2010
04.20

A lawyer whose advise results in their client’s commision of a crime will do everything within their power to avoid their own prosecution and disbarrment.

A Private Investigator will not expose the actions and tactics of another Private Investigator.

Police won’t generally expose the improper actions of other police, or former police officers.

County Detectives follow the same and protect the police from exposure.

The District Attorney’s Office protects their own staff who have directed detectives and police not to act.

An organization known as the AntiSpyware Coalition advocates against detection and removal of the surveillance software.

Software companies like McAfee, Symantec, Microsoft, etc… code their anti-virus, anti-spyware programs to permit the stealth installation of surveillance programs. They allow the programs to run secretly. The programs are not invisible. The programs are permitted to hide very well.

When you detect them, don’t expect any assistance…. they will all pretend to have no comprehension of the science fiction type idea you are presenting. They will all concentrate their efforts on ignoring you.

This is what has happened to me since July 2007 when I proved the software was illegally installed on my computers in February 2007. BUT, I have survived and persevered for several years. I had no choice or any other option. Sorry, I am just not capable of suicide. I imagine there have been plenty who exited by that method.

The longer I last the more likely their whole conspiracy will be exposed…
… Now everyone knows about the sci-fi program that can activate a camera remotely and spy on students in Upper Merion school District.
… Now everyone knows your neighbors can hack your computers like Philly’s so-called Bonnie & Clyde.

“Through their own words. They will be exposed. They’ve got a severe case of the Emperor’s new clothes.” – O’Connor

2010
04.20

This morning, while I was making some calls and preparing to post a few entries, there was a noise in the basement.

The noise can best be described as ‘a series of circuit breakers being thrown’. There was no one else in the house at the time. There hadn’t been anyone in the basement since yesterday and nothing was left on. I went down to check out the noises and there appeared to be nothing to note.

My general thought is that it may well be time to investigate exactly what is hidden behind the one wall. One wall has been at the center of many questionable ‘things’. I had always thought that they had found a way back in to remove whatever it was hidden there… but apparently they have not yet removed it. I think I know what it is and does. I am very curious to see exactly what it looks like after all this time. I had only read about their use in the UK. How do you suppose one ended up in my basement?

2010
04.20

Last time they were unable to schedule anything it held up Judge Del Ricci scheduling anything from March 5, 2009 until mid-June delaying any actions in custody until he arbitrarily decided to recuse himself in July 2009.

Previously, Sara Goren had delayed scheduling the custody issue EVEN AFTER being told it was ridiculous for her to have suggested my waiting 3 weeks to reconsider going to court with the custody case. After waiting 6 months for her to have her waste of time conciliation conference? and it had been almost a year since I had seen my son. She waited anyway and I got wind of plans to take my son out of the US without my permission which was required.

The two petitions which have not been scheduled will directly affect the ability to comply with the next submission requirement. And when I don’t do something, THAT is blamed for everything which does and doesn’t happen.

So again, we have scheduling delays… this time we find Sonya is trying to leave the USA. If she didn;t return, well things would just continue much the same with her attorneys continuing to handle the harassment and her not available for anything. (Expecting their paranoid accusations.)

Perhaps Montgomery County Court Administration is a much more involved participant in this ‘divorce’.

2010
04.20

The Upper Merion School District is also in Montgomery County. It comes as no surprise to me that the surveillance software was being utilized with the knowledge of law enforcement. Police were using the programs to track stolen computers and catch the theives. Police were also aware of the potential for abuse of the program. Only a fool wouldn’t recognize the potential for abuse.

The first round of stories included lies about “limited usage” of the program and the types of surveillance information obtained. They also tried to pin all the blame on some IT staff at the school district. They had the student’s parents being ‘influenced’ to drop the issue because of what it would cost the school district and neighbors tax impact. Now we find there are over 56,000 pictures from the over 2300 students laptops.

My troubles began when I detected the illegally installed software. Funny, all of the issues being raised in the Upper Merion School District case is just a partial list of those I have persevered through alone. They should be happy they won’t have to deal with all of the harassment and obfuscation directed at me once I reported my issue to police.

Here’s the story from the local paper:


Pa. district took 56,000 images on student laptops
By MARYCLAIRE DALE, Associated Press Writer Maryclaire Dale, Associated Press Writer – Tue Apr 20, 8:24 am ET
PHILADELPHIA – A suburban school district secretly captured at least 56,000 webcam photographs and screen shots from laptops issued to high school students, its lawyer acknowledged Monday.

“It’s clear there were students who were likely captured in their homes,” said lawyer Henry Hockeimer, who represents the Lower Merion School District.

None of the images, captured by a tracking program to find missing computers, appeared to be salacious or inappropriate, he said. The district said it remotely activated the tracking software to find 80 missing laptops in the past two years.

The Philadelphia Inquirer first reported Monday on the large number of images recovered from school servers by forensic computer experts, who were hired after student Blake Robbins filed suit over the tracking practice.

Robbins still doesn’t know why the district deployed the software tracking program on his computer, as he had not reported it lost or stolen, his lawyer said.

The FBI has opened a criminal investigation into possible wiretap violations by the district, and U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, of Pennsylvania, has introduced a bill to include webcam surveillance under the federal wiretap statute.

The district photographed Robbins 400 times during a 15-day period last fall, sometimes as he slept in bed or was half-dressed, according to his lawyer, Mark Haltzman. Other times, the district captured screen shots of instant messages or video chats the Harriton High School sophomore had with friends, he said.

“Not only was Blake Robbins being spied upon, but every one of the people he was IM chatting with were spied upon,” said Haltzman, whose lawsuit alleges wiretap and privacy violations. “They captured pictures of people that have nothing to do with Harriton. It could be his cousin from Connecticut.”

About 38,000 of the images were taken over several months from six computers the school said were stolen from a locker room.

The tracking program took images every 15 minutes, usually capturing the webcam photo of the user and a screen shot at the same time. The program was sometimes turned on for weeks or months at a time, Hockeimer said.

“There were no written policies or procedures governing the circumstances surrounding activating the program and the circumstances regarding turning off the activations,” Hockeimer said.

Robbins was one of about 20 students who had not paid the $55 insurance fee required to take the laptops home but was the only one tracked, Haltzman said.

The depositions taken to date have provided contradictory testimony about the reasons for tracking Robbins’ laptop. One of the two people authorized to activate the program, technology coordinator Carol Cafiero, invoked her Fifth Amendment right not to answer questions at the deposition, Haltzman said.

About 10 school officials had the right to request an activation, Hockeimer disclosed Monday.

The tracking program helped police identify a suspect not affiliated with the school in the locker room theft, Hockeimer said. The affluent Montgomery County district distributes the Macintosh notebook computers to all 2,300 students at its two high schools, Hockeimer said.

As part of the lawsuit, a federal judge this week is set to begin a confidential process of showing parents the images that were captured of their children.

The school district expects to release a written report on an internal investigation in the next few weeks, Hockeimer said. School board President David Ebby has pledged the report will contain “all the facts — good and bad.”