A Terroristic Divorce

PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY PETITION FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDERS OF 9/6/07 AND 9/23/09 filed 2/24/11
(See note at the end of this post regarding that title.)

1. The hearing was called regarding the EMERGENCY Petition received at the Prothonotary on February 24, 2011 at 11:16AM.

2. The Prothonotary printed the label indicating the document was filed on February 24, 2011 at 3:47PM.

3. The EMERGENCY Petition was curiously not filed electronically by Angst & Angst.

4. The EMERGENCY Petition was only scanned by the Prothonotary Mailroom on March 1, 2011.

5. The Petition was mailed to the Defendant by Angst & Angst on March 1, 2011 with the CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED ELECTRONICALLY ON MARCH 2, 2011.

6. The EMERGENCY was granted on March 3, 2011 by Judge Carolyn Carluccio.

7. The Petition was received by the Defendant on March 3, 2011 at 1:43PM.

8. The Defendant was notified by telephone on March 4, 2011 (mid-afternoon) of the March 9th hearing where Judge Carolyn Carluccio had granted 1 hour of her time for the issue.

9. The Defendant indicated during that call that there would be more time required for the hearing, and he would appreciate more time to prepare a response.

10. This information was RUDELY DENIED by Peggy Reiter who indicated that was all the time the judge had for the EMERGENCY hearing. (Peggy was already covering up the ex parte letter between Angst & Angst and the Judge from December 2010)

THIS LEFT THE DEFENDANT WITH LIMITED TIME TO RESPOND TO THE CONTRIVED PETITION.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
NOTE: Angst & Angst had not filed any petition since the hearing in December 2009 before Judge Bertin, where their criminal actions, though completely proven, were determined to be NOT COGNIZABLE in the Family Court. They knew that if they filed anything further, what was not cognizable as a stand alone petition would again be cognizable when re-attached to a response.

Judge Bertin had ordered the separation of CounterPetition from Reponse in August 2009 causing the counter petition to become not cognizable when heard alone. Angst & Angst threw Judge Bertin under the bus when they billed the Defendant for the Ex Parte contact with the Judge as part of the fees ordered. This was intentional because Judge Bertin did not evict the defendant based on their fraud and lies. Judge Bertin recused after those invoices were submitted as an Exhibit in AUGUST 2010.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
8. On Tuesday March 8, 2011, Defendant filed a Response and Counter Petition. The Response & Counter document was 129 pages in length. There was more to be added to the Counter Petition, however time contraints did not allow for the inclusion of the complete Counter Petition. I had to drive to Norristown to file my response.

THE HEARING

10. Judge Carluccio indicated she was aware of the response at the hearing though the sizeable document was mysteriously not visible on her bench.

11. Judge Carluccio was advised the document was 129 pages and not on her desktop.

12. Judge Carluccio was then provided a copy of the Response and Counter by the Defendant.

13. Judge Carluccio then proceeded to announce that she did not have the time to read it, or the time to hear the response in her schedule.

14. Judge Carluccio then proceeded to disregard the law and inject ridiculous notions such as:
– that only items circled in Court Orders were valid,
– that the court had to declare agreements void (forgetting that SHE IS THE COURT),
– that an Agreed Order witnessed by a Judge was a Order and not an Agreement,
– that there was no way the Plaintiff could be impacted negatively because she filed the emergency petition,
– that what happened in the past had nothing to do with what was happening in her courtroom.

15. Defendant was firm in his position citing the case events and the applicable laws.

16. Peggy Reiter continued to SHHH the Defendant as punctuation to each of his sentences.

17. Defendant was constantly interrupted by the Judge when responding to her questions.

18. Security Guards began appearing in the courtroom to intimidate the Defendant.

(Security Guards know the story – from the day when 5 of them followed him around the courthouse as he filed the Ex Parte Petition in December 2010. They appeared but did not move to within 2 feet as previously had been done during hearings.)

19. An Overwhelmed Judge Carluccio continued to indicate she did not have time for the hearing, or the presentation of any defense or Counter.

20. After calling a breif recess, Judge Carluccio returned indicating she had decided to take the matter under advisement and would read the Defendant’s Response and Counter Petition.

NICE TRY ANGST & ANGST… YOUR CRIMINAL ACTIONS AND CORRUPTION ARE CATCHING UP TO YOU.

I CAN GENERATE AN ACCURATE RESPONSE TO YOUR PETITIONS FASTER THAN YOU CAN CORRUPT THE COURT STAFF.

EVERYONE IN THE PROTHONOTARY WAS SUSPICIOUS OF THE ODD DATE STAMPS, AND THE SELECTION OF NOT FILING ELECTRONICALLY.

IT WAS CLEAR YOU WANTED TO MAKE SURE THERE WAS LIMITED TIME FOR THE DEFENDANT TO RESPOND. I STILL WAS ABLE TO SUPPLY A LOGICAL ORDERLY ACCURATE INDEXED RESPONSE OF 129 PAGES WITH COMPLETE EXHIBITS.

THE ANGSTS HAD CHECKED WITH THE JUDGE’S STAFF (PEGGY) AND BEEN TOLD WHEN THE JUDGE WOULD HEAR THE EMERGENCY.

THEY THEN HAD THE PROTHONOTARY DELAY SCANNING THE DOCUMENT UNTIL THAT TIME – But it still was logged as filed on February 24th. (And the Order records the title as that date – falsely implying there was considerably more time between filing and hearing.)

WHY? Because on Appeal, the Appeals court accepts that the Docket is accurate and doesn’t read the petitions beyond the title in the docket. Mark Levy was notified of this suspicious practice and has failed to act on it. He was in the Prothonotary when his staff was informing me of the suspicious date stamps yet maintained his distance.

THE BIG NEWS: This confirms the activity of the Prothonotary intentionally hiding the Secret Order of August 22, 2007. Because someone in the Prothonotary has been manipulating the time stamps. AND if you read the Titles docketed by the Prothonotary, you will notice the intentional misrepresentation of the petitions filed.

SO……. the JUDGE ISSUED AN ORDER AFTER “THE HEARING”.

PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY PETITION FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDERS OF 9/6/07 AND 9/23/09 filed 2/24/11

And Now, this 9th day of March 2011, after a hearing in the above captioned matter, it is hereby ORDERD AND DEDCREED tha tthe matter is taken under advisement.

…..

The title and opening sentence intentionally suggest there was plenty of time and that there was a complete hearing on the matter. I was not permitted to call any witnesses; present any exhibits; or any discovery. Curious, eh? There was no hearing. Just the exposure of more corruption and conspiracy… and Judge Carluccio did not circle any items on the order. Is it valid? Ridiculous notions, eh?

MONTGOMERY COUNTY…. they think people are too stupid to see through their chaos.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ANOTHER NOTE::: It would seem that the Montgomery Township Constable, who had helped her burlgarize my home and was pictured doing so in the Reposnse, met the Plaintiff at her place of work after the hearing. I guess they thought they could move very quickly to evict me after their rushed hearing. They underestimate the power of the TRUTH time and time again.