant.
5. The parties involved with Sonya Healy have acted with clear intent to commit fraud.

The intentional failure of Judge Carolyn Carluccio to resolve the defective issues, her further actions to prevent appeal of her intentionally defective order, while endorsing, enabling and encouraging the further activity by the Plaintiff to destroy the property of the Defendant demonstrates a bias, corruption and malice that defies definition. Her actions make her a party to the legal matter and unfit to adjudicate the case.

Judge Carolyn Carluccio’s refusal to recuse when these issues are called to the attention of the court demonstrate her willful intent to continue the injustice and her deliberate participation in the harassment and terror the Defendant has experienced under color of law.

---

There is no provision for the secrecy involved in the sale of the home.

The secrecy of their actions demonstrates their intentional fraud in the transaction.

The cooperation of the court in the conspiracy to conceal the transaction further demonstrates the involvement of the court with the intention to commit fraud.

The attempts of the defendant to learn of the activity relating to the sale are clearly documented with the parties involved, and additionally with petitions filed with the court.

The Order specifically orders the Defendant to participate in the transaction, yet the Defendant was denied any information.

All activity by the parties to prevent the Defendant from participation in the transaction are demonstrative of their intent to defraud.

The intentional, deliberate and excessive activity to prevent the Defendant from knowing anything about the sale of his home was indicative that a fraud was being committed.

The willingness to participate in the fraudulent sale of the home is documented.

It is remarkable that at every turn people have been manipulated into liability which causes their further involvement in the conspiracy. Every time I attempt to provide them an opportunity to avoid their manipulation into liability, they fail to respond and act in a responsible and professional way.

When they have acted with intent, I can’t feel sorry for their manipulation into the team working against me. The information on this web site is available to them and yet they STILL willingly participate in the fraud being committed.

---

FURTHER DELAYING THE PROSECUTION OF THEIR CRIMES HAS ONLY SERVED TO INVOLVE MORE PEOPLE IN THEIR CRIMES AND TO PERMIT THE FURTHER TERROR AND HARASSMENT OF THE VICTIM.

The Department of Justice – Criminal Division publishes a document available under the Freedom Of Information Act which is titled Electronic Surveillance Issues. The document additionally has a companion document titled Electronic Surveillance Manual. Reading these documents clearly exposes the issue of why there has been no resolution of any issue in this case.

There is one focal point where an action occurred which caused the case to become unresolvable.

From that point all activity which occurred was intended to either prevent resolution, or manipulate additional people and organizations into liability and further deny resolution.

Constant ex parte contact with the judiciary prevented justice, delayed or denied justice, and corrupted the course of each proceeding. It is from this intentional and corrupt ex parte contact with the judiciary that Sonya Healy acquired impunity to violate every court order and agreement, and additionally be excused when violating the law.

The ex parte contact which occurred between the judges assigned the case and involved the direct actions of Valerie Angst and Rhonda Daniele, Montgomery County Detectives and Montgomery Township Police.

The laws regarding the disclosure of surveillance product, whether legally or illegally obtained, prevent disclosure to anyone within law enforcement, or outside of law enforcement, without proper procedure being followed. The seriousness with which these policies are followed is clearly documented in the Electronic Surveillance Issues document.

From what I have been able to determine, there is only one way to avoid actions for a failure to follow the appropriate procedures in any surveillance matter. The arrest of the target immediately makes all previous surveillance product allowable and acceptable. I suppose it could be said that the end justifies the means.

With that result in mind, the parties involved set about to suggest, enable or cause me to be arrested for a crime which would excuse their years of surveillance. They failed.

Those same parties continued their ex parte communications with the judiciary which delayed and prevented any resolution in the divorce. Their use of Sonya Healy as a named person on the deed to permit the surveillance of the home was just another aspect of their case.

It is this aspect which caused the judiciary to be of the constant expressed and seriously flawed assertion that Terance Healy was preventing the divorce from proceeding, if only because he had not been committing any crime, let alone a crime which would have permitted such invasive surveillance as had been brought about by and with the active participation of the judiciary.

Ex Parte communication is serious activity which affects court proceedings. The affect of ex parte communications in this case has been documented, and the affects have been clearly demonstrated. The ex parte communications has resulted in the complete perversion and prevention of justice in any matter and has further caused the complete denial of life, and liberty, while proceeding with judicial intent to terrorize Terance Healy; to deny him freedom to enjoy life and liberty; and with an overwhelming determination to deny him justice and equal protection of the law.

The incompetence and fraud of Angst & Angst is clearly documented. It is through their incompetence that the litigation continues, and their fraud exposes all of their petitions into question. It is a result of their incompetence that the judiciary must make frequent and obvious actions which expose the clearly intentional action to deny due process. Their incompetent and fraudulent actions serves to expose the judiciary to further actions on the record and with each unjust action brings a liability and inability to explain.

As the top of this web site states. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPS. No one can help.

No one is permitted to present the product of surveillance outside of a criminal proceeding.

Even if I had been tricked into some crime, that crime would have had to justify the need for such extensive surveillance. I have not committed any crime. Anything they were doing would clearly expose and confirm my allegations of intrusive surveillance for the last 5 years. Even after all this time and experience with the extreme corruption of the entire judicial process, I still think perhaps the law and peoples rights may be applicable in other courtrooms.

When any level of law enforcement investigated and discovered that surveillance product had been presented and discussed and acted upon improperly outside of a criminal proceeding, they could not report that to me because they would then be committing the same act. The impossibility of resolution.

On the outside it would appear they were just protecting their friends in law enforcement and the judiciary. In fact, they were following the actions necessary when dealing with electronic surveillance. These issues are documented in the Electronic Surveillance Issues document from the Department Of Justice.

The Department of Justice will need to become involved to unravel the mess which has been created from the surveillance.

The Courts will need to address the crimes being committed under color of law.

The document Electronic Surveillance Issues is the key, The Department Of Justice is the door to resolution.

What I have experienced is a complete failure of law enforcement to act on my case, or to prevent further damage.

Asked by “Fox News Sunday” how the school could have allowed Sandusky’s alleged activities to continue for years, Corbett said, “What I saw was a failure to act, and I always have said your actions speak louder than your words.”

I have been attempting to obtain a meeting with the Attorney General of Pennsylvania to address my case since Tom Corbett was the Attorney General. There has been a complete failure to act by the chief law enforcement officer in the Commonwealth of PA.

The “civil conspiracy theory” has been defined by the courts as (1) an agreement (2) by two or more persons (3) to perform overt act(s) (4) in furtherance of the agreement or conspiracy (5) to accomplish an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means (6) causing injury to another.

Let me see if this definition applies:

When Carolyn Carluccio issued her intentionally defective order which would permit her to prevent or delay an appeal
AND
When Sonya Healy refused to inform Terance Healy regarding any information about her selling of HIS home
AND
When Real Estate Agent Chris Grucella refused to inform Terance Healy of the status of the sale of HIS home
AND
When Keller William staff and management refused to inform Terance Healy of the status of the sale of HIS home
AND
When Valerie Angst intentionally misrepresented that a power of attorney causes Terance Healy to not be entitled to be included in any correspondence, communications or distribution of information regarding the sale of the home
AND
When according to the law, the one sentence Power of Attorney had also expired and was invalid
AND
When the one sentence Power of Attorney was included without request, precedent or necessity by Carolyn Carluccio demonstrating her knowledge and deliberate intent to enable Sonya Healy to fraudulently transfer the property
AND
When a hearing scheduled on Terance Healy’s petition requesting the sale information was continued and rescheduled upon receiving a bad faith, ex parte request from Valerie Angst to allow Sonya Healy to attend the closing of the sale of the home
AND
When Carolyn Carluccio issued a verbal order into the record that Sonya Healy would be permitted to trash everything remaining in the house if it was not removed by the closing date
AND
When Carolyn Carluccio refused to issue a written order granting Terance Healy access to the residence to remove his possessions as her defective written order to vacate could be utilized to cause him to be arrested for being on the property
AND
When Sonya Healy did contact police when Terance Healy discovered she was disposing of his property
AND
When Sonya Healy did misrepresent to police that Terance Healy was not permitted by the defective order to be near the property
AND
When Valerie Angst immediately filed in May her request for arbitration to distribute assets,
which then went unscheduled until the Defendant contacted the masters office,
which once finally scheduled was immediately cancelled by Valerie Angst in a bad faith ex parte request that misrepresented the purpose of a September 23 hearing
which the masters office did NOT reschedule even though they were contacted by Terance Healy in writing and by telephone
AND
When Carolyn Carluccio’s schedule clearly demonstrates that she had no intention of holding the hearings which she scheduled on any petitions filed by Terance Healy
AND
When Carolyn Carluccio has deliberately refused to hold hearings and hear testimony on EVERY petition filed by Terance Healy
AND
When Terance Healy has no other recourse to enforce existing Court Orders than to petition the court for enforcement actions against Sonya Healy
AND
When the judiciary has inexplicably granted Sonya Healy impunity to violate all courts orders without circumstance and has failed to enforce ANY of the actions when petitioned by Terance Healy
AND
When the frequent unethical and inappropriate ex parte communications between the judiciary and Valerie and Robert Angst has been documented, but ignored, even when intentionally exposed to Terance Healy in writing by Angst & Angst
AND
When Judge Carolyn Carluccio has permitted ex parte documents to be submitted by Valerie Angst as exhibits without permitting Terance Healy to review or receive the document,
and this occurs in open court and on the record,
and the unethical action is immediately called to the judge’s attention but excused and no action is taken to correct the violation,
and when the document is a bill from Angst & Angst in support of their seeking sanctions against Terance Healy,
and when their petition sought $3000 in sanctions yet Judge Carluccio after reviewing the ex parte invoice orders a sanction of $ 13,000
AND
When an Angst & Angst invoice for sanctions ordered by Judge Bertin included entries clearly indicating inappropriate ex parte communications,
AND
additionally documenting their intentional failure to follow an Order issued by Judge Bertin,
AND
where that same Order required Terance Healy to refile a Response and CounterPetition as two separate documents,
AND
where after a protracted hearing presented and supported the allegations in the petition yet was dismissed as not cognizable in family court, If only the court heard the document as it was originally filed, the Counterpetition would have been cognizable. There was no consideration that the judge’s order had caused the petition to no longer be cognizable, sanctions were ordered against Terance Healy which when invoiced by Angst & Angst exposed multiple inappropriate ex parte activities.
and
where during a short list hearing with Judge Del Ricci in May 2008, Robert Angst presented a one page typed document which had been presented to police by Sonya Healy which caused them to permit Sonya Healy and 20 other persons with 12 vehicles to break in, burglarize and vandalize the home, and poison the dog. When Terance Healy requested to review the document, he was denied. Judge Del Ricci permitted Robert Angst to involve him in this ethics violation, which Judge Del Ricci neglected to remedy when called to his attention, Sonya Healy’s actions were in violation of several court orders and further voided the Agreed Order which granted exclusive use of the home to Terance Healy.
AND
When during a discovery hearing, the existence of this one page typed document was denied as non existent by Sonya Healy and Valerie Angst,
AND
When it was discovered in August 2010 that an EX PARTE ORDER had been signed by Judge Rhonda Daniele in August 2007 which had never been distributed to Terance Healy, and had never been docketed, and had been kept hidden in a separate folder in the Prothonotary and which had never been provided to Terance Healy during previous reviews of the case file, and that SECRET EX PARTE ORDER could be described as a one-page typed document from Angst & Angst which incorrectly indicated that Sonya Healy had exclusive possession of the home.
AND
The document that they had falsely indicated did not exist was stored in a folder which had been provided to masters and judges when they requested the case file. An EX PARTE ORDER for which there was no hearing. Signed by a Judge who had never been assigned to the case. That judge being the head of the Family Court Division over all of the judges and masters. The choice to conceal the document was intentional. The document had never been referred to or addressed in any custody proceeding. That the document had never been docketed or distributed was obvious, yet no master or judge took any action which would expose the document.
AND
The secret document ordered Supervised Visitation for Terance Healy and his son. As there was no cause for supervised visitation, the order slandered Terance Healy. As he was unaware of the order, he could not defend against an allegation which had not been made. As there were several petitions regarding custody which referred to existing agreements and orders, the masters and judges were intentionally preventing exposure of the document. The clear intent and determined efforts of the judiciary to conceal the existence of this document is inexcusable.
AND
Sonya Healy had abducted their son Brennan from the family home on July 13, 2007. Terance Healy was prevented from any relationship with his son. The court intentionally acted to prevent resolution regarding custody. Hearings were continued. Sonya Healy failed to appear at hearings. Sessions wee intentionally not scheduled. Terance Healy’s issues were not documented in reports by Sara Goren.
AND
A Secret Ex Parte Order signed by Judge Rhonda Daniele provided Sonya Healy and Angst & Angst tremendous leverage against the judiciary.

Leverage that might explain the absolute impunity to violate EVERY court order.
Leverage that might explain judges committing frequent ex parte violations.
Leverage that might excuse lawyers who boldly and deliberately commits ex parte ethics violations, in open court, on the record, which causes the judge to commit an ethics violation in allowing it, another in not correcting it when called to attention, and another when not reporting it to the disciplinary board.

Leverage that would allow a lawyer to become so arrogant as to hand a judge a document during a hearing on the record in a public courtroom, have the ex parte issue raised by the other party, inexplicably fail to correct the ex parte issue, deny the Defendant a copy of the document, and raise the sanction against the Defendant from the $3000 requested in the petition to over $13,000.

Leverage escalates to extortion when there is a threat. Valerie Angst had done it again.

Suppose the invoice included entries detailing the ex parte communications between Judge Carluccio and Angst & Angst. Judge Bertin had ordered sanctions and the Angst & Angst invoice detailed the inappropriate ex parte contact with him. Judge Carluccio has refused to conduct hearings on petitions to obtain the content of those ex parte contacts with Judge Bertin. Judge Carluccio has also refused to hold hearings on petitions to adjust the amount of the sanction where there is fraud on the invoice.

If at that same hearing, Judge Carluccio
-who has not heard any petition filed by the Defendant.
-who has intentionally issued a defective court order
-who has stubbornly refused to correct the defect
-who has thrown you out of your home
-who has prevented you from obtaining your possessions
-who has ordered your personal possessions be thrown in the trash
-who has prevented the appeal from proceeding
-who has ordered power of attorney as part of her defective order
-who has left you penniless and homeless
-who has acted with such malice and cruelty
-who has denied justice in every issue

Even the most cynical would concede it would take considerably more leverage than one secret order to effect this result.

If the lawyer, who told her client to install illegal programs, who hired the private investigator to cover it up, who worked for the county drug task force, a task force that the police officer worked with, who had you involuntarily committed in violation of civil rights and failing to follow the law, at the county psych ward where Judge Rhonda Daniele was on the board before she was a judge, which caused the county detectives to decide to not investigate your computer intrusion or anything else, who indicated to the FBI that they were doing the surveillance and prevented FBI involvement in the case, who has terrorized and harassed the Defendant and everyone he knows, destroying his extended family, preventing him from having any friends.

While I welcomed the faux-friendship of the private investigators and the confidential informants who were dispatched to infiltrate my home and set me up. They were mistreated and disrespected by their handlers. The software used to make sure the informants don’t tell anyone of their involvement is the same software installed on my phones and computers.

The informants agree to their surveillance, it would take a judge issuing a warrant for my surveillance. Well, legally it would. No shortage of judges willing to ignore anyone’s rights.

Judge Del Ricci got that courtesy alert to recuse before I filed the document with the court. I had it edited down to 25 pages, when CM blocked my printer connection. The judge admitted to so many violations of judicial ethics in his recusal speech. His tech references were way off. Whatever he was describing wasn’t me, and BING was brand new and had not indexed my web site until August. Admirable effort concocting the back story.

Judge Bertin was the most reluctant of the corrupt. I always felt his reluctance to become embroiled in the corruption.

The penalty for not doing what Angst & Angst want is exposure by them. It is the same penalty for doing everything they want.

That is clearly demonstrated by the most eager and willing judge to involve herself in the case. Judge Carolyn Carluccio has enthusiastically and eagerly participated disregarding civil and human rights, forgetting the law, ignoring procedures, committing fraud with her schedule, and when all else fails just outright making shit up. She thinks that people might believe the retarded lies. You are a judge, and you can get away with treating people like shit, and destroying them, and you can have a team of deputies who do your bidding, they do it because they want their jobs. They have no respect for you or the way you treat people.

Judge Carluccio embraced being the point person for the destruction of everything I had struggled and persevered to preserve and maintain. Judge Bertin’s reluctance was instantly forgotten with the arrival of the extreme malice and outright cruelty exhibited by Judge Carolyn Carluccio. Judge Carluccio has demonstrated her determination to complete my destruction. Intentionally issuing a bad order is a talked about trait of Carluccio’s court. The Unappealable Order. When documented that the order was procedurally defective and you would have to stall and delay for 5 years instead of your usual 30 days must have been a shock. Your actions to retaliate for my discovering and documenting your miscalculation required extra effort. Your continuing fraud in the opinion attempting to quosh the appeal demonstrates some desperation.

Why exert so much effort to prevent the appeal? Pride? No. Ego? No. Judge Carluccio has not attempted to resolve any issue in a fair manner. When everything she does clearly indicates that she intended for me to have nothing. Someone may ask. Why? What could one man have possibly done to cause such a complete failure of the judicial system? What could I ever have done which might justify the extreme corrupt behavior of the judiciary?

Only one answer fits. I survived and persevered that justice would be served and the truth would be heard and I documented it. I’m not capable of suicide. I wish at times I could have done it. It has been hard to watch what it has done to people who are forced to be spectators because no one will stop an out of control judiciary. And a judge can do whatever a judge wants to do… No one watches. No one cares. When the judges actions are so egregious any attempt to apply judicial impunity will be difficult.

Startling to discover that the District Attorneys Drug Task Force is used as the paramilitary branch of the judiciary, and actively participate in the area drug trade.

That’s a good start on the amount of leverage that Valerie Angst applied on September 23. She was using the leverage of everyone she had manipulated into liability. She has used that leverage since she and Rhonda Daniele began the cover up in August 2007.

The leverage grew. The terror continued. The injustice grew. The liability grew.

I am damaged, but I survived… I honestly do not know how. Someone has to make them stop. Perhaps it is again time to contact the folks in St. Paul for a meeting.

The manipulations of a socipath.