A Terroristic Divorce

RULE 1920.41 NO DEFAULT JUDGMENT
No judgment may be entered by default or on the pleadings.

Judge Carluccio is violating this rule in order to prevent the entry of any exhibit which will expose the corrupt actions of the pior judges on this case.

Judge Carluccio is extending the impunity granted to the plaintiff on the case. The definition of inpunity clearly indicates the situation which has prevented any justice in this case and permitted the continued harassment and terror for over 5 years.

Impunity – the impossibility, de jure or de facto, of bringing the perpetrators of violations to account – whether in criminal, civil, administrative or disciplinary proceedings – since they are not subject to any inquiry that might lead to their being accused, arrested, tried and if found guilty, sentenced to appropriate penalties, and to making reparations to their victims.

Impunity arises from a failure to meet obligations to investigate violations, to take appropriate measures in respect of the perpetrators, particularly in the area of justice, by ensuring that those suspected of criminal responsibility are prosecuted, tried and duly punished; to provide victims with effective remedies and to ensure that they receive reparation for the injuries suffered; to ensure the inalienable right to know the truth about violations; and to take other necessary steps to prevent a recurrence of violations.