A Terroristic Divorce

It would seem that Sonya Healy is going to be doing some international travel.

As my only exit from her terroristic divorce is the prosecution of the people and companies/organizations behind the terroristic actions, is it outside the realm of possibility that Sonya Healy does not plan to return to the USA? While Sonya hides in the U.K., Angst & Angst can continue to act on her behalf to maintain the unending and prolonged divorce proceedings.

This is not outside the realm of imagination. Not even outside the experience of the Montgomery County courts. The Librett/Marran case shows that in Montgomery County a criminal can have her attorneys continue expensive and unending litigation by proxy EVEN WHEN the attorney’s do not know the whereabouts of their client.

In Librett, the father was denied any relationship or contact with his child while the mother who kidnapped her was in hiding with the child in Canada, yet all the while the mother’s attorneys continued the legal battle against the father’s court ordered custody …even while the child was missing …for over 3 years.

So, is Sonya Healy going on the vacation like she planned for her son 2 years ago,… Recall when the court denied the father’s legal rights and without any conference, proceeding, hearing, or opportunity to respond to the false allegations in the mother’s petition, the court ordered the father permit the child to leave the country EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS A 6 MONTH OLD CUSTODY PETITION PENDING. A clear violation of PA, US and International laws on custody, and a due process civil rights violation.

The child did return from the ‘vacation’, but probably only because the plan was exposed before they could eliminate the liabilities of all involved parties, mother, lawyers and court staff.

It is absolutely maddening to have to endure this constant incorrect responses to requests for Discovery Documents.

I had to request the discovery documents. I did. (January 2010)

They had to have time to provide it. They did not. (March 2010)

I had to file a Motion to Compel. I did. (April 2010)

There was a Hearing. (May 2010)

The Discovery Master recommended an Order. (June 2010)

The Judge issued the order. (June 2010)

They provide the incomplete paperwork AGAIN.
Paperwork that I already had BECAUSE THEY ARE MY BANK STATEMENTS, but missing a few pages. It’s the statements they did not provide that I had requested.

BUT THERE’S MORE… (They always have an additional action to their ‘accidental’ errors. It is not meant to clarify, it is intended to permit the introduction of further chaos if their actions are exposed.)

In their transmittal letter, they incorrectly referenced what was sent. (OOPS, an accidental error. I could see this one from a mile away this time.)

SURPRISE! A week later, you get a letter correcting their misstatement, but still failing to provide the documents requested and ordered.

SO… after 6 months of paperwork, petitions, conferences and hearings…

You went thru the process. You filed, You waited, You explained, You waited, You received the wrong things…

START OVER AGAIN,… But this time you get to start over and they will accuse you of doing this purposely. This has been their plan all along.

YOU HAVE TO START ALL OVER… They aren’t in contempt because they have “obviously” misunderstood the phrases in the Court Order – even though they were in the conferences and hearings. You have no choice but to endure another round of this discovery game.

There are 2 tactics at work here:
The tactic of providing vast amounts of incorrect documentation is intended to waste time. Forcing you to request the correct documentation again and again, is intended to exhaust everyone involved. All the while, they complain to the court that you are asking for too much paperwork. They then present all of the unrequested documents to the court making it appear that you are being unreasonable. BUT, THEY STILL HAVE YET TO PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS YOU REQUESTED. REASON: THE DOCUMENTS YOU ARE REQUESTING WILL REVEAL MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR CRIMES.

The tactic of everything they do provide being altered, or clearly fraudulent. By submitting all information to the court which is altered, inaccurate or fraud, when you point out their fraud, they will indicate that YOU THINK EVERYTHING IS FRAUD so you must be wrong. And after you spend all your time proving their fraud, they will indicate you wasted the courts time, because YOU knew it was fraud.

The feeling of exhaustion from over 3 years of this ‘game’ is overwhelming. Their apparent impunity prevents them from any repercussions.